Allegro.cc - Online Community

Allegro.cc Forums » Off-Topic Ordeals » airsoft guns

This thread is locked; no one can reply to it. rss feed Print
 1   2 
airsoft guns
alethiophile
Member #9,349
December 2007
avatar

verthex said:

On a side note, Americans are savage animals, your reasoning for killing someone does not apply to a coyote.

Even leaving aside the gratuitous and offensive slur against all 300 million US citizens, what the heck are you talking about?

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
C++: An octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog.
I am the Lightning-Struck Penguin of Doom.

verthex
Member #11,340
September 2009
avatar

Even leaving aside the gratuitous and offensive slur against all 300 million US citizens, what the heck are you talking about?

Only the gun toting ones, not all 300 million, obviously you don't get out much. But do realize that the support for invading a foreign country on BS was supported by about 70% of the US. That says something about America. ;)

Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
avatar

Guns don't kill people. Lead moving at high velocities does. :P

bamccaig said:

I don't get the impression from any of A.cc's American members that they're afraid of walking down the street, but if they are I don't think gun laws would change it.

I'm not afraid to walk down the street. And I'm not talking about just rural Kentucky, I grew up just north of Chicago and I never worried about walking down the street, even at night.

Guns don't necessarily lead to gun violence. I cite Switzerland as evidence for my case. Gun Politics in Switzerland

LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
avatar

verthex said:

Only the gun toting ones, not all 300 million, obviously you don't get out much.

Why are you insulting Alethiophile when it was your poorly worded sentence that was at fault? Obviously you didn't get much of an education.

Your reply also still doesn't explain why you brought up coyotes.

Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
avatar

LennyLen said:

Your reply also still doesn't explain why you brought up coyotes.

Because coyotes are the model of the perfect society. All hail the great coyote! Let us all roll in dirt, sniff each other's butts, and eat raw meat that has been dead for a week. And it will be good.

:-/

blargmob
Member #8,356
February 2007
avatar

verthex said:

But do realize that the support for invading a foreign country on BS was supported by about 70% of the US. That says something about America.

Asshole.

Had they had WMD's that they were planning to use, we would have had a big fat problem on our hands. But no, we took a perfectly justifiable precautionary. Better safe then sorry. And stop acting like you know everything about everything. Because you don't. >:(

---
"No amount of prayer would have produced the computers you use to spread your nonsense." Arthur Kalliokoski

Timorg
Member #2,028
March 2002

blargmob said:

Had they had WMD's that they were planning to use, we would have had a big fat problem on our hands. But no, we took a perfectly justifiable precautionary. Better safe then sorry. And stop acting like you know everything about everything. Because you don't. >:(

So America has WMD, if Iraq (or any other country for that matter,) had of decided that there was a risk of America using them to attack their troops or soil, would they have had the rights to take a 'precautionary' and attack America?

That is a blade that cuts both ways.

____________________________________________________________________________________________
"c is much better than c++ if you don't need OOP simply because it's smaller and requires less load time." - alethiophile
OMG my sides are hurting from laughing so hard... :D

blargmob
Member #8,356
February 2007
avatar

Timorg said:

So America has WMD, if Iraq (or any other country for that matter,) had of decided that there was a risk of America using them to attack their troops or soil, would they have had the rights to take a 'precautionary' and attack America?

WMD's in Iraq a far less secure and easier to fall into terrorist hands (by theft, purchase, etc.). However, in America, this is not the case. WMD's are much more secure and wayyyy less likely to fall into the hands of some extremist group.

---
"No amount of prayer would have produced the computers you use to spread your nonsense." Arthur Kalliokoski

Timorg
Member #2,028
March 2002

That is true. But it doesn't invalidate that your argument is flawed. But take America out of it. India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons, is it ok for them to attack each other, because one of them may use a nuke on the other?

____________________________________________________________________________________________
"c is much better than c++ if you don't need OOP simply because it's smaller and requires less load time." - alethiophile
OMG my sides are hurting from laughing so hard... :D

 1   2 


Go to: