|
|
| The anti-christmascard |
|
Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
|
It was normal to die around 30-40, I would've been considered an old man if I lived then. But if you lived past 40 you could live on just as long as the oldest people today. Some people just have it in them to live a long life. As for the bible, my humble opinion is that it's just a tool created by man in order to control people. Religion probably didn't mean anything more than a route to power for those who created it. Christianity really doesn't give of much shininess when it comes to spirituality. Buddhism, hinduism, asatru, american natives belief in nature etc. all have some form of spiritual base. They all try to show people a path to improvement while christianity just acts like a big brother society that makes you feel guilty no matter how you live your life. As I see it, if you were totally free of religion and had to choose one. Christianity sure hits rock bottom on the list. It looks totally pointless and has no unique selling point. If it was a game, only idiots would pay for it. |
|
OICW
Member #4,069
November 2003
|
Trezker: you think in similar way as I do. [My website][CppReference][Pixelate][Allegators worldwide][Who's online] |
|
Jakub Wasilewski
Member #3,653
June 2003
|
Religion was once banned as a topic of discussion in the Allegro.cc Forums (along with politics). With good reason, it seems. I just don't think it's possible to hold an intelligent discussion about religion - both side's arguments are void for the other side, and eventually, one of the sides forgets about any sort of respect for other people's beliefs. How about reinstating the ban? --------------------------- |
|
OICW
Member #4,069
November 2003
|
Jakub: that's not a bad idea. Besides I have nothing to say to this topic, since I know that theese discussions are pointless and my sig should be applied to them. Oh I must sincerely and frankly admit that as long as someone doesn't force me to believe his religion I have respect for him... [My website][CppReference][Pixelate][Allegators worldwide][Who's online] |
|
Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
|
Yeah, the believers will never see beyond the mist of belief and always spam on with the same pointless and mostly invalid arguments. The intelligent conversation just gets lost in the masses since most people are idiots. Only a few of us have broken through a barrier of awareness and see the potential of mankind. Sadly, mankind may very well destroy itself before it breaks through that barries as a race. If mankind ever becomes an intelligent race, communism will finally be possible. |
|
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
Quote: both side's arguments are void for the other side Probably because they don't discuss the same thing. And neither side knows that. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
|
Kibiz0r
Member #6,203
September 2005
|
Quote: The intelligent conversation just gets lost in the masses since most people are idiots. Only a few of us have broken through a barrier of awareness and see the potential of mankind. Sadly, mankind may very well destroy itself before it breaks through that barries as a race. If mankind ever becomes an intelligent race, communism will finally be possible. And if we can't? If we blow ourselves up over something we made up in the first place -- be it money, territory, or religion -- is it really a bad thing? I figure, as long as we go quietly and don't take the entire planet with us, it's all good. We've had our go and blatantly failed so far; if we can't, or won't, redeem ourselves, then the planet as a whole is better off. Let some other species have a shot at it. --- |
|
Onewing
Member #6,152
August 2005
|
Wow, what a funny thread. It seems the non-christian team (not mentioning how far they out number the opposing team) have scored quite a few more points, despite a few irrelevant arguments. I'd try to shoot a three pointer to bring us back in the game, but gnolam's a friggin' tall foe. I'd rather just suck on my thumb. Anyway, can't we all just get a long. Yes, I mean a "long", not "along". Pssh, I said I'd rather suck on my thumb...
[that's me sucking on my thumb...well, licking it...] ------------ |
|
FrankyR
Member #243
April 2000
|
Quote: Probably because they don't discuss the same thing. And neither side knows that.
I really like that statement. I'm going to use it sometime |
|
23yrold3yrold
Member #1,134
March 2001
|
I like to think I do, since I used to be the other side. -- |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
AriesNL said:
The way you talk about Witchcraft and wicca tells me you know nothing about it except some "faitytales" you've been told If you truely want to know what witchcraft is, read a good book about it.
AriesNL, translated, said: You're wrong you're wrong but I'm not going to give any arguments LALALACAN'THEARYOU
</li> -- |
|
Jonatan Hedborg
Member #4,886
July 2004
|
Kill it with fire! (the thread that is) Religious and political discussions never "work out". No one will "win". No one will change their minds about their personal views. Lets let the Christians believe in their little magical prophet and let the atheists/pagans/whateverians burn in hell or whatever it's at stake here. Just close the darn thread and ban religious and political discussions
|
|
manjula
Member #3,569
June 2003
|
And so this is Christmas A very Merry Christmas |
|
OICW
Member #4,069
November 2003
|
From my point of view religion is generaly bad - just see what it does among us, or, what is more, in the world (think of crusades, Jihad, ...). Howg. [My website][CppReference][Pixelate][Allegators worldwide][Who's online] |
|
Kibiz0r
Member #6,203
September 2005
|
Maybe there should just be one megathread for religious discussion. I don't think banning it, period, will stop the urge to discuss it. At least this way we can keep it contained? Argh, there's a bat outside my window and it's driving me insane with its incessant yelling. --- |
|
Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
|
That the god Brangur's bat, he's keeping an eye on you! |
|
23yrold3yrold
Member #1,134
March 2001
|
Quote: Maybe there should just be one megathread for religious discussion. I don't think banning it, period, will stop the urge to discuss it. At least this way we can keep it contained? Maybe we should make a seperate forum for it. On another web site! Yeah! I wonder if that's been done before .... -- |
|
Kibiz0r
Member #6,203
September 2005
|
Quote: Maybe we should make a seperate forum for it. On another web site! Yeah! I wonder if that's been done before .... Hilarious, you. If people want to discuss it, they're already atheists. And what's the point of going "Theists are dumb!" "Yeah, theists are dumb!" "I agree!"? And that's why a fairly neutral place like allegro.cc is appealing. I understand that a lot of people don't want to talk about it, but if people did talk about it, wouldn't everyone be better off? Imagine if scientists all did their own independent experiments and never shared their discoveries. We'd still be in the stone age! --- |
|
23yrold3yrold
Member #1,134
March 2001
|
Quote: Hilarious, you. If people want to discuss it, they're already atheists.
I am? Anyway, the main point is if you want to discuss it, there's no shortage of outlets. This one, for example Atheism, religion, evolution, you name it. -- |
|
Ariesnl
Member #2,902
November 2002
|
Quote: Religion was once banned as a topic of discussion in the Allegro.cc Forums (along with politics). With good reason, it seems. I just don't think t's possible to hold an intelligent discussion about religion - both side's arguments are void for the other side, and eventually, one of the sides forgets about any sort of respect for other people's beliefs. How about reinstating the ban? I think freedom of speech should outweight the small problems with certain persons;) @gnolam and anyone else who wants to know : Witchcraft is a religion but it's NOT a belief. So how do witches see the world?
As for the ten commandments, you can live to all ten of them and still treat people (or others) verry bad. What is Wicca ? In the 1950's Gerald Gardner "made" a new religion and he borrowed a lot of things from Witchcraft. Other religions: Witches strongly feel that everyone should be free to choose his / her religion. There is a lot more to tell about witchcraft but I hope I made some things clear, at least to those who want to know Perhaps one day we will find that the human factor is more complicated than space and time (Jean luc Picard) |
|
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
Quote: If people want to discuss it, they're already atheists. Yes. Or believers. Atheist: "Religion is stupid. It's not science." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
So, yeah, $NEOPAGANISM_VARIANT. Probably. I ask for a definition and I get... Nature's Harmonic Simultaneous 4-day Unspecific Rambling About Elements and Gaia. I now officially give up trying to get something decipherable out of that man. -- |
|
Ariesnl
Member #2,902
November 2002
|
- Witchcraft is more than 3000 years old so skip the "neo" Perhaps one day we will find that the human factor is more complicated than space and time (Jean luc Picard) |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Definitely! I mean, it's not like it's a bunch of heteregonous beliefs, each with a whopping great historical discontinuity, blended into one another when reconstructed by non-historians in modern days! I'd better go tell my archeologist buddies - they'll be thrilled to know of this! I mean, dude, 3000 years! ... so yeah, neopaganism, which means my previous posts still stand. And with that, the thread holds nothing more for me. -- |
|
Ariesnl
Member #2,902
November 2002
|
I think you mean Anthropologists and believe it or not the solstices are even older Witchcraft never discontinued. Perhaps one day we will find that the human factor is more complicated than space and time (Jean luc Picard) |
|
|
|