|
Planck's Matrix |
Paul whoknows
Member #5,081
September 2004
|
kazzmir
Member #1,786
December 2001
|
What a fucking nutjob. |
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
|
kazzmir said: What a fucking nutjob. Hey He's using science! He said so himself. In fact, it's science that's sooo new, it's soo new, that it's not even in the books yet. It also looks like he's found a good audience of suckers (based on their reactions.) I feel sorry for them for being so easily manipulated. -- |
kazzmir
Member #1,786
December 2001
|
I liked his first question. "How many people think they have a power in their body they are not using". I'll take "appendix" for 500. |
Paul whoknows
Member #5,081
September 2004
|
This Planck's matrix and the Higgs field is the same thing? ____ "The unlimited potential has been replaced by the concrete reality of what I programmed today." - Jordan Mechner. |
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Why... why do you even have to ask? -- |
Mark Oates
Member #1,146
March 2001
|
gnolam said: Why... why do you even have to ask? You obviously don't have the feelings, gnolam. The feeeelings. -- |
Paul whoknows
Member #5,081
September 2004
|
Does anyone here know who Max Planck is? I feel nobody knows what the heck I'm talking about ____ "The unlimited potential has been replaced by the concrete reality of what I programmed today." - Jordan Mechner. |
Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
|
Could somebody give me a summary of the videos? I ain't got time for dat! They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas. |
weapon_S
Member #7,859
October 2006
|
I think most people here have a general idea of who Max Planck is. I haven't heard Planck mentioned yet. |
MiquelFire
Member #3,110
January 2003
|
Arthur Kalliokoski said: Could somebody give me a summary of the videos? I ain't got time for dat! I ain't got time either. --- |
Tobias Dammers
Member #2,604
August 2002
|
Mark Oates said: You obviously don't have the feelings, gnolam. Yes. Science is all about feelings and having the most awesome pictures. --- |
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Paul whoknows said: Does anyone here know who Max Planck is?
One of the most famous physicists of all time, whose name is attached to about a gazillion high impact research institutes and whose constant is embedded in a significant fraction of my professional work? Nope, doesn't ring a bell inequality. -- |
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
He was the one that introduced the term "plancking" as a way of getting the attention of the students. {"name":"607297","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/2\/22152499a0e1a39a933fe23c902865ec.jpg","w":417,"h":276,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/2\/22152499a0e1a39a933fe23c902865ec"} ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Years of thorough research have revealed that what people find beautiful about the Mandelbrot set is not the set itself, but all the rest. |
Derezo
Member #1,666
April 2001
|
Mark Oates said: It also looks like he's found a good audience of suckers Gregg Braden has a cult following. I imagine most of the people at his "seminars" hang on his word much like the congregation of any other church. I like his Mars videos the best. They're hilarious. "He who controls the stuffing controls the Universe" |
|