|
|
|
This thread is locked; no one can reply to it.
|
| [TINS2016] announcing the winners! |
|
amarillion
Member #940
January 2001
 |
The polls are closed, the votes are in. I'm not talking about Brexit but about TINS... Of course you want to play the games! But - you can't decide which one? Have a look at the reviews! Thanks for participating, and hopefully see you again next time! -- |
|
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
 |
How are the scores calculated? For example, on Technical I got [5, 5, 4, 4] but my score is 3.75? -- |
|
MiquelFire
Member #3,110
January 2003
 |
I'll assume non review votes were lower. --- |
|
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
|
For Artistic SiegeLord has [5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 5] = 4.5714 -- |
|
MiquelFire
Member #3,110
January 2003
|
The site only shows the votes that are tied to a review. People who only voted without writing a review, their votes don't show publicly (near as I can tell). And I know because my vote for your game doesn't show up, and for all we know, there's a total of 9 votes for your game. --- |
|
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
|
eeeeeeoookkk. That makes sense. There must be a correlation between written reviews giving higher scores and non-written reviews giving lower scores. -- |
|
MiquelFire
Member #3,110
January 2003
|
I remember on the mailing list, someone reported having a public review of all 1's --- |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
That was me -- |
|
amarillion
Member #940
January 2001
|
You got the right conclusion already - the averages are calculated from all votes, but what you see below reviews is only the votes that belong with that review. For example, Mark, your tech scores were: 5,5,4,3,2,4,2,5 with an average of 3.75. It could be true that there is a slight bias between reviewed and non-reviewed games. This shouldn't make a huge difference though, because I'm making sure that each game is reviewed a minimum number of times, so the bias should be spread out evenly. Bruce, MiquelFire - Indeed I adjusted that one review that had all 1's (I just removed it from the calculation). I think it was not right to give out 1's just because you couldn't play it, especially since nobody else was reporting similar problems. As far as I can tell this was just an isolated incident, and hopefully this resolution is satisfactory to all involved. -- |
|
Niunio
Member #1,975
March 2002
 |
Bruce, MiquelFire, amarillion - Was my fault ----------------- |
|
Bruce Perry
Member #270
April 2000
|
It's all right - as I said, I consider it accidental -- |
|
GullRaDriel
Member #3,861
September 2003
 |
Thanks for the hard work. At least I finished. "Code is like shit - it only smells if it is not yours" |
|
|
Everybody's scores seem to be lower than the sum/avg of public ones.
. I'm satisfied with the resolution, my punctuation was actually not fair.
