<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Update about my previous code</title>
		<link>http://www.allegro.cc/forums/view/582630</link>
		<description>Allegro.cc Forum Thread</description>
		<webMaster>matthew@allegro.cc (Matthew Leverton)</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	</channel>
	<item>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="mockup v2"><p>I&#39;m creating a new thread because the allegro.cc won&#39;t allow me to reply to the old one.</p><p>Any way I&#39;ve fixed a few minor bugs in the blit code I posted a few weeks ago and I finally created a diff patch as well. The only problem is that it is bigger then I expected.  I made some other changes that should probably get a look over as well. Oh yeah and the changes I made to the Mode-X blit functions should probably be left out all together. I just don&#39;t know enough about Mode-X to create something that blits efficiently.</p><p>I&#39;m posting the diff here because it&#39;s big and I don&#39;t want to send it to the dev list if it would just annoy people and I don&#39;t know enough about diff yet to make any edits to the file. Someone please give me some advice.  Is some or all of the code usefull and worthy of a patch to Al 4.2? What should I do with it? I&#39;m sure this new patch works 100% but then again I&#39;m only 99.99% sure.  I fixed the 24 and 32 bit MMX errors where the last few pixels were not drawn and I&#39;m working on a test program that will graph out the speed vs. bitmap size/alignment to give a nice visual representation of all the blit functions performances.<br />Any give me some feedback (that is if anyone decides to check out the code) I&#39;m just way I&#39;m tired and I&#39;ve got to record some crazy band tomorrow so zzzzzz :} (wish there was a sleepy smily face thing. it would get the point accross more easily.)</p><p>almost forgot the diff is attatched here if I did it right.
</p></div>]]>
		</description>
		<author>no-reply@allegro.cc (Ron Novy)</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
	</item>
</rss>
