|
|
| New Year resolutions for 2007 (list'em) |
|
Rampage
Member #3,035
December 2002
|
Quote: The funny part is, I'd originally typed "accurace" instaed of "accuracy," and I was attempting tot correct it.
I'd make a comment about this sentence, but then I'd look like a nerd. -R |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Quote: You need to quit posting now What I really need to do is get off my ass and go to the chemist to get my sleeping pill perscription filled. I'm approcahing 100 hours without sleep,a nd as you've noticed, it has effects.
|
|
HardTranceFan
Member #7,317
June 2006
|
Quote: I'm approcahing 100 hours without sleep
How the hell do you manage that -- |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
Quote: It's not the nerd's fault they're gifted But when you talk, it's quite obvious your "intellectual superiority" is nothing but an inflated ego. That sentence should be: It's not the nerd's fault he's gifted or It's not the nerds' fault they're gifted. The word they is not a singular, gender neutral pronoun in English. It's plural. I know you and your ego are almost like two separate things, but you really still only count as one! |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Quote: How the hell do you manage that ? I have a somewhat abnormal brain chemistry. Basically, my brain just doesn't respond to signals that my body is tired and needs to sleep. So while I'm very tired physically (my normal 45 minute walk home from work last night took me over an hour), my brain is still very much active (though it's not working at full efficiency). Before I started the sleeping medication, my usual pattern would be to stay awake for five or six days, and then sleep for about half a day. I think the longest I ever went without sleeping was nine days.
|
|
nonnus29
Member #2,606
August 2002
|
Quote:
How the hell do you manage that He must mean '100 hours without lieing down and sleeping for 8 hours'. You can survive on 2-3 hour naps, I've done it for weeks at a time. Once you get used to it it's not so bad. |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Quote: He must mean '100 hours without lieing down and sleeping for 8 hours'. Nope, I didn't. (see above post)
|
|
Derezo
Member #1,666
April 2001
|
Although it looks like the thread has been derailed, I hate new years resolutions. Having said that, my new years resolution is to quit gambling and cut back significantly on my drinking habit. This year I would like to be more financially responsible. My finances have gone from great to horrible over the past 4 years and I'd like to correct it. This decision wasn't made as a new years resolution though, I decided this when I lost over $2,300 in 2 hours at the Casino betting table max ($100) on three seats in blackjack. I'm not lending anyone any money this year, either. People are fucking idiots. "He who controls the stuffing controls the Universe" |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
But I thought you always made lots of money when you gambled. What kind of girlfriend doesn't like that? Every gambler I've ever known has always come out ahead. Then he mysteriously sells his house, gets divorced, and lives in the gutters... |
|
Derezo
Member #1,666
April 2001
|
The problem is that I can't avoid the house games (blackjack/craps). Otherwise I'd continue playing poker. Poker is profitable, but not as much as it use to be. I made a killing from July-October 2005, but then a lot of the walking ATM machines (as I call them) stopped playing poker and a couple of them started playing better. I can only pull a few hundred bucks a month these days, if I'm lucky. It used to be about $80-$300 per night 8/10 nights. It's not as fun either. There are more jerks playing than before and the number of piss poor players has reduced significantly. "He who controls the stuffing controls the Universe" |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
So it's not as much as gambling, as it is stealing from the above mentioned people. |
|
Derezo
Member #1,666
April 2001
|
They give their money willfully. They just don't understand what "fold" means. "He who controls the stuffing controls the Universe" |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
I suppose the same could be said about con artists who get old people to give them money... In a way, they are willing, but you know they are just being suckers. Most bad gamblers are just addicts. That's the thing I have against habitual gambling. First, as you mentioned, playing the luck games will never be profitable. They are all rigged so that the casinos maintain their profit. Even if it was 51-49, you'd come out a loser. Then you can go into the skill games against other people. Obviously there's some luck involved, but it's minimal. You'd never want to play against a person who was obviously better than you. You'd just lose money. To feel the best about yourself, you'd want to play a fair match against equal opponents. But then you're not going to make any money either. Assuming you do play with relatively equal opponents, you'll break even. So then, you get tempted to play against and target obviously inferior foes. Sure you can make money, but to me it's more like you're robbing an addict out of his cash and helping him destroy his life. Of course you can try to rationalize that by saying "someone else would do it" or "he doesn't have to come," but to me, it's not any different than taking advantage of a crack addict. |
|
HardTranceFan
Member #7,317
June 2006
|
Quote: But when you talk, it's quite obvious your "intellectual superiority" is nothing but an inflated ego. That sentence should be: It's not the nerd's fault he's gifted or It's not the nerds' fault they're gifted.
One lousy misplaced apostrophy, and I'm relegated to the level of intellectually deficient with a supersized ego. Oh the hurt and the pain. -- |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
It's a hard life being an intellectual. |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Quote: That sentence should be: It's not the nerd's fault he's gifted or It's not the nerds' fault they're gifted.
Why do you assume the nerd is a he?
|
|
Rampage
Member #3,035
December 2002
|
There are no nerd girls, it's a law of the universe. -R |
|
Neil Walker
Member #210
April 2000
|
If I ever did have a new years resolution, it would be to pay off my mortgage before the year's out Neil. wii:0356-1384-6687-2022, kart:3308-4806-6002. XBOX:chucklepie |
|
HardTranceFan
Member #7,317
June 2006
|
But girls can be geeks? Meaning geek != nerd? -- |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
Quote: Why do you assume the nerd is a he? I was going to also point out the correct way of gender neutrality, but didn't want to get too verbose. Before feminism, nobody cared. Female authors typically used she and male authors typically used he, and everyone was happy. But now, one is supposed to say "he or she" to be politically correct. If you are writing something lengthy, you are supposed to alternate your examples between male and female people. But I stick with using masculine when it's probably a male person or the ambiguoity doesn't hurt and feminine when it's probably a female person. In cases where I want to be clear I'm including both genders, I'll use the cumbersome "he or she." |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Quote: There are no nerd girls, it's a law of the universe. I guess my high-school class was in another universe then. Nb: There seem to be many different meanings of the words nerd and geek, some interchangable, others not. In my cultural circle, a nerd is someone who is overly studious, and usually of above-average intelligence. So in this contect, a female nerd isn't uncommon. I suspect when you say nerd, you mean what we would call a geek - someone who has an abnormal interest in technology (especially computing).
|
|
Myrdos
Member #1,772
December 2001
|
Quote: I'm sure we're all much less dense IRL. Erm, of course. Of... course. Now if you'll excuse me, I have some free-style rapping to do in preparation for my next social engagement. __________________________________________________ |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
I've always thought of nerds as intellectuals who have no social life ("book worms"), whereas geeks are people who proudly display their obsessions of computers, anime, comic books, or whatever. (The obsession must be something semi-intellectual or otherwise similar abnormal category.) I would consider myself something of a computer/hacker nerd, whereas someone who dresses up as star wars characters falls more on the geeky scale. |
|
Myrdos
Member #1,772
December 2001
|
geek: a person often of an intellectual bent who is disliked; an enthusiast or expert especially in a technological field or activity nerd: an unstylish, unattractive, or socially inept person; especially : one slavishly devoted to intellectual or academic pursuits So you have it backwards: it's geeks who are the cool ones.* *Unless you find yourself biting the heads off chickens. That's not cool. __________________________________________________ |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
Those definitions are similar to mine, but I don't think that first part of the definition of geek is very good. Basically it's saying they are the same thing, except the geek is not socially inept (and thus is disliked). Quote: I seem to remember reading that years ago, a person who would prefer to read a book on a plane instead of conversing with their fellow passengers, or engaging in sing-alongs, would be considered a geek. That would make him a nerd by your definition. I think of geeks as having fewer social problems than nerds, but often making a fool of themselves by their obsession with whatever their field of "expertise" is. |
|
|
|