I KNOW WHERE SADDAM AND USAMA ARE HIDING!
But first some comments:

I think most of us would rather see GWB assassinated than Manjula. (Is this the smiley wondering whether this was a nice thing or bad thing to say?)

I guess they might find UK on the map, but they haven't the slightest idea of what middle east stands for.

Back to Saddam & Usama. Well, this is so obvious that someone must have figured this out already. They are hiding at the Iraqi WMD base.

Ace: i love to give a completely biased and un-thought rant sometimes too.

we don't need a president that is a genius, we need a president that is a leader. george bush is just that. just because he came into office right in time for a major terrorist attack and foriegn threat doesn't mean he is a bad president. no he's not another JFK, but he is our president and he needs our support because he is. and i can guarentee you that 47 of our 50 states would not pass an "our president sucks" bill. that is just another biased opinion of yours.

no you see ... hitler would have been good if he had stopped at minor "reforms". going beyond to the destruction of the jews, the perfect race, war, and the killing of all of those people was what made him evil. do you see thousands of jews a week being shipped off to camps in the middle of Nevada by Bush, hell no. being a leader is only one of the things that makes Bush a good president.

Guantanamo is not a concentration camp for a segregated religious, racial, or political group. it is a prison camp for Al-Queda prisoners ... AKA prisoners of war.

[edit]

i quote an article on Guatanamo:

... does that sound alot better than being severely over-worked, barely fed, tortured, and eventually killed and cremated?

I'm sorry; when were we at war with Al-Queda? I don't recall that.

In any case, the war is over. I've read quite a bit of how they're breaking the Geneva convention over there. If this makes Bush better than Hitler, it ain't by much.

There are innocents in Guantanamo too. And the treatment is far from fair; do a search for Guantanamo on Google news. I read a long article from a reporter there that was pretty damning; if the GameDev Politics forum was still up, I'd go find it. Here's a quickie from Google News:

And I'm hardly the first person to compare Bush to Hitler; in fact, I'm not even the thousand and first. I know people who are planning on leaving the country if he gets a second term.

See edit The conditions at Guantanamo are pretty well known as pitiful ...

We're not saying they're any better, and that's not even relevant.

I heard someone make a good point not too long ago; the only way a dictatorship succeeds is if the people living in it think they're living in freedom. I'm not ready to say Bush is as bad as Hitler (a stretch, to say the least) but I'm going to be keeping a very close eye on next year's elections ...

That "Bush Sucks" bill thing was just a JOKE, btw.

And comparing Bush to Hitler is not fair... for Hitler. Bush is just as evil as Hitler; however, there is no one willing to admit it.

Sure, Bush may not have committed mass genocide, but he set the record for the most executions of any governor. It's the same thing on a smaller scale. Capital punishment is just as wrong as any other form of murder.

Bush wants to open up the oil fields in Alaska which would effect the enviornment up there when we have plenty of oil coming from Texas. Plus, totally destroyed the quality of Texas' enviornment during his term as governor. I'm not sure about Hitler's concern for the enviornment, but I don't think it could have been as bad as Bush's.

And that is just the tip of the iceberg. He gave HUGE tax cuts which in time will hurt the middle class by taking away money from programs that desperately need the money.

And because of the way he has run things, millions of people are unemployed and it is really hard to find a job.

I could probably go on.

You may not think that these things I pointed out are as evil as what Hitler did, but I say they are and I'm sure someone will back me up here.

Bush is not fit to be our president. He never was and he never will be. He got into the office through scandal, and his presidency up to now has been the same.

- Ace

Just posting for fun ...

That's funny, because I read an article about a how one of the newspapers counted the votes in seven different ways. Five of the ways showing that Gore would have won. The newspaper concluded that had the votes been counted correctly, Gore would have won. Had the votes been counted in the way Gore would have wanted them to be counted, he would have lost.

I'll try to dig up this article, it's somewhere out on the net. And yes, the article came from someone with credentials. I orginally got it from Yahoo news, but it seems to have since been deleted from there.

Edit: Not the article I mentioned, but a very interesting read: [url http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=10589]

Edit2: And another: [url http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1115-02.htm]

Personally, I believe that Jeb Bush and his cronies had a part to play because something wasn't done right in Florida.

Twenty years from now we may see thousands of Gore votes pop up in the Gulf.

And Bush may not have invaded Canada, Greenland, and Mexico, but he has invaded Iraq. I've also heard talks a while back about him wanting to attack Korea. At least Hitler's invasions got him closer to his ultimate goal. I'm not sure what Bush's ultimate goals are.

Bush may or may not have had anything to do with 9/11, but whatever the case, it could have been handled a lot better.

Just to clear up any cofusion, I'm not a Hitler supported.

- Ace