![]() |
|
Who do you want as the next President of the USA? |
le_y_mistar
Member #8,251
January 2007
![]() |
Conclusion: study something worthwhile so that you won't have to do minimum wage. In canada minimum wage is about 10$/hour so that's 10*7.5*5*4=1500$ and considering that our dollar is higher than american, 7.75$/hour at minimum wage is a complete rip off ----------------- |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
I got myself so upset writing my last post I forgot why I was originally going to post. Getting a better than minumum wage job (or working for yourself, doing the things your former bosses hired you for) is all well and good for making money, you're reasonably skilled, and no boss to answer to etc. BUT, you then have to have social skills that allow effective negotiation, so you can charge what you're worth. I used to be a mechanic, I was taking on the occasional odd job for the last few months, but the "customers" are all penny pinching idiots who want something for nothing. They ask "Why can't you do this or that?" and I tell them, they don't believe me, they want to get by on junkyard parts that aren't even for their car (it can often be done, but with much more effort) for a fraction of the price of a shop down the road. Sure, I don't have the overhead of maintaining a large building, but less than half price for labor and IMAO better than average quality work is worth it to them. But I've been running them all off for the last three months. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
@Edgar If you truly believe in your ideas you should dedicate your income to the cause. Something tells me you do not have any rich friends and probably have never met a rich person, you have been very harsh to a group of people calling them all sorts of unjustified names. Edgar said: .. all the rich snobs aren't willing to do ..
Egar said: .. the world of the rich stands on the back of the poor .. If you believe in these causes stop trying to spend someone else's money. Use your own. Where I come from its rude to steal money... (for any cause whatsoever) |
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
![]() |
- Dustin - My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
nonnus29
Member #2,606
August 2002
![]() |
You guys need to go and read "The Fountain Head" and "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand in any particular order. And then come back here and we can discuss how Rand was no talent hack. |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
Edgar said: I pay taxes just like everyone else. Thats a lie and a half. For starters rich people pay far more than you. Additionally, they also pay a higher percentage of their income than you do. |
BAF
Member #2,981
December 2002
![]() |
Rich people hire tax professionals to get them out of 90% of their taxes. |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
I think Ayn Rand is exaggerated too far in the other direction, however I agree with her more than I do Edgar. Additionally I think her novels were just premises to exercise her sexual fantasies. |
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
![]() |
While rich folks do hire tax professionals to reduce their taxes, approximately 80% of the tax is paid by the top 25% of people. [Source: my memory.] So they still do pay a disproportionate amount of taxes. Unfortunately if there is going to be an income tax, then it has to be that way. The first $20,000 (or some amount) of your money is relatively 100% needed to survive, and then the next $60,000 (or some other amount) is needed for some standard of living, and the rest becomes more for extravagance. But I don't particularly like the idea of income tax. It's not because I'm against taxing the rich, but it doesn't seem fair because everything else you do with your money ends up getting taxed as well. |
nonnus29
Member #2,606
August 2002
![]() |
When I was poor I didn't pay any taxes: everything that was withheld from my pay check was returned at the end of the year. Since I've had a 'real' job I've been paying about $5000 a year in income tax. But if you compare the total tax we pay in the US (income + property + fica + social security + sales tax etc) we still pay a lot less than most Europeans (at least those not on the dole). What do you guys think of Oprah campaigning for Obama? Personally, I think he is too weak of a candidate to be factor against Hilary; Oprah power or not. All Hilary has to do is not screw up next year and I think she'll be the Dem nominee. |
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
![]() |
- Dustin - I don't really know how taxes worked into this into the first place , it may have even been my fault. Raising the minimum wage is not paid for through taxes. It is paid for through increased costs of basic goods and services. Everyone uses basic goods and services in some form or another. The costs of raising minimum wage would be distributed throughout the entire economy. The reason a minimum wage has to be mandated in the first place is because business owners are out to make money. They can increase their profit by either lowering their wages , raising their prices , or by increasing demand and therefore sales. My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
Edgar said: The reason a minimum wage has to be mandated in the first place is because business owners are out to make money. They can increase their profit by either lowering their wages , raising their prices , or by increasing demand and therefore sales. Once the companies can lower their costs the invisible hand will lower costs to consumers. Customers will be able to buy the same goods at lower costs. To paraphrase yourself: Edgar, modified, said: The [effects] would be distributed throughout the entire economy. Meaning we can all benefit from the effects, as opposed to your situation which makes us all suffer for the benefit of a few. I agree that there are cases where the capitalist system breaks down and the invisible hand needs to be "modified" a bit, however minimum wage is far too generic to be of any use. Matthew said: it doesn't seem fair because everything else you do with your money ends up getting taxed as well. This gives me an interesting idea. What if you taxed people based off what percentage of their income they did not spend... |
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
![]() |
Okay Dustin , so you'd like it if the minimum wage was lowered? So the people who have to work it can't afford to eat or pay rent? So "we" can all benefit from the effects of more homeless people and more desperate people? Sounds nice. My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
Well look on the bright side, now that dollar can actually buy the homeless guy something. |
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
![]() |
Except that that dollar wouldn't buy the homeless person anything more than before because when costs are lowered , the prices don't lower proportionally. It justs translates into more profit for the business owners , not the employees. My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
Quote: Except that that dollar wouldn't buy the homeless person anything more than before because when costs are lowered , the prices don't lower proportionally. It justs translates into more profit for the business owners , not the employees. And than a guy like me comes along, sees the huge price gap, and decides to start a company undercutting them (Did somebody say McDonalds?). Don't mistake something that takes time with something that doesn't happen. Also read up on the Invisible Hand, as these last two posts could have been skipped if you understood what I meant with the concept. |
Evert
Member #794
November 2000
![]() |
Poetin. |
Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
![]() |
Wikipedia's quote from The Wealth of Nations Book IV said: But the annual revenue of every society is always precisely equal to the exchangeable value of the whole annual wasteman produce of its industry, or rather is precisely the same thing with that exchangeable value. As every individual, therefore, endeavors as much as he can both to employ his capital in the support of domestic industry, and so to direct that industry that its produce may be of the greatest value; every individual necessarily labors to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was not part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good. It is an affectation, indeed, not very common among merchants, and very few words need be employed in dissuading them from it. (IV.ii.6-9, page 456 of the 1776 Glasgow Edition of Smith’s works; vol. IV, ch. 2, p. 477 of 1776 U. of Chicago Edition.) Quoting from the quote Quote: By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. By this reasoning then minimum wage workers promoting minimum wage increases are promoting the interest of society. What do you think worker's unions are for? They're there to promote the interests of the workers and to make sure they feel they are getting paid what they deserve and what is reasonable. Most minimum wage workers however have no such union with which to exert bargaining power with to secure higher wages for themselves. This is why we need someone in office who can secure it for them through a minimum wage increase , not to mention affordable health insurance. In any case , we clearly have not or cannot come to a middle ground on this and I tire of discussing this further. I've got work to do. Later. My Website! | EAGLE GUI Library Demos | My Deviant Art Gallery | Spiraloid Preview | A4 FontMaker | Skyline! (Missile Defense) Eagle and Allegro 5 binaries | Older Allegro 4 and 5 binaries | Allegro 5 compile guide |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
Cool, take it easy |
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
![]() |
No minimum wage is a bad idea for reasons I already mentioned. While capitalism is generally good and works itself out, there are some areas where greed leaves people out in the cold. A fair minimum wage makes it worthwhile to work but does not raise prices to an unfair amount. That is, maybe a fast food place could sell a cheese burger for $0.50 without any minimum wage, but it's more beneficial to society for them to pay their employees a fair amount and charge $1.00. The problem is, in a capitalistic world, we consumers would rather pay $0.50 and let people suffer through a worthless job because hey, it isn't us! Quote: This gives me an interesting idea. What if you taxed people based off what percentage of their income they did not spend... That's almost what income tax is, although the USA system is so convoluted it's hard to see it that way. The alternative to income tax (other than reducing federal programs) is to tax people on what they do spend and give poor people a monthly rebate. |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
Its tricky ground talking about these things. I think most people agree that spending money on mentally retarded individuals is worth it, however most people would agree to not give me money (solely for existing). I view it as a sliding scale, how much do you prefer to sacrifice for the individual? I think a more interesting issue is that the majority of Americans are good at the same things. We can almost all make a coffee or flip a burger. If we could give this large group of people skills to push them elsewhere, the wages for those positions would naturally rise. I tend to prefer the positive* solution to the negative* solution. Matthew said: That's almost what income tax is, although the USA system is so convoluted it's hard to see it that way. The restriction to 'business related purchases' modifies things a bit. *What I mean by terms.. positive: leave the system as-is as much as possible, injecting more quality of work to fix problems. negative: hurt the system, as in hurting the value of the dollar for some means (usually a moral stance of some sort). |
Ariesnl
Member #2,902
November 2002
![]() |
@ Matthew Leverton If people have money they will spend it... right ? So it's better for me to pay a fair amount.. because IF people have enough money they WILL be able to buy the things I make money with.. Money "standing still" looses it's value In other words...If everyone would be very minimalistic in spending money, economy would go in a crashdive Perhaps one day we will find that the human factor is more complicated than space and time (Jean luc Picard) |
ImLeftFooted
Member #3,935
October 2003
![]() |
Ariesnl said: So it's better for me to pay a fair amount.. because IF people have enough money they WILL be able to buy the things I make money with.. A more powerful effect than this one is if you stop trading value for money, the money itself loses value. To quote another author.. If we habitually broke all of our windows, we could employ a huge army of repairmen. It is foolish to think money itself can drive the economy. |
nonnus29
Member #2,606
August 2002
![]() |
The rebuttal to that is Henry Ford paying his factory workers an absurd amount of money for the times because he wanted his workers to be able to buy what they were building. The historic effect of the automanufacturers on the economy is probably significant (killing the planet with C02 death machines is another matter entirely). |
GullRaDriel
Member #3,861
September 2003
![]() |
Which one for USA next president ? Who cares , it will be a drunk or a comedian "Code is like shit - it only smells if it is not yours" |
|
|