![]() |
|
ten stone testicle |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
There's a lot more to being healthy than being reasonably free of delusion. [EDIT] I gotta go make some money without sucking on the govt. teat, so I won't be able to play with you for a few hours. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Trent Gamblin
Member #261
April 2000
![]() |
Being healthy doesn't make you any less ignorant. EDIT: Good for you. Make no mistake, I'm extremely thankful that there are people who pay for my existence. It's not like I never try - and I spent 2 months living inside a tarp before I accepted any assistance whatsoever. My feet look like a mummies feet because they were mostly wet without any change in socks or boots that whole time.
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
I'd draw you a Venn diagram of that statement if I thought you could comprehend it. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Trent Gamblin
Member #261
April 2000
![]() |
It's funny because I'm not trying to be mean here at all and I'm pretty sure you are. EDIT: Ok, let's end this feud. We'll each post nice drawings of each other. I'll go first. {"name":"607759","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/0\/0\/00a75de88f892897c750fee468aef700.png","w":675,"h":1212,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/0\/0\/00a75de88f892897c750fee468aef700"}
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
{"name":"government-leech.jpg","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/2\/22d28379754420f313bd324e692e1e7d.jpg","w":442,"h":480,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/2\/22d28379754420f313bd324e692e1e7d"} Sure. And since you don't have the wisdom to lead your own life, I'll tell you what to do. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Trent Gamblin
Member #261
April 2000
![]() |
It's already been established by the majority here that's you're ignorant (and an old crank, I added that part for fun - you should try fun sometime) I think I'll trust my own judgement over yours but thanks anyway! Append: And did you just quote yourself in your sig?
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
Trent Gamblin said: And did you just quote yourself in your sig? I read it somewhere about a year ago, but don't remember who said it, and Google can't seem to find it. OTOH, the truth of it should be apparent on the face of it. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
![]() |
Trent Gamblin said: EDIT: Ok, let's end this feud. Yes, do.
|
Trent Gamblin
Member #261
April 2000
![]() |
Well Arthur, I have a very big and close family on both sides. I don't like mooching - but I'm sure at least most of my family doesn't mind paying taxes and I KNOW they pay more than enough to cover the small amount I get each month. What is your argument now? LennyLen said: Yes, do. That was supposed to be a joke image but he doesn't laugh. :/
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
Trent Gamblin said: I'm sure at least most of my family doesn't mind paying taxes and I KNOW they pay more than enough to cover the small amount I get each month. Is it enough to cover the overhead and bureaucracy of getting it to you? Suppose they paid you directly and were able to deduct it? They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
![]() |
Arthur Kalliokoski said: Is it enough to cover the overhead and bureaucracy of getting it to you? Suppose they paid you directly and were able to deduct it? The overhead of our AISH system is pretty low comparatively. I think its funny you think Trent is some kind of weak mama's boy who never tried a day in his life, when he's not only been homeless, but near death on more than one occasion. Not to forget he continues to try to make a living, such that he can leave "the government teat". Pretty sure he's put up with a hell of a lot more than you and you continue to push judgement on him like you're some kind of perfect specimen of society. Also, I thought you dropped the microphone and left? -- |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
If I tell my sob stories the responses imply I'm lying anyway, so I'll stop altogether. You guys know computers more than most, but it doesn't seem to make you smart in other ways. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
![]() |
Arthur Kalliokoski said: If I tell my sob stories the responses imply I'm lying anyway, so I'll stop altogether. I really do just think you're being a jerk. Since you didn't get any help, noone else can have any either. I personally resisted a long time. I had a lot of pride. Then I was almost homeless.. Had I been homeless I'd have died. Pure and simple. And I wouldn't be here now, a constructive member of society, paying my dues and working, returning every single cent I got back to society, and then some. IMO its like a loan. there will always be deadbeats. Whether or not you think loans should not exist because some people take advantage is up to you, but its a really short sighted, and imo stupid line of thinking. Quote: You guys know computers more than most, but it doesn't seem to make you smart in other ways. I'm not sure what that has to do with anything at all.... -- |
Vanneto
Member #8,643
May 2007
|
I think I have this figured out. Arthur will never accept there are more honest people than deadbeats. Probably some bad experience in his life that got him this irrational belief. I highly recommend Steven Pinker's The Better Angels of Our Nature. But beware, its actually scientific! Why he believes Trent is said deadbeat? Because he doesn't accept depression as fact, and because of that Trent can only be lying and mooching. Or maybe this was already known? I dunno if I made a discovery or not... In capitalist America bank robs you. |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
Why does Trent imply that I'm telling lies? Methinks he doth protest too much. "Free" money is very seductive, as is power of any kind. Like the cops in the L.A. cops thread. As another example of how government power to do things by fiat gets out of hand, here's another tale of the bunny inspectors going nuts. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
![]() |
I avoided this thread subconsciously because of the title. It wasn't until I was told this is where the Arthur beating was going on that I decided to open it and read it from the beginning (I'm getting "too old" for that). beoran said: The main point of a healthcare system where (almost) everyone is insured regardless of their payments, and every one who can pays, is that is in fact cheaper in most cases than what you have in the USA. Just look at Canada, for insta[n]ce. Maybe it looks rosy from Luxembourg, but as a Canadian citizen let me humbly point out that the Canadian health care system is not one to model yours after. Our system is badly broken in most of the country. Waiting isn't a possibility. It's a guarantee until you're dying. In other words, you don't have that kind of time, don't bother going to the hospital. The politicians take their families to private health care facilities (which I think says it all; perhaps they should prohibit this to force them to fix things). Basically there is a massive shortage of doctors in Ontario (probably nation-wide) so the emergency rooms are packed with non-emergency cases (since those people have nowhere else to go). I don't make a habit of going to the hospital, but a couple of years ago my dentist told me that there was swelling in my throat and that I should have it looked at by a doctor. I don't have a doctor! Anyway, I let it go for about a week, but I was noticing symptoms too and decided to go to the emergency room (for like the first time in 7 years) to get it looked at. I waited 5 1/2 hours, after which I saw a doctor for all of 45 seconds (I'm not exaggerating). He diagnosed me on the spot and threw me out. I can't really blame him. I'm sure it's infuriating getting walk-in cases like that that are probably usually "run its course" type of things. Nevertheless, for most Canadians, we have nowhere else to go. I wanted to also ask for a referral to a psychiatrist or psychologist, but honestly didn't feel comfortable doing so. There was basically no privacy. I digress... Append: For a more real situation, my grandmother has bad knees and basically cannot walk. She has been waiting years for surgery on them, but they just keep rescheduling her. I guess if they wait long enough she'll pass and they won't have to do the surgery. From the sounds of it European nations seem to have accomplished public health care worth modelling, but trust me when I say that Canada has not. William Labbett said: )
+1, William, you are awesome. Vanneto said:
I think that they actually loosened the nose there rather than tightened it. Honestly, the US should definitely prohibit smoking indoors, including in vehicles or residences where minors coexist. For all intents and purposes, it is an assault on other people to pollute their oxygen supply. Trent Gamblin said: We'll each post nice drawings of each other. I'll go first.
I found this picture quite amusing. Trent Gamblin said:
Whoa, temporal anomaly! Thomas Fjellstrom said: I personally resisted a long time. I had a lot of pride. Then I was almost homeless.. Had I been homeless I'd have died. Pure and simple. I think you're selling yourself a little short here. Anyway, I mostly came in this thread to defend poor Arthur because it seems the whole damn community is ganging up on him and for no good reason. The USA is NOT Britain or Australia or whatever country you're from where public health care works. It would not work overnight. There would be far too much resistance to let it work. Half of the country wants it to fail just to say, "I told you so!" It's doomed until the population can be enlightened to not see "socialism" as the enemy. By definition they have to work together for the system to work. That sort of goes against everything they're taught. Even so, it's doomed until the government is refactored to deter exploitation of power. Canada is currently in bad shape too. Our government is fucking insane right now and Canadian citizens are taking it sitting down. Basically the system needs the right auditing in place to see where and why money is flowing through it, and you need a transparent system that is peer-based to prevent it from being exploited. There needs to be redundancies. If you can buy off one person and exploit the system then it's doomed. The best thing would be for all financial records to become publicly available automatically and irrevocably. I think that Arthur makes valid points. I personally think that our governments in Canada and the USA are crooked as Hell right now, and I'm afraid for the future because I can't see any way to rein them in. In particular when the majority of the population just accepts it and ignores it. There are bigger fish to fry, I suppose. I will say this: Americans are far too goddamn obsessed with "liberal" or "conservative". Wipe those terms from your vocabulary. They don't mean fucking anything useful. It's just propaganda and brand loyalty. I don't know how the US system works, but you shouldn't be voting for either party. Personally, I see awesome work being done by the Green Party of Canada. More Canadians need to familiarize themselves with the Greens and all the good stuff that they're trying to do for Canada and tell all of those crooked major party assholes to go fuck a goat. As for the OP, I'm disappointed that we didn't take the opportunity to make jokes about a guy with massive cojones. -- acc.js | al4anim - Allegro 4 Animation library | Allegro 5 VS/NuGet Guide | Allegro.cc Mockup | Allegro.cc <code> Tag | Allegro 4 Timer Example (w/ Semaphores) | Allegro 5 "Winpkg" (MSVC readme) | Bambot | Blog | C++ STL Container Flowchart | Castopulence Software | Check Return Values | Derail? | Is This A Discussion? Flow Chart | Filesystem Hierarchy Standard | Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons | How To Use Header Files | GNU/Linux (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo) | rot (rot13, rot47, rotN) | Streaming |
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
![]() |
bamccaig said: Our system is badly broken in most of the country. It actually isn't quite as bad as some make it out to be. It could be better. But what that needs is more money, and better management. You have to realize that each province manages its own healthcare system. The federal government just distributes cash via transfer payments to the various provinces. If you want your system improved, get involved and force your provincial govt to fix it. Quote: I think that Arthur makes valid points. In general, sure. There are people that take advantage of the system. But thats the only point he seems to be making, over and over. And to him, that's apparently enough to make it a complete waste of time and effort. -- |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
Thomas Fjellstrom said: But what that needs is more money Where have I heard that before? Oh, yeah! The US education system! We all know how well that worked out! They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
![]() |
Arthur Kalliokoski said: Where have I heard that before? Oh, yeah! The US education system! We all know how well that worked out! *sigh* You left out the second half of that statement. Just throwing money at a problem almost never works. Our system here in Alberta was working pretty damn good till the budget was slashed in the 90/2000s. And it'll take a lot of work to get it back up to the way it was. And probably more money than we saved by slashing the budget. We lost a lot of good doctors, closed hospitals, closed a bunch of beds in still open hospitals, slashed pay. Over all it was a bad idea. Thats not to say our system here in Alberta isn't working. It's just not working as well as it could. Its still 1000x better than what you get in the US. I love how you cherry pick stuff to comment on, totally out of context. edit: I honestly think you're just trolling now. -- |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
It's the same old story, give somebody responsibility for something and they'll eventually slack off, if nobody is watching them. But who watches the watchmen? More money just means more opportunity for waste unless the Big Boss is watching closely, and for government programs the Big Boss is the public, but an unhealthy percentage of citizens are too lazy to do so. They just want to sit back and enjoy the benefits. Check out the nomenklatura and productivity of workers in the USSR. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
![]() |
And thats why the people have to stay involved. If you let the people in charge do whatever the hell they want, it'll eventually go to shit. Here in Canuckistan we're slowly getting our voices heard via the CRTC. Used to be that the Govt and the CRTC was just a lap dog for the big telecom and media companies. NO LONGER! We've managed to actually make ourselves heard, and things are changing back in the people's favour. Next up, get Stephen Harper and his lackeys thrown out. Why do people always bring up Communism? Especially the USSR. It was NEVER true Communism. It wasn't even attempted. -- |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
Well, in "true" communism (like the communes the beatniks had back in the '60's) there weren't so many people that they couldn't help but notice who wasn't contributing. Once it gets past a certain size, there will always be people willing to sit back and take it easy. Hence, taking care of your own via extended families etc., everybody will know who the goldbricks are. Insurance for the big things, and people have to research who the dishonest insurance companies are. And doctors who have to actually compete on price. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
![]() |
Arthur Kalliokoski said: And doctors who have to actually compete on price. Except they don't. Because they don't have to. -- |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
Thomas Fjellstrom said: Because they don't have to. Why not? Because of the government interference? They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
![]() |
Arthur Kalliokoski said: Why not? Because of the government interference? In the American system, they have no incentive to compete. So they don't. They can charge as much as they want, and they do. -- |
|
|