|
|
| Forgot my password difficult / non-obvious to access (suggestion) |
|
emilb
Member #7,146
April 2006
|
I log in quite seldom to allegro.cc and it's not one of the websites for which I do remember my password for any long time. Unlike almost every forum I've seen, on the first log in page there's no "forgot my password" link. Maybe there's a good reason for this. I wouldn't know. Anyway, I suggest adding just that, so that me (and others) can more easily retrieve the password whenever it disappears. Feels like a basic function that should just be there. I've learnt to work around it on allegro.cc, by clicking "create new account" I can get to another page which has a link such as "Do not create multiple accounts, click here if you forgot your pw", other times by using google I've been able to "allegro.cc forgot password", and such, but like I said, it's not obvious and it's not like 90% of web pages and forums I've ever seen in my life, for no apparent reason. The first few times I really got stuck and took a good while to find the link for retrieving the pw. It was there, it was just hard to find. I don't have a problem with this anymore. Still I find it's worth suggesting. People will have the same problem as I did. |
|
Neil Walker
Member #210
April 2000
|
https://www.allegro.cc/account/join - there is an email to support. Matthew will get back to you within 3 months However, invest in a password manager, like PasswordSafe. If you use firefox then get sxipper as well for double back up and password remembering. That way, you'll never forget. Neil. wii:0356-1384-6687-2022, kart:3308-4806-6002. XBOX:chucklepie |
|
Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
|
Neil Walker said: However, invest in a password manager, like PasswordSafe. If you use firefox then get sxipper as well for double back up and password remembering. I'm too paranoid to keep my passwords saved anywhere but in my memory.
|
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
|
I keep my passwords on a piece of paper near the computer, and the characters still have to be remapped on the keyboard (one row up modulo) so if the paper says They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
|
Neil Walker
Member #210
April 2000
|
I'd rather trust 256 bit twofish encryption that a keyboard shift or my brain Neil. wii:0356-1384-6687-2022, kart:3308-4806-6002. XBOX:chucklepie |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
|
Neil Walker said: 256 bit twofish encryption That sounds like it requires a computer to use. If you forget your logon password to your computer, you're screwed! So you need at least one password stored some other way. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
|
Anomie
Member #9,403
January 2008
|
My passwords are usually absurdly long (as long as the password field will accept) number sequences that are easy to remember or recreate, which are then obfuscated somehow. For instance, 147221134175226134020105168421 (hailstone sequence starting at 14) gets shift held down and becomes !$&@@!!#$!&%@@^!#$)@)!)%!^*$@!. ______________ |
|
CGamesPlay
Member #2,559
July 2002
|
Is the service important? Then I use a long, random password. Will I ever need to access the service while away from my desktop and laptop? If not, I use a long, random password. Otherwise, my password is one of 3 separate ones that I've used for the past decade. I can't access my email when I am away from my computer, but since my email account would give someone access to my bank accounts, social networking, and literally everything else, I'm willing to live without it. I also keep a copy of portaPuTTY on my phone, so if I have that I can SSH to my server and get my passwords from that. -- Ryan Patterson - <http://cgamesplay.com/> |
|
weapon_S
Member #7,859
October 2006
|
With this thread in the back of my head, I went into a state between silently quivering in a corner and laughing out loud ,when I encountered this hellish mix of user inconvenience and lack of safety today: (translated) Your password must adhere to the following:
My suspicion was confirmed, that the password can only contain alphanumerics. And on the last rule should be noted, that the user name is a random sequence of digits... possibly ruling out a lot of digit sequences, for... "security". |
|
Jonatan Hedborg
Member #4,886
July 2004
|
Meh. Almost all password hacks are due to keylogging anyway, not brute force. I have 4 different passwords of increasing complexity that I use almost everywhere. I use clipperz to store anything very vital or that deviates from my regular passwords for some reason (like having absurd rules about passwords used).
|
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
weapon_S: I raise you my incompetent bank's "improved" password policy from earlier this year. The password must
Yes, really. -- |
|
Neil Walker
Member #210
April 2000
|
Jonatan Hedborg said: Meh. Almost all password hacks are due to keylogging anyway A few random thoughts on the matter. 1. I use KeyScramber which means any keyloggers are (hopefully) doomed to failure Neil. wii:0356-1384-6687-2022, kart:3308-4806-6002. XBOX:chucklepie |
|
MiquelFire
Member #3,110
January 2003
|
Neil Walker said: 2. I can vaguely remember reading a blog by one of the chief google engineers saying password fields (using *) are pointless and should be made normal by default. Which actually makes sense to me. What? Password Fields prevent over the shoulder password stealing. --- |
|
CGamesPlay
Member #2,559
July 2002
|
Neil Walker said: 1. I use KeyScramber which means any keyloggers are (hopefully) doomed to failure Right, because encrypting your keystrokes and then immediately decrypting them certainly prevents them from being logged Quote: 2. I can vaguely remember reading a blog by one of the chief google engineers saying password fields (using *) are pointless and should be made normal by default. Which actually makes sense to me. I agree here. Was this the article? -- Ryan Patterson - <http://cgamesplay.com/> |
|
weapon_S
Member #7,859
October 2006
|
Jonatan Hedborg said: Almost all password hacks are due to keylogging anyway, not brute force. My analytical skills suck, but I've always thought that adding rules to your password made it easier to brute force crack... |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
That depends on how you mean. If people had actually been smart enough to choose strong passwords by themselves, password rules would only make them easier to crack. Unfortunately, unless you stop them, people will choose easily guessable, all lowercase letter passwords (besides classics like "qwerty123" or, for people who think they are clever, "name$YEAROFBIRTH"). But there are still no excuses whatsoever for the Daily WTF-worthy "two digits" rule my bank implemented. -- |
|
Evert
Member #794
November 2000
|
gnolam said: Only consist of letters and numbers I hate that. I like putting in random (to other people) non-letter and non-number characters... I always feel as though I have to "dumb down" my passwords due to rules like that. |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
|
It occurred to me to check my email (gmail) last night, and I couldn't access gmail, Google account or YouTube account even with the passwords I had plainly written on pieces of paper in front of me. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
|
Neil Black
Member #7,867
October 2006
|
I like the little "password strength" meter some sites give you. It's funny what they consider a strong password. I've typed in an all-lowercase common english word and a single digit and gotten a strong rating. So, what do you all consider a strong password?
|
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Neil Black said: So, what do you all consider a strong password? rf34f7jwea16q is pretty good.
|
|
CGamesPlay
Member #2,559
July 2002
|
MySpace at some point added a policy such that you can't set your password to "password". I guess that was a common problem. Fortunately, I set my MySpace password before that limitation -- Ryan Patterson - <http://cgamesplay.com/> |
|
MiquelFire
Member #3,110
January 2003
|
x98LhEpf;v)Y That would be a password I would use (assuming the site is not imposing any limits on what character I can and can't use, or require certain types of characters to appear as one class they check for may not appear) --- |
|
|