|
Which allegro version is recommended by you? |
SomeoneConfused
Member #15,890
February 2015
|
Hello. |
Gideon Weems
Member #3,925
October 2003
|
Elias
Member #358
May 2000
|
SomeoneConfused said: But I'm also aware that there may be bugs included. No, 5.1.x just has an "unstable" API, as in, a function may get added but if it turns out people don't like it may get removed again before the next "stable" version 5.2.0. It's not likely to happen and I don't know if it ever did - but it's the risk there is with using any of the new 5.1.x features before they are declared final. There should not be any more or less bugs than in 5.0.10. -- |
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
|
Elias said: No, 5.1.x just has an "unstable" API, as in, a function may get added but if it turns out people don't like it may get removed again before the next "stable" version 5.2.0. It's not likely to happen and I don't know if it ever did - but it's the risk there is with using any of the new 5.1.x features before they are declared final. Actually, some APIs have changed significantly after being added to a WIP branch, before a "Stable" release is made. -- |
Elias
Member #358
May 2000
|
In my memory those things were usually changed in git already before making it into a first WIP release. -- |
|