<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Excessive Hard Drive Access in Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.allegro.cc/forums/view/593611</link>
		<description>Allegro.cc Forum Thread</description>
		<webMaster>matthew@allegro.cc (Matthew Leverton)</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	</channel>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Hello, I&#39;m having problems in Windows Vista, something keeps continually accessing the hard drive. Could it be a virus? Possibly - I have many, many automatic updates that fail to install from the auto-updater. But if it&#39;s a virus, SpyBot can&#39;t find it.</p><p>I suspect that this may be Some Windows Vista Thing (SWVT) that doesn&#39;t care that I want to run my programs, it&#39;s just doing its own job and to hell with user experience. If so, how can I track this process down and kill it?</p><p>I&#39;ve tried the task/process manager, which only lists CPU usage, not disk usage. There don&#39;t seem to be any likely culprits in the tasks with &gt; 0 CPU. How can I hunt this thing down?
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Myrdos)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>How much RAM do you have installed? It sounds like the system is accessing a pagefile. That would be my first guess...
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Edward Sheets)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 04:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>I suspect the Indexing Service in the Drawing Room with the Candlestick.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (gnolam)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 04:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Yes, just yesterday a coworker said he uninstalled Vista because it was continuously indexing files. Someone else said there was a way to disable it, so you should check the services to disable it.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (ReyBrujo)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>I have 1 gig of RAM. But I don&#39;t think it&#39;s paging anything... nothing&#39;s running! I&#39;ll check out this indexing service.</p><p>I know Vista tries to load the most frequently used applications into RAM, but surely that can&#39;t explain the volume of activity I&#39;m seeing.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Myrdos)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Isn&#39;t that a bit low for vista? Like another maybe... 100% might be good.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Jonatan Hedborg)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Dude, you need to run with at least 2 GB of ram with Vista if you don&#39;t want paging. A coworker has it installed, and of the 4GB he has, .75GB is taken away for video memory. All because he only has a 256MB video card. My XP machine has more RAM for programs as a result (though only like .25GB, but still)
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (MiquelFire)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Where do you get the 750MB for video figure? I have two video cards and dwm.exe is using 32MB of RAM. </p><p>I have 2GB of RAM and 1GB is currently being used by Windows and applications with the rest being used for cache.</p><p>Open up the Resource Manager under the Windows Task Manager / Performance. Click on Disk to see what is using it.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Matthew Leverton)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Quote:</div><div class="quote"><p>
Dude, you need to run with at least 2 GB of ram with Vista if you don&#39;t want paging.
</p></div></div><p>Untrue.  I guess we must assume that the more memory you give it, the more it will take.  I didn&#39;t know that the OS could allocate more memory for the video card if it wanted to, though.  Seems awfully useless and wasteful, especially for someone who doesn&#39;t even play video games.  (I&#39;m hinting disbelief at the statement regarding video memory above.)</p><p>My laptop has 1GB of RAM with the video card capable of stealing up to 256MB I believe.  (I don&#39;t recall how much Vista lets it take.)  After disabling unneeded things like the file indexing service and other unneeded items, it runs like a charm.  No noticeable slowdowns or odd fits of disk activity.  Not that I use it much, but still...</p><p>I&#39;m surprised nobody took the bait:
</p><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Quote:</div><div class="quote"><p>
Hello, I&#39;m having problems in Windows Vista, something keeps continually accessing the hard drive. Could it be a virus?
</p></div></div><p>Yes, you installed Vista.  <img src="http://www.allegro.cc/forums/smileys/wink.gif" alt=";)" />
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (StevenVI)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>How do you know he installed Vista? Coulda come preinstalled on a computer he bought.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (BAF)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Quote:</div><div class="quote"><p>
A coworker has it installed, and of the 4GB he has, .75GB is taken away for video memory. All because he only has a 256MB video card.
</p></div></div><p>
Is he running the 64 bit version? In that case go into BIOS and change the settings to allow extended memory. This isn&#39;t a vista issue, it&#39;s a hardware limitation.</p><p>Keep in mind if he&#39;s running the 32bit version don&#39;t do this, I only get 2GB of ram in XP now with this setting enabled.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Hard Rock)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>I got the 750MB from the system properties (or whatever they may have renamed it to) because we were curious to know if 32-bit would display 4GB instead of 3.5GB like XP does. Basically, Vista gave us this breakdown of memory on his system:<br />RAM: 3.25GB<br />System video: 750MB<br />On board video: 256MB<br />Total video: 1GB</p><p>[edit] BTW, it&#39;s the 32-bit version. Also, I think it was (re)installed when he got it anyway because none of Dell&#39;s programs are anywhere to be seen.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (MiquelFire)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Yeah if you are on a 32-bit operating system (Linux, Vista, etc), you aren&#39;t going to be able to address all 4GB. It will probably be closer to 3GB.</p><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Quote:</div><div class="quote"><p>
RAM: 3.25GB<br />System video: 750MB<br />On board video: 256MB<br />Total video: 1GB
</p></div></div><p>
<s>I&#39;ve never seen such a thing under Vista.</s><br />I found it buried in the &quot;View and print details&quot; page. According to one source, it is &quot;((Total System Memory – 512)/2 – Dedicated System Memory)&quot; </p><p>For example, mine reads:
</p><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Quote:</div><div class="quote"><p>
Total available graphics memory 1023 MB <br />        Dedicated graphics memory 256 MB <br />        Dedicated system memory 0 MB <br />        Shared system memory 767 MB
</p></div></div><p>
</p><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Microsoft said:</div><div class="quote"><p>
The shared memory is available to other subsystems or non-graphics applications when it is not being used by the graphics subsystem. Thus, it is never guaranteed to be available for graphics because it could already be in use.
</p></div></div><p>
The &quot;shared system memory&quot; is allocated on demand and the number only represents a maximum amount. It is not reserved or guaranteed to be available.</p><p>But it still remains impossible to address 4GB with a 32-bit system (since other devices need to be memory mapped as well). And surely that&#39;s the source of &quot;missing RAM&quot; on your coworker&#39;s computer.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Matthew Leverton)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>I&#39;ve noticed this with XP as well. I keep getting this grambling from the HD like it is indexing files. I can sometimes get it to stop by accessing the hard drive from My Computer, but that does not always work. I believe it may be a virus or spyware, but I am not too worried right now. My Linux box is fine, so hehehe...if it is a virus, well let us just say paybacks are a <span class="cuss"><span>bitch</span></span>! Can viruses and or spyware still be active on a drive when that drive is not mounted? Say for example the drive infected has windows, but under Linux that drive is still making noise sometimes like it is being accessed. I can tell the difference between the two drives. It only seems to happen when that drive gets mounted. Maybe a root kit installed on my windows box?
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Don Freeman)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>I fully recommend these tools to any Windows users who want to know what their computer is doing.<br /><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/default.mspx">Windows SysInternals</a></p><p>Specifically , <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/ProcessesAndThreads/ProcessExplorer.mspx">Process Explorer</a> kicks task managers butt hardcore.8-)</p><p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/ProcessesAndThreads/Filemon.mspx">Filemon</a> File activity monitor.<br /><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/FileAndDisk/Diskmon.mspx">Diskmon</a> Disk activity monitor.<br /><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/ProcessesAndThreads/Regmon.mspx">Regmon</a> Registry monitor</p><p>Lots of other cool stuff.</p><p>- Edit -<br />- Don Freeman - <br />All that disk access you hear might be your anti-virus on access scanning in progress. I have a copy of Microsoft Digital Image Pro 9 that I got super cheap ($10) from nothingbutsoftware.com. Every time I want to save a file my AV thinks it needs to scan the entire database that MDI uses (15 - 20 seconds wasted) <img src="http://www.allegro.cc/forums/smileys/tongue.gif" alt=":P" /></p><p>- 2nd Edit -
</p><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Don Freeman said:</div><div class="quote"><p>
Maybe a root kit installed on my windows box?
</p></div></div><p>

Another cool program from SysInternals. <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/Security/RootkitRevealer.mspx">Rootkit Revealer</a>
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Edgar Reynaldo)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Quote:</div><div class="quote"><p>
Dude, you need to run with at least 2 GB of ram with Vista if you don&#39;t want paging.
</p></div></div><p>Now, I had always understood that resources are freed up for applications when required. So it wouldn&#39;t matter if you&#39;re running a resource hog like Vista, when you actually play a game, the game should run at roughly the same speed as on XP. Is this true?</p><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Quote:</div><div class="quote"><p>
Open up the Resource Manager under the Windows Task Manager / Performance. Click on Disk to see what is using it.
</p></div></div><p>I&#39;ll give that a try the next time I&#39;m in Windows.</p><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">Quote:</div><div class="quote"><p>
How do you know he installed Vista?
</p></div></div><p>I installed it. <img src="http://www.allegro.cc/forums/smileys/tongue.gif" alt=":P" /> It was free from the University.</p><p>Edgar Reynaldo: Thanks! I&#39;ll try those also, and see what I can discover.</p><p>Turning of indexing appeared to do nothing... hard drive access was still continuous. But it doesn&#39;t feel like paging... when I get paging on other OSes, the performance degrades severely as I wait for things to be loaded from disk. I would see delays when I first start the app, when I exit it and re-load Windows desktop stuff, when I load new areas in a game, etc. I don&#39;t see that here.</p><p>In my case, it&#39;s like there&#39;s another process running in the background, competing for resources. The game is Morrowind, from 2002, and it&#39;s running on a high-end machine I bought a couple months ago. There&#39;s no way it should run slowly.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Myrdos)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>I&#39;ve had no problems with hard drive access. The indexer only runs in the background, so that shouldn&#39;t be a problem...</p><p>If you have a spare USB flash drive (512+MB is best), you could plug it in and use it as a fast cache via &quot;ReadyBoost.&quot; It might help determine whether or not low memory is an issue.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Matthew Leverton)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Well, it looks like it is paging after all. The resource monitor reports 50 megs/minute being written to pagefile.sys. I guess I&#39;ll throw another stick of RAM in there and see what happens. It doesn&#39;t help that the auto-updater keeps trying and failing to install the same updates over and over again.</p><p>I tried using my USB key for Ready Boost, but it&#39;s not supported somehow.</p><p>Thanks for all the help!
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Myrdos)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>[joke]<br />Hmm... Filemon, Diskmon, Regmon? Are those three legendary pokemons or digimons? <img src="http://www.allegro.cc/forums/smileys/tongue.gif" alt=":P" /><br />[/joke]
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (ReyBrujo)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Heh, you gave <i>everyone</i> a cookie except me and yet I was correct about the pagefile. That&#39;s the last time I help you, McCallum. <img src="http://www.allegro.cc/forums/smileys/tongue.gif" alt=":P" />
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Edward Sheets)</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Ahh... oops, I thought I gave <b>everyone</b> a cookie. <img src="http://www.allegro.cc/forums/smileys/undecided.gif" alt=":-/" /></p><p>They&#39;re bad for you anyways.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Myrdos)</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>True that. <img src="http://www.allegro.cc/forums/smileys/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></p><p>Anyway, glad to hear you found the problem. Sounds like Vista is one memory-hungry beast. At this point I can&#39;t think of a good reason to install Vista. But if and when I get a new computer I&#39;ll probably have to deal with it (Vista). Hopefully a few bugs will be worked out by then.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Edward Sheets)</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><div class="quote_container"><div class="title">ReyBrujo said:</div><div class="quote"><p>
Hmm... Filemon, Diskmon, Regmon? Are those three legendary pokemons or digimons?
</p></div></div><p>

Digimons of course!8-)
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Edgar Reynaldo)</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 09:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>My laptop is running Vista with 512Mb RAM and 1.6 GHz processor.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Neil Black)</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>Are you using the AeroGlass feature though?
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Edgar Reynaldo)</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
</rss>
