Allegro.cc - Online Community

Allegro.cc Forums » Off-Topic Ordeals » No Greater Joy

This thread is locked; no one can reply to it. rss feed Print
 1   2   3 
No Greater Joy
Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
avatar

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clicker_training

I hear it works on humans just as well as dogs.

Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
avatar

An "attaboy" (or attagirl, as appropriate) should suffice. >:(

They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas.

Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
avatar

Positive reinforcement does tend to work rather well. But not always, or in all situations.

--
Thomas Fjellstrom - [website] - [email] - [Allegro Wiki] - [Allegro TODO]
"If you can't think of a better solution, don't try to make a better solution." -- weapon_S
"The less evidence we have for what we believe is certain, the more violently we defend beliefs against those who don't agree" -- https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/592870205409353730

Steve Terry
Member #1,989
March 2002
avatar

Something like, Mia if you stop screaming at the top of your lungs and bouncing on the bed we may take you to Chuck-e-cheeses later.... So she can bounce and scream.... ::)

___________________________________
[ Facebook ]
Microsoft is not the Borg collective. The Borg collective has got proper networking. - planetspace.de
Bill Gates is in fact Shawn Hargreaves' ßî+çh. - Gideon Weems

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

Positive re-enforcement refers to rewarding good behavior when they're good (and should not be a treat, but just praise). It is not about bribing them to be good when they're being bad. That just encourages them to be bad so that they can get rewarded for stopping. A dog could play that game. ::)

I got a 4 year old and the 2.5 year old disciplines don't work anymore :( What do I do :'(

Open hand to the buttocks. >:( (The smiley is for lulz... You should not be expressing your anger or frustration when you do it. Aim for calm-assertive,...)

Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
avatar

Something like, Mia if you stop screaming at the top of your lungs and bouncing on the bed we may take you to Chuck-e-cheeses later....

Heh. I wouldn't imagine using it for negative behaviour. More like when the child is doing good, reward it (even if most of the time its just positive verbal reinforcement).

--
Thomas Fjellstrom - [website] - [email] - [Allegro Wiki] - [Allegro TODO]
"If you can't think of a better solution, don't try to make a better solution." -- weapon_S
"The less evidence we have for what we believe is certain, the more violently we defend beliefs against those who don't agree" -- https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/592870205409353730

weapon_S
Member #7,859
October 2006
avatar

Haven't read the whole thread yet.
On-topic: Who the hell can think that book does any good? It seems to be literally just a collection of the most sadistic behaviour a parent can have.
Off-topic: I've always believed any physical punishment for kids is bad, until recently. I think such punishment does "humble", as the authors of that gruesome book rightfully put it. I now think it should be used in cases the child argues and thinks (s)he's right, but is grossly wrong. It should never be done out of anger or a deluded sense of justice.
BTW I'm pretty sure 100 years ago wasn't any better :p You're romanticizing.

Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
avatar

weapon_S said:

Off-topic: I've always believed any physical punishment for kids is bad, until recently. I think such punishment does "humble", as the authors of that gruesome book rightfully put it. I now think it should be used in cases the child argues and thinks (s)he's right, but is grossly wrong. It should never be done out of anger or a deluded sense of justice.

I dunno about using it in the case of arguments. For me to ever use it I'd have to be an exceptional circumstance. I really don't like using violence, but I can't categorically rule it out.

--
Thomas Fjellstrom - [website] - [email] - [Allegro Wiki] - [Allegro TODO]
"If you can't think of a better solution, don't try to make a better solution." -- weapon_S
"The less evidence we have for what we believe is certain, the more violently we defend beliefs against those who don't agree" -- https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/592870205409353730

weapon_S
Member #7,859
October 2006
avatar

Hm, arguments wasn't really what I meant. I always picture talking first, so there would be an argument. It's things they just couldn't understand. There's actually a Dutch saying in that regard: "He who doesn't want to listen, has to feel it".

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

Spanking isn't "violence" by definition. It is discipline. Just because there is physical force does not mean it is violence. They are distinct concepts. Lumping it in with violence is a good way for people to side against it without even understanding it just by associating it with violence, since we understand that violence is always bad (which isn't the same as unjust or unnecessary, but generally still undesirable).

I don't think that it will really work to pick and choose when you spank. You either spank or you don't. Picking and choosing would likely just confuse the child and ultimately be unfair. There's no harm in spanking properly. Do not think of it as extreme. It's not.

I wonder if teenagers would even need to be disciplined if it wasn't for their hormones making bad or risky behavior seem worth it. :D They are generally otherwise old enough to understand and appreciate what's wrong with their actions. Spanking isn't really appropriate when they reach that age. They're old enough to negotiate with, but naive, and sometimes susceptible to their hormones. All you can really do is try to limit their ability to fuck up their life. :D It's mostly just about riding out the storm.

LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
avatar

bamccaig said:

Spanking isn't "violence" by definition. It is discipline. Just because there is physical force does not mean it is violence. They are distinct concepts. Lumping it in with violence is a good way for people to side against it without even understanding it just by associating it with violence, since we understand that violence is always bad (which isn't the same as unjust or unnecessary, but generally still undesirable).

Trying to play around with definitions is pointless. People who are going to abuse their children don't care what the term for it is.

Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
avatar

The only way to get a child to stop being whiny and violent is to ignore it.
Teach them that such behaviour doesn't get them any response or attention, only then will they find other ways to get what they want.

No one can stand being bored, and there is nothing more boring than trying to get a response out of someone and be completely ignored.

The common advice on the internet is to not feed the trolls. We know that every response to a troll gives them more energy. The same thing goes for children.

Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
avatar

But if you don't feed your children they will die. :-/

furinkan
Member #10,271
October 2008
avatar

If only not feeding trolls killed them... It merely weakens them and makes them go dormant. :-/

Like I said: to spank or not to spank, that is the discussion, and it still continues.

I think we can all agree that smacking your infant on the legs to get them to stop crying is a bad idea. "No Greater Joy Ministries" has 5000 likes on FB. Some people are so gullible you can piss in their mouth and tell them its lemonade.

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

Trezker said:

The only way to get a child to stop being whiny and violent is to ignore it.
Teach them that such behaviour doesn't get them any response or attention, only then will they find other ways to get what they want.

No one can stand being bored, and there is nothing more boring than trying to get a response out of someone and be completely ignored.

Except they will get a response from everybody that isn't able to ignore them (i.e., everybody that isn't their parents). Your child has no right to be an asshole just because he's a child. It's your job to correct them. Not ignore them. You better either be in control of them or keep them contained within your home.

A quick spank (or if they've been spanked before, just a threat) would put a stop to it and let everybody else go on with their day in peace. Though you probably wouldn't even need to say anything if your child has been spanked before because they wouldn't be obnoxious enough to think they would get away with that. Instead, parents these days just sit there like, "Gee, golly, what can I do if he doesn't want to be quiet...? :-["

LET ME SHOW YOU. >:(

I was embarrassed once or twice from getting spanked in public for being an obnoxious brat (i.e., think like 5 years old). After that, I was embarrassed a few more times getting threatened to get a spank in public for being an obnoxious brat (i.e., think like 8). After that the threat of a spank wasn't even necessary because I just knew not to be an obnoxious brat[, especially not in public].

Well a spanking can be quite a disruptive thing too. There's the loud slapping sound, followed by all of the crying. Everybody around is left trying to judge whether it is abuse or discipline (and in our overly sensitive modern society, large numbers of people would wrongly condemn it as abuse, even if it is discipline). If you can it's probably best to take it into the privacy of your home, or at least the parking lot first, or whatever. That said, if you can't easily leave, and the child refuses to obey, then I think that spanking in public is acceptable.

Trezker said:

The common advice on the internet is to not feed the trolls. We know that every response to a troll gives them more energy.

You're failing to realize that trolls are an Internet phenomenon that typically doesn't apply to the real world. An asshole in the real world will probably get punched in the face sooner or later. Not every response to a troll gives them energy.

Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
avatar

The key is to not react to their trolling.
Only react to good stuff.

If you keep punishing your children for doing things wrong, they will only become afraid of telling you when they mess up. They wont come to you for help when they're in trouble, which means they can get really deep into heavy drugs for example as they don't dare seek help.

The only thing violence teaches children is how to hide things from their parents.

Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
avatar

What about sticking things into the electrical outlets, playing in the street, or even beating up the neighbor kids?

They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas.

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

Trezker said:

If you keep punishing your children for doing things wrong, they will only become afraid of telling you when they mess up. They wont come to you for help when they're in trouble, which means they can get really deep into heavy drugs for example as they don't dare seek help.

It's important to explain to your children why they're getting punished and that you love them anyway. You most certainly can make an effort to explain to them that they can come to you first about stuff and if they do come to you first then you should certainly take that into account and maybe go easy on them. You do have to watch out for them to try to exploit that though too.. It's important that they don't get away with it if they come forward. They should still be punished. It just might be a lighter sentence for them being honest and coming to you for help. In any case, punishing them for their mistakes will not make them afraid to come to you if you talk openly with them. It's a different part of you entirely. Children that are spanked are not afraid of their parents 24/7. Only when they feel guilty for something. ;)

Of course, I believe that a child that is spanked will probably be more afraid of trying something like drugs. Drugs are a very serious thing, and it's up to parents to tell the kids that. The kids that know the severity (at least in their parents' eyes) and are spanked can only imagine how much it's going to hurt if they are caught. At least, at a young age like 8 or 10 where a lot of kids seem to be getting into it now. It's sort of early for a heart-to-heart at that age. They can't possibly understand. They should just be too afraid to even try it.

As a matter of fact, I was surprised to find out that my high school love interest apparently tried smoking when she was only about 12 and even encouraged her even younger cousin to try. And she was a "goody-two-shoes" Christian girl... I would have never dreamed of it. I was afraid to go anywhere near a cigarette, even in high school, let alone elementary school!

There are some things that kids just won't talk to their parents about easily. They'd be ashamed to. You know your parents are going to be disappointed and rightly so. IMO, it's better that the kid is afraid of screwing up than for them to be unafraid of screwing up and unafraid of telling you about it after. Some of the things that they could screw up (especially these days it seems) might leave them too dead to come to you about after.

By the time children are in high school the spankings should have stopped. So it's a non-issue at that point. They are effectively approaching "young adulthood" where they have to start making their own choices and being responsible for them. Still though, I think that a teenager that was spanked growing up will be more afraid of getting caught than one that wasn't.

My parents were pretty much there for us. I was still afraid of them catching me doing something wrong, but at the same time they did make the effort to let us come to them with things and other than them being awkward about relationship stuff I did feel pretty good about talking to them about most stuff (as with most kids, I was most comfortable talking to my mom because she was softer... I think that a broken home leaves the parents unbalanced in that sense and unable to really be there for the kids as a team in the ways that they should).

My brother started smoking in high school. He got caught a few times too. Didn't get spanked or anything. He was too old. My parents treated him like a young adult. They tried to openly talk sense into him, grounded him, etc. Didn't really matter. There was no stopping him. His friends smoked. You really can't do much about that. A person is either able to stand alone or succumbs to the peer pressure.

To this day he is a slave to cigarettes. He has tried to quit 3 or 4 times now, even with some success, but eventually succumbs to it again. I don't think there was anything else that my parents could have done. He made his own choices, and he was never known for making good ones. Some people use their heads, and some people can't seem to when it counts. I know that growing up he was afraid of getting caught by my parents though. I witnessed fear of the repercussions help to keep him out of serious trouble on many occasions.

Trezker said:

The only thing violence teaches children is how to hide things from their parents.

Any kind of discipline (that matters) will train a child to try to hide things from their parents. If they aren't trying to hide it then they obviously aren't afraid of the punishment. That doesn't stop them from doing it. They're just not afraid of getting caught doing it. Arguably this might help you to spot really extreme shit more easily, but at the expense of failing to teach them any values and letting them be an asshole their whole life, as well as letting them do a bunch of stuff that you shouldn't. Also, if you never punish them then what are you going to do to stop them when you do catch them with something serious? By the time they're 12 or 14 if they're not afraid of the consequences yet then it's too late. You won't be able to control them. Period. If you try they'll just run away. They'd have been taught their whole life that their decisions don't have any real consequences. You can't just suddenly start in with consequences that late in their development.

 1   2   3 


Go to: