![]() |
|
SpeedHack - online Rule-O-Matic |
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
![]() |
New to this year's competition is an online Rule-O-Matic. The more people that participate in this, the better. http://www.speedhack.allegro.cc/ You'll notice there is a new Rule-O-Matic section. You can add rules and rate other people's rules. This will help determine which rules will govern the 2005 competition. Once there are a number of rules entered, I'll add a "Spin the Rule-O-Matic" page where you can see a sample, generated ruleset. |
BAF
Member #2,981
December 2002
![]() |
Looks good so far |
nonnus29
Member #2,606
August 2002
![]() |
Quote: Freestyle The Rule-O-Matic has decided that this SpeedHack is going to be a freestyle contest. You can produce any entry you like - providing that Allegro is used. I'm sure that will be a great relief for the rest of you! This is the best rule. All right thinking programmers will vote for it. |
X-G
Member #856
December 2000
![]() |
I rated all the ones I could. Most were good, some were bad. -- |
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
![]() |
I've added over fifty rules to get the thing primed. Most of them have come from earlier SpeedHacks and suggestions in previous threads. Registration for the SpeedHack will be begin within a few days. I'm going to make it a requirement that before you can register, you first have to add a few of your own rules and rate a handful of others. This is to encourage more participation, and hopefully get rules that people will enjoy. If you happen to notice one of your rules gets deleted, don't re-add it. It most likely means that it was a duplicate of an earlier rule. I make mention of this on the Add Rule page, but just to make sure people understand what the categories mean:
As always, the spirit of this competition is to have fun. Getting worked up over the rules isn't worth it! They are there to just add some craziness to the atmosphere and hopefully provide some inspiration. |
X-G
Member #856
December 2000
![]() |
I added a rule (Utter Dementia). For some examples of existing things I consider to be utterly demented, see things such as: -- |
Moving Shadow
Member #5,973
July 2005
![]() |
The game should contain no text.....::)
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
![]() |
There's no need for that. Rate rules you don't like down. Add your own rules. Anyone with a bad attitude need not apply. |
Moving Shadow
Member #5,973
July 2005
![]() |
Quote: Rate rules you dont like down Done. |
Zaphos
Member #1,468
August 2001
|
Not a big issue, but there's a slight problem with the generator & the special "no rules" rules; I see I can get one requirement stating there is no requirement, and another stating an additional requirement! Not a big deal, sure, but I figured I'd mention it.
|
X-G
Member #856
December 2000
![]() |
Quote: The game should contain no text..... I voted that one Good. It's really cool, actually. Imagine dialogue which consists entirely of speech bubbles with symbolic representations in them. Would be an interesting challenge. -- |
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
![]() |
anyone who said: Anyway, I rated the rules that were up and submitted a bunch. Thanks! We need as much input as we can get, especially from creative people If you're not the creative type, don't feel bad about not adding a lot of rules. (Everyone will thank you for not doing so!) But please go through and rate as many as you have time for. You can come back from time to time and rate the new rules. Quote: I see I can get one requirement stating there is no requirement, and another stating an additional requirement! Not a big deal, sure, but I figured I'd mention it. While the Rule-O-Matic could possibly bring conflicting rules, human intervention will prevent it from being a problem. A Rule-O-Matic spin page has been added. It will be tweaked a lot as rules get added and rated. It tries to pick rules that are more popular, but still giving lesser ones a chance. |
Dennis
Member #1,090
July 2003
![]() |
Quote: The game should contain no text..... It would eliminate the "Internationalization(mininum 2 languages supported) Rule", so the spinning should make sure that these two rules could not be in at the same time. --- 0xDB | @dennisbusch_de --- |
Richard Phipps
Member #1,632
November 2001
![]() |
I rated all the rules Matthew. I think you have enough now to do the competition. |
Jakub Wasilewski
Member #3,653
June 2003
![]() |
I rated everything I could, added some of my own. Most of the rules that were already there were good enough, but I rated most of those I remembered from previous Speedhacks "bad". I don't think I want repetition. X-G said:
["no text" rule] That reminded me of a game called Live-a-Live by... by Square, I think. One of the chapters was set in prehistoric times, and the method of communication was identical to that you described. It was done perfectly and many "conversations" held in picture language made me laugh. I'm sure that exact rule would produce many interesting entries. --------------------------- |
da_flo
Member #1,907
February 2002
![]() |
By the way, as I am rating rules, I am seeing many rules that have been chosen by the Rule-O-Matic in the previous speedhacks. |
Elias
Member #358
May 2000
|
Hm, is there a way to re-rate a rule I think I accidently mis-rated? -- |
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
Did I miss something? Most of the links refer to last year's compo. And the Rule-o-matic links don't take me anywhere. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
FMC
Member #4,431
March 2004
![]() |
Rated all rules and added a new one but i don't know if i'll be able to enter the contest. [FMC Studios] - [Caries Field] - [Ctris] - [Pman] - [Chess for allegroites] |
GullRaDriel
Member #3,861
September 2003
![]() |
Rated all, but i saw some awesome one's. Just for these, go do your contrib' and rate them all... "Code is like shit - it only smells if it is not yours" |
Marcello
Member #1,860
January 2002
![]() |
Hah. We should have a contest which has as many of the rules as possible and the goal is to come up with a game idea that works. Marcello |
Derezo
Member #1,666
April 2001
![]() |
I've voted. It seems to be spinning relatively good rules. Some of these rules sound tough, though. "He who controls the stuffing controls the Universe" |
Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
![]() |
Quote: Quote: Not at all, if there's no text in the game all the languages in the world are automatically supported. Though, the intern... rule would be rather useless, it doesn't make them incompatible. |
BAF
Member #2,981
December 2002
![]() |
No need to tweak the spinner, good rule sets seem to be coming up Anyway, I rated a bunch and added a few, I'm going back to rate and add more |
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
![]() |
Quote: By the way, as I am rating rules, I am seeing many rules that have been chosen by the Rule-O-Matic in the previous speedhacks. With the exception of Bonus Rules, previously used rules won't be recycled. Quote: Hm, is there a way to re-rate a rule I think I accidently mis-rated? No. In the big picture, a couple mistaken ratings won't hurt. I wanted to keep the interface as simple as possible. Quote: Did I miss something? Most of the links refer to last year's compo. And the Rule-o-matic links don't take me anywhere. Some of the links are still from last year (participants & download link), but the Rule-O-Matic links should be visible and working. I'd try clearing the browser's cache. |
|
|