|
|
|
This thread is locked; no one can reply to it.
|
1
2
|
| Evolution dissproved!!1one |
|
Jonatan Hedborg
Member #4,886
July 2004
 |
Is this for real? Can people be that stupid? EDIT: removed a smiley. EDIT2: Gah! It snuck up on me.
|
|
HoHo
Member #4,534
April 2004
 |
You still have a smiley there Nice little video. I wonder how difficult would it be to create something similar that would prove that creationism couldn't happen. Perhaps we could say that if someone created life once, why haven't it been created any more? [edit] Some fun stuff here too: http://www.baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/ __________ |
|
FMC
Member #4,431
March 2004
 |
My god! Actually the video does indeed show Darwin was wrong: if someone so thick as the "engineer" is still alive there has truly been no evolution... [FMC Studios] - [Caries Field] - [Ctris] - [Pman] - [Chess for allegroites] |
|
OICW
Member #4,069
November 2003
 |
Surely, you're joking mr. ... He must be kidding if he thinks that somebody will eat that crap he said. Well actually someone will, that's a shame for them... [My website][CppReference][Pixelate][Allegators worldwide][Who's online] |
|
Todd Cope
Member #998
November 2000
 |
Quote: but that creationist "evidence" is just hilarious Where is the creationist evidence in the video? I don't see any. The comments on that video's page are utterly ridiculous. The only thing stupid about the video is the misuse of terminology. Evolution and abiogenesis are not the same thing. Oh yeah, and the ant in the peanut butter, that was stupid. I will agree to laugh at this guy if he actually thinks that evolutionists believe a complex life form such as an ant would suddenly appear but I think that was just a poor choice of visuals. And no, no one will eat that crap because it has such a religious overtone to it. As soon as the video starts, oh no, time for some more creationist bullshit! Bottom line is people need to stop being so prejudice. Intelligence is not measured by whether or not someone is a creationist. |
|
Samuel Henderson
Member #3,757
August 2003
 |
That was one of the most feeble attempts at defending creationism I have seen yet. This bacon eating atheistic jew makes does make some good points. Edit: ================================================= |
|
X-G
Member #856
December 2000
 |
Quote: Intelligence is not measured by whether or not someone is a creationist. I beg to differ; and at any rate, delusion certainly is... -- |
|
le_y_mistar
Member #8,251
January 2007
 |
sometimes there really is no point taking sides when all you have are theories. For now, I accept both as valid possibilities. ----------------- |
|
X-G
Member #856
December 2000
|
Both being possible doesn't mean they have equal probability of being true. -- |
|
Dennis
Member #1,090
July 2003
 |
Hehe, that video is certainly amusing. It doesn't disprove anything at all and it's funny how that man pulls random implications out of nothing, based on some statistics: "billions of people have opened peanut butter jars and none of them found any new life in it... that proves that evolution can not happen" (ridiculously funny, because of the missing logical link between the premise and the conclusion and because that man appears so convinced about what he's talking about) --- 0xDB | @dennisbusch_de --- |
|
le_y_mistar
Member #8,251
January 2007
|
Quote: Both being possible doesn't mean they have equal probability of being true. which means that they can both be false as well. ----------------- |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
 |
le_y_mistar said: sometimes there really is no point taking sides when all you have are theories. But when one is an actual theory (in the scientific sense) and the other one isn't, there is a point to taking sides. And there's only one side to take. -- |
|
le_y_mistar
Member #8,251
January 2007
|
Quote: But when one is an actual theory (in the scientific sense) and the other one isn't, there is a point to taking sides. And there's only one side to take. Scientifically speaking, god(s) is a valid theory as well, since the existance of superior divinity cannot be approved or disapproved. ----------------- |
|
Rampage
Member #3,035
December 2002
 |
Quote: Scientifically speaking, god(s) is a valid theory as well, since the existance of superior divinity cannot be approved or disapproved. The fact that it can't be proved nor disproved makes it not a valid scientific theory. [edit] Man, was that video funny. -R |
|
FMC
Member #4,431
March 2004
|
The existence of god doesn't disprove evolutionism in any way, nor does it actually prove creationism... [FMC Studios] - [Caries Field] - [Ctris] - [Pman] - [Chess for allegroites] |
|
Kibiz0r
Member #6,203
September 2005
 |
I'm in class right now, so I didn't watch the linked video, but it sounds like a take-off on this: --- |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
 |
New organic molecules are formed all the time, but the existing life eats it before it can "evolve". They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
|
Myrdos
Member #1,772
December 2001
|
Quote: Scientifically speaking, god(s) is a valid theory as well, since the existance of superior divinity cannot be approved or disapproved. It's not a scientific theory unless it can be disproved. [EDIT] We can never 'prove' that scientific theories are correct, we can only disprove them by demonstrating that they fail to describe some physical events. __________________________________________________ |
|
FMC
Member #4,431
March 2004
|
Quote: It's not a scientific theory unless it can be disproved. Popper? [FMC Studios] - [Caries Field] - [Ctris] - [Pman] - [Chess for allegroites] |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
No thanks. I don't do those kinds of drugs. -- |
|
X-G
Member #856
December 2000
|
Most importantly, God isn't subject to empirical studies, verification, replication, falsification, or any other hallmarks of genuine science. It's just faith. -- |
|
GullRaDriel
Member #3,861
September 2003
 |
Bwah. All that is as speaking about who has been the first, the egg or the chicken... It is a complete nonsense to argue about it without have done a big research on it. "Code is like shit - it only smells if it is not yours" |
|
mEmO
Member #1,124
March 2001
 |
I think the aliens put us here. It's the only way to explain creationists. --------------------------------------------- |
|
OICW
Member #4,069
November 2003
|
Hey, you actually believe in that woodoo-bullshit? It's all just a momo-jombo, we live in virtual reality [My website][CppReference][Pixelate][Allegators worldwide][Who's online] |
|
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
Only one of us lives in a virtual reality. The rest of us are... well, virtual beings. If you don't get this, I'm afraid I have to say to you all that I'm the one not virtual. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
|
|
1
2
|
