|
|
| dosbert2001's name |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
W AH, that's s freaky! In maths club today, I offered that decreasing bases puzzle. They got it with a little (read: lots of) help from me... but then my teacher just came out with 1, 11, 21, ... - that exact same puzzle! I still didn't figure it out without help... -- |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
Quote: (there also would be an infinite number of prime numbers ,and i heart a rumor somewhere that there aren't any more prime numbers beond 10^10^10^10^10^10 or so,just a rumor,i should ask one of the mathematicians)
Someone like me? Let p1,p2,p3,...,pn be the first n prime numbers (p1=2,p2=3,p3=5,...). q = p1*p2*p3*...*pn q is therefore divisible by all the prime numbers up to pn. So q + 1 divided by any prime number up to pn gives a remainder of 1, so q + 1 is prime. Therefore, given a set of all prime numbers up to a particular size, there will always be another prime number that's greater. Hence there are an infinite number of primes. -- |
|
23yrold3yrold
Member #1,134
March 2001
|
Man, I feel so stupid when someone goes into math theory mode like that. I understand it, but I couldn't have come up with it to save my miserable life. -- |
|
bill_mcniff
Member #1,105
March 2001
|
I found this cool website with a nice free engine. with similar to C style code its called VERGE maybe some of you have heard of it VERGE ENGINE WEBSITE |
|
Shade
Member #1,152
April 2001
|
bdavis: |
|
X-G
Member #856
December 2000
|
Umm... 16? (two previous numbers times two.. of course, this assumes the non-existant number before 1 is zero) -- |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
Those solutions are all very well, but they don't explain why the number you have to find is the only other number in the set. Any more suggestions? Clue: a kid could do this 23yrold3yrold: Don't worry, I didn't come up with that. I just quoted it -- |
|
Bob
Free Market Evangelist
September 2000
|
This is still about 1,2,6...? Ok, I'll give it a shot. I'd say 12, and here's why: -- |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
Nope. How can you be sure that's the last number in the set? Hehe, I seem to have you all baffled. And this is S [ May 22, 2001: Message edited by: bdavis ] -- |
|
PrimeSide
Member #687
September 2000
|
Ooh! ooh! Is it 10? One has three letters, two is the next to have three letters, then six, and lastly ten. |
|
Goodbytes
Member #448
June 2000
|
Hey! I get it! The last number is 3! |
|
Goodbytes
Member #448
June 2000
|
Well, PrimeSide seems to have it figured out, so here's a new puzzle that I made up(I feel so special that I made it up ) |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
Congratulations, PrimeSlide! -- |
|
Goodbytes
Member #448
June 2000
|
bdavis: H3y! I was only joking!!!!!3 ;3 |
|
lambik
Member #899
January 2001
|
Heh, I would never have guessed that one. |
|
X-G
Member #856
December 2000
|
goodbytes: -- |
|
Shade
Member #1,152
April 2001
|
and another one... |
|
Shade
Member #1,152
April 2001
|
X-G:nemo custudiet ipsos custudes. |
|
lambik
Member #899
January 2001
|
Lucky guess: 7? |
|
Shade
Member #1,152
April 2001
|
Nope,it's not seven. |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
Hmm... -- |
|
Shade
Member #1,152
April 2001
|
thx bdavis,i was also concidering the word verticles(but that would have been really wrong) |
|
Goodbytes
Member #448
June 2000
|
X-G: Nope |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
Shade, you're into astronomy? Then I have a question (not a puzzle, a question I have a game where the stars are placed as in real life; all the constellations are there. However, I seriously doubt that my stopgap solution has placed the stars at their correct distances. So either: 1. Do you know of a downloadable star catalogue containing the distance of each star, or: 2. Do you know of one with sufficient information to work it out, and how would I do this? Thanks [ May 23, 2001: Message edited by: bdavis ] -- |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
Goodbytes: it seems it's optional; you can have 'nibble' or 'nybble' -- |
|
|
|