|
|
| Election Night 2016 |
|
Specter Phoenix
Member #1,425
July 2001
|
I see your point, with Trump winning the police are now corrupt by default and look the other way so I see where they no longer fear retribution for the illegal actions. One of the reports on the page proves that much. The mother that stated the police told her it was a school matter.
|
|
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
|
Way to miss the point and lash back with useless hyperbole. My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
|
Specter Phoenix
Member #1,425
July 2001
|
It's not hyperbole..police have been known to turn blind eyes to crimes based on what President is in office. With Trump being a blatant racist, sexist, et. al. it can be assumed that nothing would come from any police intervention. That one post just proved the point as assault and battery are not a school matter. They are encouraged by Trump's views and fear no retribution because they know the police likely won't do anything.
|
|
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
|
So I guess you were agreeing with me... my sarcasm detector is a little off it seems. Hardly to be unexpected with you playing Devil's advocate all this time. My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
|
ks
Member #1,086
March 2001
|
This unrest or hatred is on a different scale, orders of magnitude more visible and accessible - base instincts - than whatever happened with a bunch of gamers. I'm still completely clueless about the politics or social dynamic of that situation. In this case, at the very least Trump brings together the KKK and neo-nazis under the massive umbrella of President of the United States. Search for yesterday's comments by David Duke about the role played by those organizations. These groups are ever-present. What is clear and has been clear for some time is that in addition to the visible hate groups Trump has triggered or emboldened the "ordinary" who share the same views. Millions of US citizens have been scapegoated Blame can be assigned. We are not ruled by magic and mysticism. It's a matter of disentangling from noise consequently the fuzzy phrase "blame game" means little. Incidentally, the police in your country have begun to adopt a role beyond their civil contract with society, in part blending with the military - see transfer of surplus military gear. Initial stages, yes. What's remarkable is that this is after crime rates dropped as a product of enacted laws, not force, and presumably increased financial security as a whole. Any argument suggesting that heavy armament is required is ludicrous given history. I imagine that the first civil contracts enacted hundreds/thousands of years ago was meant to avoid military rule. Interesting transition. Anyway, your apolitical national police force actually interfered in the election. To indirectly answer your question, in general people are biased, and under certain circumstances that amounts to corruption. Three hours ago from the soon to be most powerful man on the planet (source Twitter): "Just had a very open and successful presidential election. Now professional protesters, incited by the media, are protesting. Very unfair!"
|
|
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
|
This is amusing. A bunch of people rant on social media that they've been harassed or assaulted and the world is supposed to believe that America is burning in the streets. On the other hand, maybe the Trump haters are just following the social justice handbook and crying because they didn't get their way. While I'm not doubting that there is hate and violence going on, it always has, and it always was. Especially in America. It's part of the goddamn culture. Trump did not create that. Trump is not responsible for it. Take responsibility for yourselves, and for fucks sake hold people accountable for their own actions. Blaming Trump for this is excusing their own actions. You're essentially apologizing for them. That is, assuming any of this stuff is actually happening. Twitter posts are evidence of nothing, and the only video I've seen was of a white man being assaulted by several black people while getting cheered on by onlookers (although, to be fair, I haven't look for anything, and only seen what was posted here). That doesn't exactly look very good for the "oppressed" side. Way to stay classy, America. It's actually not amusing. It's sickening. Get your shit together. You're not children. Stop acting like it. Append: As for the "grab her by the pussy" comment, that seems completely harmless to me. I cannot fathom why people would make such a big deal about it (assuming the video that Derezo posted was all of it). -- acc.js | al4anim - Allegro 4 Animation library | Allegro 5 VS/NuGet Guide | Allegro.cc Mockup | Allegro.cc <code> Tag | Allegro 4 Timer Example (w/ Semaphores) | Allegro 5 "Winpkg" (MSVC readme) | Bambot | Blog | C++ STL Container Flowchart | Castopulence Software | Check Return Values | Derail? | Is This A Discussion? Flow Chart | Filesystem Hierarchy Standard | Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons | How To Use Header Files | GNU/Linux (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo) | rot (rot13, rot47, rotN) | Streaming |
|
ks
Member #1,086
March 2001
|
By your own admission you don't pay attention to US politics. And, as I noted above the violence will likely flow in both directions - though likely three sources. Expected. The context is very social, incorporating identify and politics. It's worth noting that after the Brexit vote the same form of hatred was directed at those not clearly British. It wasn't restricted to non-whites as, for example, Polish workers were subject to a good deal of abuse. This simply is predictable stuff under any number of scenarios. In fact, we live in a country where historically the loss of a Stanley Cup could result in riots or a lot of damage. The loss of the game serves as a trigger where two sides often feed growing resentment for the other. What's being described here is an analogous situation where the trigger is more social, personal, with a hell of a lot of in-group-out-group dynamics. You might want to search for the phrase "dog whistle politics" then follow-up on the last 18 months in the US. The contest was alarmingly divisive. This is not about the "oppressed". You just made that up. A democrat is the sitting president, consequently that group would not logically identify as the oppressed. However, the Trump campaign cultivated the sense that the average, right leaning citizen, has been ignored by the out-of-touch and corrupt establishment (democrats and republicans), cheated by the foreign born worker, the illegal aliens, and the near impossible to vet muslims (potential terrorists) - citizens or not. This sense of being forgotten, without a voice, has always been present (though the faces may change depending on regime), hitting fever pitch with the rise of the Tea Party. For 1.5 years Trump stoked that same pent-up resentment, further amplified fear that has been growing in the US for the last 16 years, and now he is the President Elect. It's not particularly difficult to generate (short term) predictions while subtracting confounding factors.
|
|
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
|
I was not referring specifically to the Democrats as "oppressed". I was referring more specifically to in this instance, black people. While they are arguably oppressed in America still, the video evidence above does not suggest it. They're apparently not afraid to gang up on an unarmed (from what I could tell) man in the street, and even be caught on camera doing it (presumably, by their own peers since the people behind the camera seemed to be cheering it on). I don't suppose an oppressed class would do this unless they were suicidal (although, I guess it could also be explained by a lack of education). I've said it before and I'll say it again. "Left" or "right", "democrat" or "republican", "conservative" or "liberal". It's all completely fucking irrelevant. These are just labels and loose groupings of people that try to use tricks to get themselves into power. If you attach yourself strongly to any such label then you're just another puppet on strings. You'll be doomed to be tricked into empowering bad ideas. The political power is much bigger than a label, and regardless of which candidate gets elected the orders are likely coming from the same people: the extremely rich. If racism exists in America today on such a large scale then shame on you. Of course, we've discussed on numerous occasions the many social issues plaguing the USA. The education system is knowingly shit compared to most of the developed world, and it seems to show in all aspects of American life. There are plenty of smart Americans, but on average? If they compare to other developed nations' citizenry then they certainly have a funny way of showing it. Once again, none of it matters. It's smoke and mirrors. It has nothing to do with Trump. There are certainly social issues, but Trump is not responsible. They're nothing new. Fix your shit and stop making excuses. -- acc.js | al4anim - Allegro 4 Animation library | Allegro 5 VS/NuGet Guide | Allegro.cc Mockup | Allegro.cc <code> Tag | Allegro 4 Timer Example (w/ Semaphores) | Allegro 5 "Winpkg" (MSVC readme) | Bambot | Blog | C++ STL Container Flowchart | Castopulence Software | Check Return Values | Derail? | Is This A Discussion? Flow Chart | Filesystem Hierarchy Standard | Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons | How To Use Header Files | GNU/Linux (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo) | rot (rot13, rot47, rotN) | Streaming |
|
ks
Member #1,086
March 2001
|
The ugliness will always be there, mostly suppressed if ignored/marginalized, perhaps the only available solution. The Trump campaign adopted a very deliberate policy to give voice and release to what should be inhibited if the goal is a functioning society. The method employed points to expected or predictable outcomes which in this case was correlated with guaranteed votes. Again, as noted above, the campaign normalized sexism and racism for a large enough subset of the population insuring social instability, at least for the short term. The video was offense because it actually described, in personal historical terms, what is considered sexual assault.
|
|
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
|
The problem with "sexual assault" is that it's only assault if the receiver decides that it is. And there's a very complex bit of verbal and non-verbal communication that goes along with it. It's by no means trivial or black and white. Many women very much do not like guys to "ask permission" to kiss or touch. They want guys to be bold. Of course, if they like the guy then all is well. If they don't like the guy it's rape. This obviously puts men in a very difficult position. It's human nature, and unfortunately I don't think there's a simple solution. The most obvious solution to me would be to ask women to overcome their nature, and simply communicate straightly. Apparently that doesn't work for them though. The uncertainty is part of the chase and part of what makes them attracted to you (and it varies woman to woman, relationship to relationship). The alternative solution is to teach women to protect themselves by avoiding situations that they don't want to be in. Obviously, having protective men around women will help to temper daring boys and help to keep things under control. Unfortunately, the modern way of thinking about it is that women don't need that. Instead, we encourage girls to take care of themselves, ignoring the fact that they simply can't. What I distinctly remember in elementary school and high school was that the very guys that were bold and "touched" without permission were the guys that the girls liked and rewarded. The nice guys got nothing. The expression "nice guys finish last" is absolutely true. Women do not like nice guys. Certainly not young women. This is the ultimate downfall of Feminism. It doesn't fit. It doesn't work like that. No amount of political pressure can make it work. It goes against human nature. That's why the "bad boys" are always on top. It's not very fair, but then life isn't fair. -- acc.js | al4anim - Allegro 4 Animation library | Allegro 5 VS/NuGet Guide | Allegro.cc Mockup | Allegro.cc <code> Tag | Allegro 4 Timer Example (w/ Semaphores) | Allegro 5 "Winpkg" (MSVC readme) | Bambot | Blog | C++ STL Container Flowchart | Castopulence Software | Check Return Values | Derail? | Is This A Discussion? Flow Chart | Filesystem Hierarchy Standard | Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons | How To Use Header Files | GNU/Linux (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo) | rot (rot13, rot47, rotN) | Streaming |
|
Felix-The-Ghost
Member #9,729
April 2008
|
|
raynebc
Member #11,908
May 2010
|
More violent rioting, courtesy of the hateful, sore-loser brigade: But real violence supposedly pales in comparison to online posts about how people were spoken meanly to, doesn't it? |
|
m c
Member #5,337
December 2004
|
what would have happened on social media if the result and people were reversed? (\ /) |
|
ks
Member #1,086
March 2001
|
Ray: You appear to misunderstand the relationship between citizens and government/power. It is always, without exception, caveat emptor and vigilance. There should never be a period of grace.
|
|
Derezo
Member #1,666
April 2001
|
bamccaig said: The problem with "sexual assault" is that it's only assault if the receiver decides that it is. You are correct with part of your statement -- it is only assault if the sexual contact is unwanted -- but why is that a problem? If someone doesn't want you touching their sex organs then you DO NOT have the right and they DO decide if you are sexually assaulting them, or it if it is what we call "consensual", meaning that both of you agree. Quote: It's by no means trivial or black and white Sexual assault is not trivial, but there is a clear black and white quality to it. Unwanted sexual touching or language is not difficult to suppress, and if used on someone who does not want it that is assault. It's not as if they can lead you on, then you touch them, and that's sexual assault. No. If you walk up to a woman you don't know and the first thing you do is grab her by the genitals and kiss her on the mouth, you are very likely committing sexual assault. Quote: Many women very much do not like guys to "ask permission" to kiss or touch. If you're sitting on a couch watching a movie with a girl, you can do subtle things that will give you queues prior to kissing and grabbing her pussy. The first thing you can do is stretch you arm out and place it around her. If she pushes you away, DO NOT GRAB HER PUSSY!! This is sexual assault. "He who controls the stuffing controls the Universe" |
|
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
|
bamccaig said: While I'm not doubting that there is hate and violence going on, it always has, and it always was. Especially in America. It's part of the culture. Trump did not create that. Trump is not responsible for it. Take responsibility for yourselves, and for s sake hold people accountable for their own actions. Blaming Trump for this is excusing their own actions. You're essentially apologizing for them. Before Trump hate was part of the culture, but never before has it been so open and care free. Trump has enabled all of this behavior. Yes the people who take part in it are responsible for their own actions, but Trump is still responsible for making everyone feel okay about committing hate crimes. Trump won the presidency, and the very next day, people are spreading hate everywhere. Muslims are afraid to wear their veils. Immigrants are afraid of being deported. Blacks are in fear of their lives. Women have lost the right to respect of their person. And this is just in the first few days after Trump has been elected. Trump has caused a sweeping change in the attitudes of people about what is okay and what is not. Trump is clearly to blame for enabling this wave of hatred. If you can't see that, you're a brain dead brain washed idiot. bamccaig said: As for the "grab her by the pussy" comment, that seems completely harmless to me. I cannot fathom why people would make such a big deal about it (assuming the video that Derezo posted was all of it). That's clearly defined as sexual harassment and if he did it, it would be sexual assault. Donald Trump is a sexist, racist pig, and anyone who follows him is one too. What he said is not "completely harmless". It's not "locker talk". It's not okay. It's demeaning, intrusive, sexist, and evil. Women deserve respect, not to be treated like property or your favorite sex toy. raynebc said: But real violence supposedly pales in comparison to online posts about how people were spoken meanly to, doesn't it? Of course you're right, they're just being mean. Oh wait, actually they're threatening people's lives : Day 1 in Trump's America said:
How scared are u, u black bitch? This is just a taste of what happened yesterday. And you're going to sit there and say they're just being mean? Like it's a fucking joke? My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
|
Vanneto
Member #8,643
May 2007
|
That probably happens every day, like bam said. In capitalist America bank robs you. |
|
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
|
No, stuff like that doesn't happen every day. America is (was) for the most part very civil. Trump's win has started backlashes against minorities all over the country. I don't pick up on news because it' convenient for me. My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
|
raynebc
Member #11,908
May 2010
|
ks said: There should never be a period of grace. That doesn't mean there should be violence against civilians. Edgar Reynaldo said: Of course you're right, they're just being mean. Oh wait, actually they're threatening people's lives Or lots of them are fake, which wouldn't be unusual. And don't forget all the opposition calling for the death of Trump or those who voted for him. |
|
ks
Member #1,086
March 2001
|
Absolutely, violence is equally deplorable on both sides. As such, as it's not a particularly valuable variable in discussions like this - there is no point, it's a given.
|
|
raynebc
Member #11,908
May 2010
|
And blaming Trump for all the recent unrest is likewise stupid. |
|
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
|
raynebc said: Or lots of them are fake, which wouldn't be unusual. And don't forget all the opposition calling for the death of Trump or those who voted for him. If you read that twitter feed, you would see there's plenty of physical evidence. Do you honestly think that there is some mass conspiracy to fake evidence against Trump? Did you see the graffiti on that man's car? Did you see the other graffiti? Do you really think people are making this stuff up? I thought you were brighter than that. Your faith in Trump and his agenda are truly disappointing. Kids chanting racist slurs and people telling native born Americans to "go back to their own country"? raynebc said: That doesn't mean there should be violence against civilians. I agree, but there comes a breaking point. The KKK publically endorsed Trump because they know he's a racist. That there is a backlash from angry black people is no surprise. Again, I don't condone what the people in that video did. raynebc said: And blaming Trump for all the recent unrest is likewise stupid. They're his followers. They're following his lead. The blame rests on him for inciting racism and sexism. My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
|
ks
Member #1,086
March 2001
|
As noted, it is often best that base instincts be suppressed. The Trump campaign unlike any other in modern day US exploited traits that are typically controlled in civilized locales. Recall McCain in a 2008 town hall meeting attempting to silence a woman accusing Obama of being Muslim. Beginning in about 2011(?) Trump deliberately adopted the opposite strategy the form of birtherism, an approach to election contests that is avoided by most politicians. There was conscious intent to exploit the darker undercurrents of thought thereby stoking xenophobia among a particular demographic. The campaign provided a vehicle for that strategy to be expanded in scope. Trump is the catalyst. In sequence, he stoked hatred which has now led to resistance. That is, he won on hate and may also follow-up on those promises. Democracy should be an active process.
|
|
Polybios
Member #12,293
October 2010
|
Mark Oates said: Alrightie, here's my prediction for the results tomorrow.
Sent from my bubble. |
|
raynebc
Member #11,908
May 2010
|
Edgar Reynaldo said: If you read that twitter feed, you would see there's plenty of physical evidence. Photos of writing are not very compelling. Written slurs are often used in fake hate crimes. There was a picture of some bruises on a kid, but unless the punk that did that is reported it won't go anywhere. Is that one incident really the only physical evidence you have to present as violence from Trump supporters? Quote: The KKK publically endorsed Trump because they know he's a racist. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president Quote: They're his followers. They're following his lead. Trump is responsible for the violence of the anti-trump agitators? Are you sober? |
|
|
|