![]() |
|
Snake on wine |
J-Gamer
Member #12,491
January 2011
![]() |
nvm... I had an uninitialised boolean in the snake update, which defaults to false in debug mode, but no such luck in wine. Fixed. " There are plenty of wonderful ideas in The Bible, but God isn't one of them." - Derezo |
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
My first thought: Serpent au vin ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
weapon_S
Member #7,859
October 2006
![]() |
I'll defend C(++) happily I think the "don't pay for what you don't use"-principle is great. Even if it means your variables aren't guaranteed to be initialized. Or in other words: if you don't need an initial value, you won't be forced to assign one. I agree there are few cases where it will actually make a difference, and that there are cases where you can forget initializing. If there is any importance to initialization, though, it deserves a place in the code. And having to call upon an obscure directive to disable initialization, or even not being able to do it, just seems like a misfeature to me.
Serpent au vin turned up 2 results in google. |
|