|
|
|
This thread is locked; no one can reply to it.
|
1
2
|
| Going C++ |
|
Kibiz0r
Member #6,203
September 2005
 |
Tobias Dammers said: In some cases, you go from C to C++ to C#, and then you get VB all over your face. lolol VB I'm thinking some mixture of C# and Ruby would be optimal, but I'm not sure what the proper ratio should be, or where to make the break. I suppose for a level-based game, Ruby would be ideal for scripting the level while C# handles the number-crunching. --- |
|
Thomas Harte
Member #33
April 2000
 |
Kibiz0r said: Ruby would be ideal for scripting the level Shush! Around here the consensus is that 'scripting' and 'LUA' are synonyms. (don't tell anyone, but I script in ECMAScript) [My site] [Tetrominoes] |
|
Kibiz0r
Member #6,203
September 2005
|
Thomas Harte said: (don't tell anyone, but I script in ECMAScript) I'm sorry to hear that. --- |
|
Ron Novy
Member #6,982
March 2006
 |
OK... Since nobody else made the connection, I guess I will... Steve Terry said: Once you go C++ you never go back .... she's such a whore
Tobias Dammers said: In some cases, you go from C to C++ to C#, and then you get VB all over your face.
I guess you meant VD right? Or are those interchangeable these days ---- |
|
Schyfis
Member #9,752
May 2008
 |
Tobias Dammers said: In some cases, you go from C to C++ to C#, and then you get VB all over your face. Eeeeeeew. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
 |
VB == VD? They both have something to do with viruses, right? They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
|
Thomas Harte
Member #33
April 2000
|
Kibiz0r said: I'm sorry to hear that. It's right there in the OS, and 'good enough'. [My site] [Tetrominoes] |
|
|
1
2
|
