I honestly have no idea what your point is.
There's no need to justify claims we both agree on.
We are discussing your claim that I shouldn't have offered solution X to problem Y because it counts as advocating a bad programming practice to a beginner. It's entirely up to you to prove this claim and that won't happen until you offer a proof that I can't refute. I have refuted your proofs and you have neither addressed my arguments nor offered any new proof, therefore your claim is so far unjustified.

Sometimes you know better than doing something but go ahead and do it anyway. I have a weakness when it comes to unsettled arguments.
All I'm saying is that you're not faring too well so far (showing ignorance of the basic principles of debate), so you should save yourself further embarrassment and save me this waste of time and quit it. I am going to mercilessly destroy any proof you offer untill you give up.

[EDIT]

Look, basically, you lose this one automatically.
What counts as a "proper" solution to a problem depends on the context.
Whether it is acceptable or not to show a beginner a sub-optimal solution also depends on the context.
Whether or not my post gives the misleading impression that the offered solution is THE proper way to load levels is a matter of opinion at best.
The guy is gone, the context isn't clear, whether my statement has served to mislead him isn't clear, so you technically can't prove what you need to prove to win. Go away.

@GibbSticks: Yeah, I'm sure your post serves much purpose in this thread. I really don't think he cares much for this thread. His questions had been answered long ago. You're just feeling left out of the fun. Come on, join in. We can debate whether it's acceptable or not to recycle this thread for a debate.

Lose the argument.
It doesn't matter if you care or not. Just stating a fact.
What does Thomas have to do with anything?
What makes you think I was angry at him?
I simply pointed out that he's clearly in no position to make his remarks if we consider the contents of his own posts.

That's the problem. I thought we were having a discussion but all you do is spew nosense without making any valid points. I thought you just don't have the mental capacity to realize that. Turns out you're just not trying? What is the point of your incoherent babbling then, if it doesn't serve to validate your original claim?

Maybe you should take a look at yourself and see if you can figure out why it's important for you to keep up your irrelevant rethoric when you know how pointless it is. Why is it so important for you that the last word be yours, even if your last word is a load of nonsense?

I don't take things personally and it's not important for me to make you see that I'm right. I just don't like to leave things hanging. Seeing as you have no more valid arguments and resort to silly ad-hominem attacks, this discussion is closed.

It's not different than normal for me. It's what I sound like without that thin veil of politeness. It's not my nature, to be polite. It's a burden and I see no reason to keep it up when dealing with obvious trolls.

I don't like to leave things hanging. Call that an emotional reason if you like.

With an IQ like yours, you should be looking for a cure to cancer. Too bad you waste your brilliance trying too hard to sound smart on the internet.

Well, it's nice that you felt that way, but that's in your head. In the real world, it remains completely arbitrary untill you offer a proof that I can't counter with a valid argument. If you don't care to do that, that's perfectly fine. That discussion is closed and your criticism remains arbitrary.

Herp derp. There you go again, babbling nonsense, trying to be a smartass. Good job.

That didn't make any sense.

Wow, you're actually right this time. Since you weren't even trying to say anything relevant or have an actual discussion, your nonsense about me having a "hissy fit" and being too concerned with proving myself to random internet people can't even be considered ad hominem.