Allegro.cc - Online Community

Allegro.cc Forums » Off-Topic Ordeals » La connerie sans limite de l'homme...

This thread is locked; no one can reply to it. rss feed Print
 1   2 
La connerie sans limite de l'homme...
GullRaDriel
Member #3,861
September 2003
avatar

Sometime the human specie is somewhat bugged.

And it can't be helped. Another fucker did it.

That time he took a truck to run over people.

I and all who I know are safe, I feel lucky. We have a work base there, and it's some thousands people.

An English link:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/14/truck-crashes-into-crowd-at-bastille-day-celebrations-in-nice2/

I feel empty. I can't imagine how it can be stopped.

"Code is like shit - it only smells if it is not yours"
Allegro Wiki, full of examples and articles !!

beoran
Member #12,636
March 2011

First of all, this is really horrible. I condemn it strongly, for what little that is worth.

But to answer your question in an almost too practical way: we can stop this kind of attacks with large steel and concrete obstacles and vehicle pits. I just saw some photo's and it's a wide open walkway. Now that we know that some will resort to this kind of attacks, we'll have to be much more careful on how we construct and secure public walkways and squares. No thanks to this kind of people it will all become more costly and less beautiful, but I don't see how we could convince extremist not to do this kind of thing.

Dizzy Egg
Member #10,824
March 2009
avatar

I agree completely with beoran. We shouldn't have to wrap ourselves in steel and padding and fences, but these extremeists are beyond help, and what's most scary is they think they have a deity on their side. Scary, scary times.

----------------------------------------------------
Please check out my songs:
https://soundcloud.com/dont-rob-the-machina

jmasterx
Member #11,410
October 2009

They really should rewrite the headline as something like Terror Attack in Nice, France. Or something...

Reading it as Nice Terror Attack is just awful.

Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
avatar

What pisses me off the most is that everyone keeps reacting to these horrible events and then forgetting them and moving on.

If NOTHING CHANGES then they're going to keep happening over and over.

Build a wall. Build a peace float. Build a Stargate. I don't care. But for the love of God, CHANGE SOMETHING instead of pretending all of these terrorist attacks are completely unrelated "lone wolf" attacks--as if that implies there's no way to anticipate or prevent them. As if a look through last years headlines wouldn't hint at this years headlines.

Somewhere out there, there is an expert, with an expert opinion and solution to this mess, and nobody is listening to him or her. Give that person a microphone. Because at this rate, our governments are either completely stupid, or intentionally letting these attacks continue. There is no excuse for it to happen year after year to states with active, healthy governments, with healthy police, military, and intelligence forces.

When 9/11 hit, we changed so much we bombed countries that didn't even have anything to do with 9/11. Now, people get attacked and they just talk about "peace" like it's going to come out of no where. Somewhere in the MIDDLE of those two ideas is a balanced, rational plan for mitigating these attacks.

It's like how blind the USA is to school shootings. After Columbine (way back in 1999), the secret service published an investigation and guide to preventing future school shootings. They included NOT plastering the kid's photo on TV, NOT running 24/7 coverage, NOT running them nationwide (make it a local story only) and not making the kid look like an anti-hero. Why? Because they KNEW statistically that after every shooting, because of the media coverage, there would be a copy-cat killing the next week. It happens over and over every year and nobody cares. Apparently, people value shock and advertising dollars over the lives of children. The system never changes, so extra kids end up dead every year.

It's the exact same thing with terrorism. The solution is already out there, probably buried in a barely read government report. But nobody cares apparently.

-----sig:
“Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.” - Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
"Political Correctness is fascism disguised as manners" --George Carlin

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

The reality is that you cannot prevent these kinds of attacks. If there are people that feel desperate enough to commit acts like this then they're going to do it and there's nothing short of stripping everyone of their freedom that you can do to stop it. The solution isn't enforcement. The solution is addressing the root of the problem: that people feel so desperate to even think of committing such acts. There are always going to be mentally ill people and obviously it's very tricky to balance their rights with the safety of their peers. That said, I don't think that the average person can go from being a balanced member of society to running down 80 people in a truck overnight. That has to have been a process that brought that person to such an extreme and obviously nobody felt it was their duty, responsibility, or their ambition to offer them help. Or just didn't care enough to even notice. That's the problem.

It's a social problem. Pay attention to your neighbors. Not in a nosy, suspicious way. In a caring way. If they're going through hard times try to cheer them up. Spend time with them. Encourage them to seek professional help if you think they need it. There's nothing we can do to prevent mad men from doing harm. We can certainly try to prevent men from going mad in the first place. In any case, at the end of the day it's no threat to the human population or even the populations of a particular country. It's not really an emergency. It's just a moral dilemma. We hate to see suffering and want to try to stop it. If only we felt that same way before it went that far.

Erin Maus
Member #7,537
July 2006
avatar

bamccaig said:

There are always going to be mentally ill people and obviously it's very tricky to balance their rights with the safety of their peers.

All men are capable of horrors. Ordinary men, strong men, smart men, idealistic men, family men, pious men, old men, young men... They have all been perpetrators of atrocities, by some mechanism, in the past.

You can't say someone committing a horrible act in the name of some idea is abnormal--it's not, it's the norm. We have been committing horrors in the name of the state or faith or such things since we could organize together around ideas.

Saying only zealots, or the mentally ill, or the dispossessed, or whatever negative attribute you want, are capable of horrors denies the reality that all men are capable of given the right catalyst.

---
ItsyRealm, a quirky 2D/3D RPG where you fight, skill, and explore in a medieval world with horrors unimaginable.
they / she

GullRaDriel
Member #3,861
September 2003
avatar

I agree with Aaron.

"Code is like shit - it only smells if it is not yours"
Allegro Wiki, full of examples and articles !!

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

So your argument is that all men (I'll assume we're talking about human beings in general, not specifically males, or at least for the sake of argument we don't care about gender) are equally likely to commit heinous acts? One day a guy is living on cloud 9 and the next it's just, "FUCK THIS, FUCK YOU, DIEEEEEEEE"? And that guy is completely sane. I mean, he drives over the first 5, CLUNK, CLUNK, CLUNK, and he doesn't stop in immediate remorse for his actions. He doesn't panic at he sound and drop the clutch and stall it. He hammers on it and keeps going. He's "ordinary". I mean, most of us don't do that. But it's ordinary. I don't know. I find that hard to swallow.

I disagree. That's not ordinary. I can justify that as one of two scenarios, and maybe I'm missing others. Either you're crazy and you can't comprehend the consequences of your actions or you're desperate and don't care. Arguably neither person is completely sane at the moment, though the latter might well be normally sane and may be reacting irrationally in the moment. I won't rule out the possibility that it's just an asshole, but I think that to end your life over something so meaningless your CPU has to be skipping instructions.

I'm not denying that all people are capable of horrible, horrible things. They usually commit them when they're in a position of unchallenged power. It's much more rare for people to commit them when they're guaranteed to end up powerless to defend themselves. Unless again they're crazy and can't process that idea. Or desperate and just don't care.

I don't know. Is it just the mental space that I'm right now? What are you guys thinking this person was trying to do? I don't see any goal in it other than saying "fuck you" to the world on his way out of it.

Erin Maus
Member #7,537
July 2006
avatar

bamccaig said:

I'll assume we're talking about human beings in general, not specifically males, or at least for the sake of argument we don't care about gender

You must have subpar reading comprehension skills to even humor the assumption that men was the gendered form, not the general form referring to human.

The rhetorical impact of my post would be ruined by using anything but men.

Quote:

So your argument is that all men are equally likely to commit heinous acts?

All men are capable of horrible acts.

Quote:

I disagree. That's not ordinary. I can justify that as one of two scenarios, and maybe I'm missing others. Either you're crazy and you can't comprehend the consequences of your actions or you're desperate and don't care. Arguably neither person is completely sane at the moment, though the latter might well be normally sane and may be reacting irrationally in the moment.

Are you saying the millions who herded people like animals into concentration camps because of their religion or ethnicity or sexual orientation or disability are not ordinary? Are you saying the military that enabled the USSR and that forced the will of the USSR are not ordinary men? Are you saying the hundreds of thousands--millions--in the KGB, or the CIA, or acting for the KGB or CIA, who would go on to commit acts of terror against their neighbors and across the world are not ordinary? Are you saying the men in Vietnam, on either side, who would wipe out villages or massacre POWs or whatever else, are not ordinary men?

---
ItsyRealm, a quirky 2D/3D RPG where you fight, skill, and explore in a medieval world with horrors unimaginable.
they / she

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

It's not really important if crazy is ordinary. Crazy is crazy. Most of us would argue that religious people are delusional. There's literally billions -- the majority of the population. They're not as crazy as say a schizophrenic, but they're still crazy. Many of them in the West, for example, think that talking to themselves, inside or out loud, is them having a conversation with a magical man in the sky. That's crazy if I've ever heard it.

You said abnormal. I said crazy.

I would very much be in favor of telling your religious friends that their beliefs are unreasonable and unhealthy. The more of us do that the less crazy fuckers we'll develop.

{"name":"atheist_terrorists_-_Google_Search.jpg","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/b\/2bfbeb84bf1e8a07b83152f9c93bfdbb.jpg","w":916,"h":638,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/b\/2bfbeb84bf1e8a07b83152f9c93bfdbb"}atheist_terrorists_-_Google_Search.jpg

It's ordinary too for people to be selfish animals, but it's also ordinary for us to go beyond that when giving the opportunity. Most of us are far from perfect, but we still wouldn't massacre random strangers trivially. We're all capable of it, but it would take serious provocation or a long period of depression to trigger it.

Again, all of these things can be helped without enforcement. Helping one another and caring for one another. Which I'd argue also means caring enough to tell people when they're being crazy. Crazy thoughts can lead to crazy justifications for terrible things.

beoran
Member #12,636
March 2011

Well I think I see what Aaron is getting at: the punch clock villain. It's the mild mannered person who takes care of his family, goes to work, and then does the bookkeeping of the extermination camps' finances. Or a programmer who improves the embedded software on missile so it will do more damage. If you feel detached enough from the ones who are suffering, then anyone can casually contribute to killing others, really. And it's true that historically speaking punch clock villains were responsible for or at least enabled many of the most horrible slaughters in history.

However, the guy who did that was definitely not a punch clock villain. But he was also not insane or at least, not directly so. He was a religious extremist. If someone can make you believe that you can achieve eternal bliss, then you will do anything to achieve it. Even if it means killing some "unbelievers". Or even some "believers", your Deity will sort them out for you after all... History is full with examples that amply demonstrate this. :(

Erin Maus
Member #7,537
July 2006
avatar

bamccaig, you are no less delusional than the religious you decry. You're just foolish to think you are somehow superior because you're an atheist, when you go on to hold incredibly delusional beliefs elsewhere.

If you arrive to the right conclusion with the wrong methods, you're still wrong.

---
ItsyRealm, a quirky 2D/3D RPG where you fight, skill, and explore in a medieval world with horrors unimaginable.
they / she

Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
avatar

video

The longer liberals bury their head in the sand, the more likely a hardcore right-wing movement will take over--and then we'll be even more screwed.

To invoke Godwin's law, the Nazi party of World War 2 never would have happened if the world powers didn't oppress and cripple Germans into voting for ultra-right wing fascists. We're already seeing plenty of nationalist right-wing (read: reactionary) parties gaining power throughout Europe. And liberals are literally feeding them with their inaction over people's real, sincere problems.

The success of Donald Trump is definitely related to countering what people see as a useless political correctness movement. So if people really wanted to stop Trump, maybe they should start listening to the needs of the people who are willing to vote for him instead of ignoring them under the convenient banner of "xenophobia."

People are dying and they shouldn't be. I shouldn't even have to say that. And sitting back and saying, "there's nothing we can do" is absolute BS. Praying is BS. Banners and hashtags are BS. Peace rallies are BS. Action and change is what is needed.

Listen to experts. Fund the experts. Fund specialists who know how to stop or kill, terrorists.

This whole "We just need to reach them" is BS. We've ALWAYS had poverty. We've ALWAYS had people screwed by the system. We've had the internet for how many years? Why NOW are people blowing themselves up and killing innocent people so much more often?

{"name":"2E81B6E900000578-0-This_table_documenting_the_increase_in_terror_attacks_in_recent_-a-67_1447700133462.jpg","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/7\/c\/7c494bef4fb583b8f65727cf573c6c36.jpg","w":634,"h":406,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/7\/c\/7c494bef4fb583b8f65727cf573c6c36"}2E81B6E900000578-0-This_table_documenting_the_increase_in_terror_attacks_in_recent_-a-67_1447700133462.jpg

I'm so sick of people running this false dichotomy that says we can either "have our freedom and let them bomb us forever" OR, "we can throw ALL our rights away and stop the terrorists." There are solutions out there that don't turn us into cattle while we wait for our next flight. There are solutions out there that don't involve feeling up children in wheelchairs.

The issue is that things have to change. And for things to change, people have to start admitting that some of their current ideas are wrong. Our world needs to start adapting instead of acting so indignant and self-righteous about how (conveniently) the "other" political party is to blame for all the world's problems.

Lastly,

{"name":"VXEDVxy.png","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/7\/a\/7a42bd159eb135e21a97acc2be27f081.png","w":361,"h":471,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/7\/a\/7a42bd159eb135e21a97acc2be27f081"}VXEDVxy.png

-----sig:
“Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.” - Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
"Political Correctness is fascism disguised as manners" --George Carlin

Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Years of thorough research have revealed that the red "x" that closes a window, really isn't red, but white on red background.

Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest.

beoran
Member #12,636
March 2011

Is the question is "Why now", then the answer is there are 2 chickens coming to roost.

The first one is of the past mass migration of people from islamic countries to Europe. Those who descend from such in Europe are doing worse than their parents and grandparents, not better, which creates a fertile soil for extremist us against them beliefs. The second is Saudi Arabia. Almost since the beginning of the oil crisis they have been funding and prostelyzing their extreme version of islam, and now, it is making inroads with islamic immigrant population. (See here of more details: https://www.quora.com/Does-Saudi-Arabia-fund-terrorism)

If it is true what they say about the guy, then actually he may have been a hired hitman paid with the money we send them for the oil. This suggests that switching to Thorium nuclear reactors (or other alternatives) and banning Saudi oil, would be a step in indirectly defunding the ones who are prostelyzing extremist islam.

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

You don't hire a hitman to kill himself. That doesn't make any sense. The whole point of a hitman is invisibility. They do the hit and they leave with insufficient evidence to track it back to them. If you can track it back to them and punish them, with prison or death, then it isn't an equitable trade. I'm not saying he wasn't put up to it by others. I don't know. It just wouldn't make any fucking sense if they paid him because obviously he can't spend it.

If you're a Liberal you're a fucking idiot. If you're a Conservative you're a fucking idiot. If you're any other political party affiliation you're an idiot. I am a general supporter of Elizabeth May of the Green Party of Canada, and by extension the work that they do. In fact, I think technically I'm a member of the GPC. But I don't define myself that. I hold myself free to disagree with their ideas, and since they're strongly influenced by Feminism I do disagree with several of their ideas.

It makes me sick when I hear Americans throw around "left" and "right" as if everybody on either side is good or bad. It's an equal mixture of intelligence and fucking idiots. None of it matters because the actual power is controlled from above the oval office. That's why nothing really changed when Obama took office. It doesn't really matter.

It's a magic act. They steer your attention to the prop so that you don't notice the slide of hand. In terms of politics I don't think there's a good way to vote in the USA. You need to reform your political system. You need to just face that the entire system doesn't work for the people by design and needs to be rethought in a democratic way with heavy influence from unbiased academics.

Listen to experts. Fund the experts. Fund specialists who know how to stop or kill, terrorists.

You can kill them by the millions. Every terrorist you kill spawns 5 more. Killing isn't the way to stop terrorism. Killing is how it got lit and how it is fueled. Killing is itself terrorism. Supporting the idea that we can solve the problem with killing will fuel more terrorism.

Arguably the US forces are essentially terrorists in this day and age. Footage of them operating in combat in the Middle East is disgusting. It's hard to call it anything other than terrorism. So it's not about killing the terrorists. It's about being the better terrorists. Which is sickening.

The solution is again reaching out to your neighbor and inviting them in. Showing them that there's no need for violence. We can all just live happily. It also means shunning stupid ideas, whether they're foreign or domestic. Stupid ideas are stupid no matter who thought of them.

LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
avatar

bamccaig said:

You said abnormal. I said crazy.

You also said it's not ordinary. Not ordinary == abnormal.

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

bamccaig said:

One day a guy is living on cloud 9 and the next it's just, "FUCK THIS, FUCK YOU, DIEEEEEEEE"?

I said that's not ordinary. And it isn't.

Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
avatar

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/21/europe/nice-france-attacker-plot-accomplices/

So much for liberal's go-to "lone wolf theory."

Which means, lo-and-behold, there WAS something that could have been done.

-----sig:
“Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.” - Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
"Political Correctness is fascism disguised as manners" --George Carlin

GullRaDriel
Member #3,861
September 2003
avatar

Chris, there is always something that could have been done. But there is one thing with things that could have been done: they didn't. That's why in every situation, be it good or evil, there is always something that could have been done.

While I agree with you that something have to be done, I don't think of killing as the best option. But you know, things that have to be done tends to stay as garbage until it's started, and done.

Am I clear enough ?

;)

"Code is like shit - it only smells if it is not yours"
Allegro Wiki, full of examples and articles !!

Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
avatar

I don't think of killing as the best option.

I'm not necessarily saying we should kill anyone. But just going about our lives while we get slaughtered isn't changing anything.

We should be shutting down over governments with protests until they actually bother to save us.

If politician's children were the ones being killed, they sure as hell wouldn't be so cavalier about terrorism.

So to be clear, I'm not being unsympathetic to your plight. It's quite the opposite. I'm showing my concern by trying to prevent it from happening again and taking more innocent lives.

[edit] Here we go again. :'(

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36892785?ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbc_breaking&ns_source=twitter&ns_linkname=news_central

As well as Germany, where they told us it was probably a "gas leak"... until it wasn't.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/82440312/explosion-reported-in-german-city-of-ansbach

-----sig:
“Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.” - Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
"Political Correctness is fascism disguised as manners" --George Carlin

Polybios
Member #12,293
October 2010

I wish I could share your belief in the expert who just needs a microphone...

Erin Maus
Member #7,537
July 2006
avatar

We should be shutting down over governments with protests until they actually bother to save us.

Are you going to?

---
ItsyRealm, a quirky 2D/3D RPG where you fight, skill, and explore in a medieval world with horrors unimaginable.
they / she

Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
avatar

 1   2 


Go to: