![]() |
|
Tsunami |
Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
![]() |
And the offtopicness award goes to hazul... I don't like the idea that the future is predictable, meaning our timeline is set in stone. I want to have real intelligense and not just be a machine whos choices depend on physical laws. I think this thread has gone sidetrack... |
Evert
Member #794
November 2000
![]() |
Quote: I don't like the idea that the future is predictable, meaning our timeline is set in stone. I want to have real intelligense and not just be a machine whos choices depend on physical laws. You'll be glad to learn that according to the laws of physics, the future is not predictable. |
kazzmir
Member #1,786
December 2001
![]() |
Quote: I want to have real intelligense and not just be a machine whos choices depend on physical laws. But maybe unhappy to learn that you are just an incredibly complex machine. |
Karadoc ~~
Member #2,749
September 2002
![]() |
Quote: Actually, the logic behind the Bible Code is pretty sensible. It's a load of crap, but it's not stupid crap. Yeah but it doesn't matter at all what the 'code' actually is. If someone comes up with the code, or the information, after some event has happened then they cannot say that they predicted it. There are countless possible codes that would seem logical, but they are still just codes that some crackpot made up so that they could squeeze something out of the book that vaguely resembles what is going on. No one has managed to come up with anything like that to get what will happen, only what has happened - surprise surprise. Quote: But maybe unhappy to learn that you are just an incredibly complex machine.
----------- |
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
23yrold3yrold
Member #1,134
March 2001
![]() |
Quote: Yeah but it doesn't matter at all what the 'code' actually is. If someone comes up with the code, or the information, after some event has happened then they cannot say that they predicted it.
The entire point was that the predictions couldn't be found until after the fact, though. It's like sealing a prediction in an envelope and giving it to a friend (so you can't cheat), then telling him to open it after the event. -- |
wearetheborg
Queen of the Universe
June 2003
|
Quote: I wish to be welcomed to a.cc as well. And with warmth. \o/
__________________ |
Trezker
Member #1,739
December 2001
![]() |
Quote: It's like sealing a prediction in an envelope and giving it to a friend (so you can't cheat), then telling him to open it after the event.
But that's different, the prediction really exists before the event. |
Evert
Member #794
November 2000
![]() |
Quote: Actually, the logic behind the Bible Code is pretty sensible. It's a load of crap, but it's not stupid crap.
Quote: There are countless possible codes that would seem logical, but they are still just codes that some crackpot made up so that they could squeeze something out of the book that vaguely resembles what is going on.
I read The DaVinci Code not too long back. The plot is based on hidden messages in texts, double meanings, cryptography and anagrams - including texts from the bible or ancient works of art. All very cleverly found and put together to suggest a consistent whole, but fiction none the less (though Dan Brown apparently thinks differently). You can apparently find whatever you want to find as long as you search long enough and selectively discard information that doesn't fit. |
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
Love thy neighbour! Now why do people search for hidden messages in the Bible, when the open message should be the important thing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
23yrold3yrold
Member #1,134
March 2001
![]() |
Quote: But that's different, the prediction really exists before the event.
Then it's not different at all. -- |
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
![]() |
Quote:
Anybody can go around saying that such-and-such 'predicted' such-and-such event. But the whole thing is just stupid if the predictions are made after the event. These people say that they've found the special code for understanding the bible (or whatever), and if you use this special code to read the bible then it tells you that this terrible event will happen.
I thought I said that... just with less words... Though, you know why they're trying to figure out the bible code, right? Stock market numbers, oh baby! -----sig: |
|
|