|
|
| Google announces new OS |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
BAF said: I can do tons of stuff you would never dream of on a normal phone - watch TV from my slingbox I would never dream of wanting to ever watch video on anything less than a 14" screen.
|
|
Goalie Ca
Member #2,579
July 2002
|
LennyLen said: I would never dream of wanting to ever watch video on anything less than a 14" screen. Well, I don't you take a bus/train/plane that often. ------------- |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Goalie Ca said: Well, I don't you take a bus/train/plane that often. I used to take buses every day. I would read to pass the time.
|
|
relay01
Member #6,988
March 2006
|
The small screen is not a problem if it's a good quality screen. Plus when your board on public transit or whatever, beggars can't be choosers. Oh and I hate reading so the book thing doesn't work for me. _____________________________________ |
|
decepto
Member #7,102
April 2006
|
relay01 said: If you hold the screen closer to your face, then it feels like a 100 inch screen. I keep telling my wife that, but she won't listen. -------------------------------------------------- |
|
FMC
Member #4,431
March 2004
|
relay01 said: For instance. Laptops, as good as they can be, haven't and simply can't replace a desktop computer. Citation needed! Hell, i myself use a laptop whenever not doing heavy (videogames, rendering, compression, ...) stuff. Laptops are smaller, quieter and more practical. [FMC Studios] - [Caries Field] - [Ctris] - [Pman] - [Chess for allegroites] |
|
Thomas Harte
Member #33
April 2000
|
FMC said: I don't really agree on this: most of the "average joes"s i know are now using a laptop. I own only a laptop. A three-year old laptop. It does everything I want from a computer. [My site] [Tetrominoes] |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
|
If you have no desire to compute on the go, desktops are much cheaper for a given level of power. Otherwise, why waste money on a second computer? Not to mention the hassle of trying to sync everything. They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
|
relay01
Member #6,988
March 2006
|
Ok, to elaborate. On a home user level, laptops could probably replace desktops for the most part on a day to day basis. But having a laptop is essentially having all your eggs in one basket and a nightmare to support. The hardware replacements/upgrades you can do for a laptop are for the most part limited to RAM, HD, and battery. But anything else breaks hardware wise on a laptop, unless it's under warranty usually means you need to get a new laptop. On a business/office level, having laptops as your primary computer source is possibly the worst thing that business/office could do, unless they love just throwing money and time away. (Please spare the requested citations on what I'm about to say next since I'm speaking from experience in the IT field as opposed to from a textbook) Personally, I feel it very necessary to have multiple computers. I will even use multiple computers at the same time in many cases. But I know I'm not the average computer user, and many would be fine with just one. _____________________________________ |
|
Karadoc ~~
Member #2,749
September 2002
|
Arthur Kalliokoski said: If you have no desire to compute on the go, desktops are much cheaper for a given level of power. But laptops are smaller and quieter and easier to setup - and are portable. Even if you don't want to take your computer out of the house, portability is good so that you can computer on a couch, or at your desk, or just so that you can easily move your computer out of the way when you aren't using it. -- and laptops are pretty cheap these days. If it wasn't for high-end games, I wouldn't bother with a desktop. ----------- |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Karadoc ~~ said: But laptops are smaller and quieter and easier to setup Smaller isn't necessarily better. I myself don't like laptops because the screens are too small, the keyboards are too small and track-pads are way too small and fiddly for me to be able to use with any accuracy. Sure, I could plug in an extra keyboard, mouse and monitor, but then I just have an under-powered desktop machine.
|
|
FMC
Member #4,431
March 2004
|
LennyLen said: I could plug in an extra keyboard, mouse and monitor, but then I just have an under-powered desktop machine. I plug in a mouse, and feel good. [FMC Studios] - [Caries Field] - [Ctris] - [Pman] - [Chess for allegroites] |
|
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
|
LennyLen said: Smaller isn't necessarily better. I myself don't like laptops because the screens are too small, the keyboards are too small and track-pads are way too small and fiddly for me to be able to use with any accuracy. Sure, I could plug in an extra keyboard, mouse and monitor, but then I just have an under-powered desktop machine. I rather like my new laptop. Spent a whole $940 cad on it, and its a dual core Core2 @ 2.53GHz, w/2G ram (w/room for 2G more), a 15.1" WXGA+ LED backlit screen, and a 9 cell battery that gives me 5 hours or more of uptime, even when the power is out \o/ Now I could have spent about as much on a new quadcore desktop, but I already have 3 quad core desktop class machines, what I really wanted was a portable machine I could move around easily (yay for redundancy), and one that I could work at even on the couch, or in my room, or heck, ON MY DECK (yay for rhyming). -- |
|
|
|