![]() |
|
Worthy Movies |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
Just finished watching The Man From Earth, it was pretty "meh" until the fairly interesting ending. I wonder what the production budget was? They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
For the unspecified lazy ones: Budget $200,000(wiki).
|
axilmar
Member #1,204
April 2001
|
"White Chicks" is also one of my favorite comedies, although I doubt anyone in here will like it, since it's quite politically incorrect for American standards. It's from the Wayans brothers. Unlike other Wayans attempts, this is watchable and very funny. |
Derezo
Member #1,666
April 2001
![]() |
A few non-recent movies I've recently enjoyed: Mark Oates said: Jesus Camp is good. It sounded intriguing, so I skimmed through it last night. Wow. "He who controls the stuffing controls the Universe" |
Trent Gamblin
Member #261
April 2000
![]() |
I'm still watching Home Alone 2. Highly recommended.
|
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
Downloading then....
|
Dennis
Member #1,090
July 2003
![]() |
--- 0xDB | @dennisbusch_de --- |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
Hell yes. Seen it.
|
blargmob
Member #8,356
February 2007
![]() |
Anything with Sandra Bullock. --- |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
A'right.. Nothing with Sandra Bull, but these look worthy downloading(and I'm doing it right now): *Being John Malkovich @axil @Arthur @Prolonged Ball But downloading the other two, they look like nice movies. Thanks. P.S: Silent paratroopers on a U.S. town without any sirens look like a good start of a good comedy.. Pilot's helmets on the paratroopers make it even more promising [edited couple of times during first 10 min after posting]
|
verthex
Member #11,340
September 2009
![]() |
type568 said: It isn't watchable without a 6 can of beer. With the exception of Point Break, all Patrick Swayze movies are bleh!
|
OICW
Member #4,069
November 2003
![]() |
When into the Clint Eastwood films, I really recommend Dirty Harry and all subsequent films (though the last one was weak in my opinion). And also another gem from Stanley Kubrick: Doctor Strangelove, or how I stopped worrying and started to love the bomb [My website][CppReference][Pixelate][Allegators worldwide][Who's online] |
Timorg
Member #2,028
March 2002
|
Recently the film The Fall of the Roman Empire was suggested to me. It falls under the class of an epic film I guess, (188 minutes). I really enjoyed it, so it might be worth a look. Edit: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
Watched Clerks 2.. Weaker than first one, kinda of.. First one delivered some point of view regarding.. A layer of society, and in second I've barely seen any meaning. Also structure of the movies is too similar for it to be interesting for the second time.. Will download the above suggestions.
|
axilmar
Member #1,204
April 2001
|
type568 said: Watched Clerks 2.. Weaker than first one, kinda of.. First one delivered some point of view regarding.. A layer of society, and in second I've barely seen any meaning. Also structure of the movies is too similar for it to be interesting for the second time.. Indeed weaker, but there is meaning to it. The characters argue at rant about things that seem meaningless initially, but there is a hidden meaning about life's course, success, failures, relationships, etc. It's about reaching middle age. Plus, Rosario Dawson is hot! |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
She doesn't qualify my waist requirements, but other than that she is.
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
type568 said: She doesn't qualify my waist requirements, but other than that she is. You heartbreaker! She's crying her eyes out right now! [EDIT] I looked her up in Wikipedia, and when I saw "(born May 9, 1979)" I thought "OMG! Jailbait!" then I saw "(age 31)" and thought "NOOOO!!! Time is passing way too fast!" They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
Nah, I'm a good boy. I care about female hearts Append:
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
type568 said: Hm, how old are you yourself Arthur, to be measuring time with age of girls around? I'm 53, and I was alluding to how time passes faster as you age. 1979 seems less than 20 years ago to me. Quote: I care about female hearts That thoracic area is rather attractive. {"name":"rosario_dawson_sheryl_nields_main.jpg","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/1\/7\/175c4490f560d0a0db5e06c8b27f8907.jpg","w":365,"h":367,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/1\/7\/175c4490f560d0a0db5e06c8b27f8907"} They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
Agreed. And while the waist isn't visible, it's just purrfect
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
type568 said: Aha, I'm not the one editing posts while they're being replied It was clearly marked as an edit. Also, there seem to be different timescales in my mind, the reign of the i80486 seems to me to be as old as the presidency of John F. Kennedy somehow. (Yes, I do remember that) They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
You sound like you think that I blame you in doing something wrong. I don't have single case on A.cc when someone edited a post and said he hasn't written something he has, nor do I remember anyone accusing anyone in doing so.. Nor it is so this time But a case when someone writes something, and adds something to their post but someone replying their old post- is damn common with myself. Well- not only As of 486.. Well, it IS damn old. And Kennedy got killed, wasn't he? I think the same happened with Jesus Christ quite a while ago.
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
![]() |
type568 said: And Kennedy got killed, wasn't he? I think the same happened with Jesus Christ quite a while ago. I'm pretty certain they were golfing buddies.
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
![]() |
JC was back in ENIAC times, I don't directly remember either one. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
type568
Member #8,381
March 2007
![]() |
So who of these 2 guys died first?
|
|
|