|
|
| Earth Day, the media crock |
|
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
|
What upsets me is that none of the "go green" hype is really solving the root of the problem. I'm a little dismayed at how advertising and broadcasting companies are spinning their products to look green instead of it actually being green. It's doing the same thing but calling it different, or at best causing only marginal changes. If anybody saw the John Stuart show yesterday, the "moment of zen" was when a magician turned Elmo green with the wave of a wand, as if painting yourself green is all it takes to improve our environment. Some examples: 1. 'clean coal' would be better described as 'just slightly less than dirty coal'. On top of that, I saw some Earth Day report by a CNN correspondent about what you can do, and it was all a bunch of weak-sauce baloney just like the tech correspondent. One of his suggestions was "get a glass cup and wash it instead of using plastic cups." Really. REALLY!?? The whole thing is making me upset, and causes me to ask "is there anything that we can really do?" -- |
|
Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
|
Of course there are things we can do. The problem is that no one wants to spend the money to do them. We'll continue the way we're going until it becomes profitable to go another way. Hopefully someone will realize that it's profitable to not all die and decide to spend the money necessary to keep the Earth in a state that can support human life.
|
|
count
Member #5,401
January 2005
|
It's like Mr. Smith said in the Matrix. WE (the humans) are the virus destroying the world.
|
|
Sol Blast
Member #9,655
April 2008
|
Mark Oates said: 3. someone who separates their trash to recycle, thinking that will make a difference. Why won't it? |
|
Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
|
Christopher Bludau said: WE (the humans) are the virus destroying the world. Now isn't that an egocentric view. As if we've done anything to threaten the existence of the world. We've merely threatened our own existence, along with most of the rest of life on Earth. The planet will still be here no matter what we do.
|
|
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
|
Sol Blast said: Why won't it? My understanding is that the benefits are incredibly marginal. Even if everyone in the entire world did it. -- |
|
Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
|
Quote: It's marginal. Every little bit helps. Recycling alone may not do much, but it may turn out to be that one tiny little snowflake that starts the avalanche of us not all dying. EDIT: Stop editing while I'm responding to you, dammit!
|
|
count
Member #5,401
January 2005
|
Neil Black said: The planet will still be here no matter what we do.
Yea. The planet will still be here. Some species more or less makes no diffrences
|
|
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
|
Neil Black said: Stop editing while I'm responding to you, dammit! sorry. I'm a bit of a re-re-re-edit type personality. -- |
|
Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
|
Quote: I'm a bit of a re-re-re-editor type personality. I get that way sometimes, too. That's why I always make sure to mark my edits, because I know how confusing it can be if someone's response doesn't match my post.
|
|
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
|
Neil Black said: it may turn out to be that one tiny little snowflake that starts the avalanche of us not all dying. I'm saying we're not talking about the mountain. -- |
|
Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
|
Mark Oates said: I'm saying we're not talking about the mountain. And I'm saying don't dis the snowflake.
|
|
mEmO
Member #1,124
March 2001
|
Neil Black said: Every little bit helps. No, no it doesn't. It's like premature optimization; it doesn't help to reduce the time your rendering function takes by 1ms if you have a blocking call in your networking code. (this analogy assumes a single threaded approach, of course) --------------------------------------------- |
|
Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
|
mEmO said: this analogy assumes a single threaded approach, of course And thus it fails. It is wrong if all we do is recycle. But it is not wrong to recycle as a small part of a much larger effort.
|
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
Mark Oates said: The whole thing is making me upset, and causes me to ask "is there anything that we can really do?" Uhm... yeah. You can do all the small things that are within your control. Oh wait? Do you think that each individual can solve the problem from the very top? Or do you think there's some person at the top that needs to do it for you? |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Probably the most impact you can have as an individual is to lobby local body and national government to introduce legislation to stop industry from causing so much damage. There are hundreds of thousands of companies that throw away more recyclable goods in a day than what an individual could recycle in a month. Likewise, residential pollution is insignificant compared to industrial pollution. Probably the biggest obstacle to overcome with this however is the governments of developing nations who are happy to have their environment destroyed if it means they can entice corporations to move their manufacturing base there. But for comapnies that can't do that, the best way to get them to shape up is to make it cheaper for them to operate cleanly than to act wastefully, and that requires hitting them with hefty fines for environmental infractions.
|
|
Onewing
Member #6,152
August 2005
|
As Dr. House would say, "People don't change." Hopefully, the "Going Green" trend will at least be a start in opening people's eyes to the changes we're going to have to make eventually, even if it isn't really changing anything now. Actually, Al Gore is the real start. ------------ |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
|
Those asteroid strikes (that are down to every few million years by now) and other stuff such as the Yellowstone supervolcano make our puny efforts to ruin the ecology look lame, we're just taking ourselves too seriously. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Mark Oates said: someone who separates their trash to recycle, thinking that will make a difference. That depends entirely on the trash. Some things make a huge difference[1], some not at all. It also depends on the waste infrastructure already in place. For example, everything that's even remotely combustible[2] goes right in the trash for me, since I get it back in the form of remote heating (my city runs both a remote heating plant and a biogas plant entirely on garbage). You also have to keep in mind that recycling is about saving on two[3] different things: resources and energy. You have to look at the benefits of both to decide if it's worth it or not - nowadays, people have a tendency to be so CO2 fixated that they forget all about resource usage. References
-- |
|
GameCreator
Member #2,541
July 2002
|
My cynical side tends to think that this is merely a way for people to feel good about themselves. After all, what's the alternative? Tell people that there's really nothing useful they can do? Sure, go save the world. Why not?
|
|
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
{"name":"598333","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/b\/7\/b796e23723251de2c2b547e4b5712ac1.png","w":420,"h":600,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/b\/7\/b796e23723251de2c2b547e4b5712ac1"} ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
|
FrankyR
Member #243
April 2000
|
GameCreator said: My cynical side tends to think that this is merely a way for people to feel good about themselves. I definitely get that feeling a lot too (especially when it comes to some recycling). I completely with Mark's sentiment about the media's effort to try and capitalize on the whole Earth day thing to improve their image. On a side note, I find it interesting how The Daily Show seems to have been changing from satirizing politics to satirizing the media lately. I actually really like the way they're doing it, and it seems so easy...most of the time all they need to do to make a joke is show a clip from any of the cable news networks because they crap they say sometimes is so ridiculous. |
|
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
|
I've decided my life has immense meaning and that I am so important that I must act now to save the world from destruction!!!! ... or was that just the 007 film I watched? |
|
ixilom
Member #7,167
April 2006
|
I don't care. I wont be here century. [edit] ___________________________________________ |
|
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
|
I like to use EXTRA energy just to make somebody's hour worthless. No, I'm kidding, but I wouldn't hold it against somebody that did. I think I'm relatively energy conservative as is. I don't make sacrifices, but I try to be careful not to waste resources. Most people don't so their hour doesn't compare to the countless resources they waste the rest of the year. I don't practice Earth Day. -- acc.js | al4anim - Allegro 4 Animation library | Allegro 5 VS/NuGet Guide | Allegro.cc Mockup | Allegro.cc <code> Tag | Allegro 4 Timer Example (w/ Semaphores) | Allegro 5 "Winpkg" (MSVC readme) | Bambot | Blog | C++ STL Container Flowchart | Castopulence Software | Check Return Values | Derail? | Is This A Discussion? Flow Chart | Filesystem Hierarchy Standard | Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons | How To Use Header Files | GNU/Linux (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo) | rot (rot13, rot47, rotN) | Streaming |
|
|
|