Problem with virtual screen and set_gfx_mode http://www.allegro.cc/forums/view/404906 Allegro.cc Forum Thread matthew@allegro.cc (Matthew Leverton) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:30:38 +0000

I'm trying to simple create a screen with 640x480 res and a larger virtual screen size (say 1024x1024) No matter what size I try to make the virtual screen, set_gfx_mode fails with "Unsupported virtual resolution". This is on a system with a TNT2 Model64 pro so I'm sure theres plenty of Video Ram
Any advice would be appreciated since this is the first time I've tried to use this feature! ;D

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Number Six) Tue, 07 Sep 2004 21:02:51 +0000

Not all drivers can do this. As far as I know, Windows' DirectX windowed driver cannot, for instance.
So... what operating system and Allegro version are you using?

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Evert) Tue, 07 Sep 2004 21:07:44 +0000

Aye Sir! The same problem happens here. Looks like its something that some videocards (or anything else) cant do. I needed to do a turn-around. You can make a simple scrolling system with some few variables. Problably this is not what you want, but its the only way I found...

EDIT: beaten...

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Carl Divston) Tue, 07 Sep 2004 21:09:00 +0000

Oh yeah sorry! :-/

On this platform its Windows 2000 DX9.0b Allegro 4.1.14!
I'll try it at home on my WinXP Gforce-4 Ti box...

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Number Six) Tue, 07 Sep 2004 21:13:00 +0000

AFAIK there's no real reason to use the virtual screen parameters instead of create_video_bitmap() anyway...

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (gnolam) Tue, 07 Sep 2004 21:21:56 +0000

The Windows gfx drivers do not support virtual screens. You can still create extra video bitmaps, but you won't be able to scroll the screen smoothly. Note though that other drivers do require a virtual screen if you want to use extra VRAM. If ALLEGRO_VRAM_SINGLE_SURFACE (IIRC) is defined, create a virtual screen. If not, leave those parameters 0 and just pray.

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Kitty Cat) Wed, 08 Sep 2004 05:07:05 +0000
Quote:

AFAIK there's no real reason to use the virtual screen parameters instead of create_video_bitmap() anyway...

So does that mean I have to try and do it with page flipping?
Damn! I knew it was too good to be true..

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Number Six) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:30:54 +0000

I think only the DOS or linux VGA drivers support any kind of virtual screen. The rest all make you create video_bitmaps.

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Thomas Fjellstrom) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:37:26 +0000

Oh I think I'm (finally) getting it! <Touches wood!>

So do you make a large video_bitmap say (1280x960), instead of the large virual screen, and then blit from whereever you wanted in that video_bitmap area to the screen?
Not as easy but not that difficult either.

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Number Six) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:50:57 +0000

All DOS drivers and all Unix/X drivers do (sort of.. DGA2 requires a virtual screen but it has access to all VRAM regardless of what virtual screen size you specify). I'm not sure about OSX.

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Kitty Cat) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:52:25 +0000

Uh? X11 modes can't have a virtual screen, can they? Its like GDI in windows...

Number6: I'd actually create a second bitmap that you store the cached sprites in. or make one for each, butthat might be overdoing it ;)

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Thomas Fjellstrom) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:06:12 +0000
Quote:

X11 modes can't have a virtual screen, can they? Its like GDI in windows...

It's a hack. But yes, virtual screens and scrolling do work with the X11 driver.

]]> no-reply@allegro.cc (Evert) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:30:38 +0000