Allegro.cc - Online Community

Allegro.cc Forums » Off-Topic Ordeals » "Cuties" (2020)

This thread is locked; no one can reply to it. rss feed Print
"Cuties" (2020)
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

I'm too tired to come up with unique content for this post so I'm just going to quote what I said in IRC. :P

00:22  * bambams is watching the infamous "Cuties".
00:22 <+bambams> There's only about 20 minutes left. So probably fair to
                 critique it now.
00:22 <+bambams> As with most movies that cause a stir and outrage, I suggest
                 you watch it. :)
00:22 <+bambams> It's nowhere near as bad as people are making out.
00:23 <+bambams> I would say it's probably more or less documenting what young
                 girls/women are currently experiencing, and it makes men
                 uncomfortable so you're not allowed to do it. Hah.
00:26 <+bambams> Thus far I haven't seen anything that I found offensive. There
                 has been one 5 minute scene that stood out as just being out
                 of context. And the choreography (sp?) and camera work was
                 pretty suggestive, but I interpretted it not as necessarily
                 being a real "scene" in the movie, but a scene literally
                 designed to make the audience uncomfortable.
00:27 <+bambams> The film has a lot of opportunity to exploit these girls, and
                 it DOES NOT do that.
00:27 <+bambams> I'd even argue that it's artistically well made.
00:27 <+bambams> And likely it is only upsetting American audiences because
                 they're so prudish about sex. :P
00:31 <+bambams> On the downside, now Netflix has recorded that I've watched
                 it, and it's French with subtitles so it probably also tracked
                 each time I had to back up to keep up with the dialogue. xD
                 Which for the most part didn't align with anything
                 incriminating, but sometimes there was dialogue during a dance
                 scene or whatever so I'm sure if you were *looking* to find
                 something you could... So there's that.
00:34 <+bambams> And a little Easter egg of sorts of an anecdote:
00:35 <+bambams> The protagonist is a young black girl. I'm too
                 autistic/stoned/tired/ignorant to know more than that. >_>
00:36 <+bambams> But basically her grandmother or at least a "old"
                 matriarch/female role model explained to this 11 year old that
                 when she was married (arranged marriage) her husband lifted
                 her dress to expose her nude body to all of his
                 friends/family. :P
00:37 <+bambams> And somehow the outrage mobs completely missed that point, and
                 are outraged that young girls growing up in the West in the
                 new millenium are exposed to sex at a young age in media and
                 it influences their development. That's not new though... We
                 all know that.
00:39 <+bambams> It kind of seems like anybody outraged by "Cuties" is actually
                 self-owning themselves by outing themselves as being
                 uncomfortable with young, developing girls. :P

Append:

01:09:28 <+bambams> Also, I'd like to add regarding the film, I think that it
                    could potentially be a positive viewing experience for
                    young girls. At least, for any of them that are dealing
                    with similar themes in their lives.
01:10:00 <+bambams> It's probably a perspective/story that isn't often told,
                    and in that sense it's kind of amusing in a sad sort of way
                    that the so called "social justice" warrior types are
                    actually trying to suppress it. :P

Append:

Now Netflix also knows that I liked it. I don't watch very many productions from outside of North America so to some extent I think it's also just refreshing to have a fresh culture's perspective on film. You see little touches that just seem to feel French. The closing scene is sort of genius.

It's a sort of happy mood; we've come back down from the film's climax and the protagonist walks into an active jump-rope in the street and begins jumping. The camera begins to rise into the sky as the protagonist continues to jump. For a moment it appears we're leaving her behind, but then she climbs back up and follows the camera up into the sky bouncing up and down into the shot. How FUCKING cool is that?!

Erin Maus
Member #7,537
July 2006
avatar

I'm thinking about watching it.

This is tangentially related...

When I was a kid I would read girl's magazines (can't remember the names unfortunately - this was like 20 years ago haha) and they gave me a lot of issues that I still sometimes struggle with. :( I remember one said (paraphrased) "guys with hairy knuckles are creeps" and it crushed me.

---
ItsyRealm, a quirky 2D/3D RPG where you fight, skill, and explore in a medieval world with horrors unimaginable.
they / she

dthompson
Member #5,749
April 2005
avatar

Film seems alright to me. Marketing was atrocious. But hey.

{"name":"612569","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/9\/0\/90ce8ef6accb09679e09d31f0432e55a.jpg","w":960,"h":540,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/9\/0\/90ce8ef6accb09679e09d31f0432e55a"}612569

______________________________________________________
Website. It was freakdesign.bafsoft.net.
This isn't a game!

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

I'm not even sure the marketing was as bad as people made it out to be. I'm not sure if this is the artwork that got them in trouble or not, but this is what I could find:

{"name":"cuties.jpeg","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/4\/24baf6ebd4ac6c742fe03f2fc91daeac.jpg","w":745,"h":827,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/4\/24baf6ebd4ac6c742fe03f2fc91daeac"}cuties.jpeg

This scene is literally the climax of the film. It's not like Netflix arranged for a custom photo-shoot for this shot (or at least if they did it's not their design, but the filmmakers'). And it's really not that bad either. Their outfits are actually pretty innocent here. You would likely experience the same or worse at any girls gymnastics or swimming event. There were more suggestive/revealing outfits earlier in the film without question too. The dancing here is very suggestive, but it's part of the plot of the movie so I don't want to spoil it.

But I think that girls would not interpret their outfits or dancing as being problematic. They are already exposed to this daily in the media, and by their peers. I don't think that girls and women interpret their bodies to be as evocative as men do. In their mind their bodies are bland, I guess. They've always had them. I think this is one of the ways in which men and women just can't understand each other.

And I think it's pretty obvious why girls that have reached puberty can make men so uncomfortable: visually they're pretty much the same as adult women, with the primary physical differentiator being breast size and hip width, but all of these changes begin to take shape during adolescence... And our prudish society is too quick to label men "pedophiles" so naturally men are defensive around young girls. Society doesn't even understand what the label means.. Being sexually attracted to a 14 year old is not pedophilia... ::) It's pretty much normal and natural. It's not as though girls go to sleep on the 6574th night of their life a little girl and wake up the next morning a woman. :P There's a whole lot of blurring the lines between child and adult during the teen years.

Age of consent laws have lead to the irrational notion that finding teenage girls sexually attractive is morally wrong and even criminal. On the contrary, "teen" is the most searched term on most porn sites. I've heard it said that if a girl isn't a professional model already by 18 then she's too old for the industry. :P I bet if people on the street were asked to guess how old models in fashion magazines were they'd be way off. The entire beauty industry is essentially trying to make women look like teens or very early 20's. 20 year olds are already worrying about signs of aging. :P Psychologists understand this all very well, but the general population and the media prefer ignorant outrage. :P

The sad thing is with it being so taboo it likely leads to more child abuse. Instead of people talking about it openly and honestly, everybody hides it. People pretend as if men don't find teenage girls attractive, but of course they generally do. And eventually lines are going to get crossed. It would be better if society was more open about it. It could help to just avoid putting people into tempting situations. And allow actual pedophiles to get professional help instead of living with it in secret and finding their own ways to cope. Imagine if pedophiles were able to just tell their families and friends that they're attracted to children. And if everybody knows then everybody can avoid putting that person into a position of power over children where lines may be crossed. The worst possible thing we can do as a society is make it so taboo that we can't even talk about it. So what does our society do? That, of course.

The good ol' pretend it doesn't exist so that I can live in a perfect bubble. Sure, children are still regularly being abused behind closed doors, so nothing is really accomplished by hiding it, but at least we get to feel better about it day to day, eh?

Append:

05:57 - 06:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rksKvZoUCPQ&start=357

(video unrelated, but sound bite is perfect)

dthompson
Member #5,749
April 2005
avatar

bamccaig said:

I'm not sure if this is the artwork that got them in trouble or not, but this is what I could find:

Yeah, I think that one's what caused the majority of the controversy (because of said taboo! scream!)

So here's what Maïmouna Doucouré (director) said:

Quote:

The problem, of course, is that they are not women, and they don't realize what they are doing.... The girls [portrayed in the film performing in the local dance contest] don't have the maturity, however, to realize what their gestures and dance moves look like to the audience.

I'm not sure whether Netflix's poster communicates this well. And I guess it's fine if it doesn't - but IMO they needed a better PR strategy to deal with it. Rather than defending the director's point above, they edited the poster, which kinda says "sorry we messed up" rather than "please try and understand what the film is about".

______________________________________________________
Website. It was freakdesign.bafsoft.net.
This isn't a game!

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

Found this article in my research travels, and it even happens to be recent enough to reference the "Cuties" incident:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/202009/performative-rage-over-pedophilia-doesnt-protect-kids

Pretty much reiterates points that I've already made, but he allegedly has a PhD in psychology. :P

dthompson said:

I'm not sure whether Netflix's poster communicates this well. And I guess it's fine if it doesn't - but IMO they needed a better PR strategy to deal with it. Rather than defending the director's point above, they edited the poster, which kinda says "sorry we messed up" rather than "please try and understand what the film is about".

I wonder if Netflix knew it was going to cause a shitstorm all along, and they did it intentionally for the free publicity. :) I doubt I would have even heard of it, let alone cared to watch it, if it wasn't for the social justice response. And we all know that the majority of people that were "outraged" yesterday have forgotten all about it today.

Apologizing is unfortunately just sort of good business. Like when McDonald's happily replaces your meal at no extra cost because you insist that they got your order wrong, even if you actually ordered wrong. It's better to compromise a bit and make the rare irate customer happy than to lose the customer or risk a PR backlash over a couple of digits. :)

I'm glad that it did happen the way it did though because I'm glad to have watched it. I still think it was fantastic.

dthompson
Member #5,749
April 2005
avatar

I'm not sure I could ever get into big business for precisely this reason. :P

______________________________________________________
Website. It was freakdesign.bafsoft.net.
This isn't a game!

Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
avatar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0O7lLe4SmA

2 million downvotes on the official trailer. Based.

They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas.

Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
avatar

That article isn't defending pedophiles, it's just saying that it's only a slice of the problem.

Of course in reality there's a sliding scale and the closer a person gets to 18 or 21 or some target age, the higher than chance that they should be considered an adult. But if you are an adult who is sexually attracted to someone who looks like a typical 13 year old and fantasizing about it, then you are disgusting and go get counseling now.

If you're saying you are sexually attracted to anybody who appears to be a mature adult, then that's fine, but you better be able to cool it when you realize the person isn't yet legally an adult. There's more to it being acceptable than simple physical appearance. Age is also a proxy for mental and emotional maturity too. And while it's not the perfect proxy, it's the best one we've got. There are billions of people in the world and thousands if not millions around you -- it's not hard to find someone who is both attractive and legally acceptable. :P

(Of course if she finds you attractive is maybe not so easy...)

Arthur Kalliokoski
Second in Command
February 2005
avatar

I'm not attracted to females who are young, I'm more attracted to women who look old enough to have some sense. Such as not whining about something being more expensive than you want to pay. If it's so expensive, don't buy it, case closed.

As far as youth being revered, this pretty much explains it in these media-controlled times

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKUZ42T9diU

They all watch too much MSNBC... they get ideas.

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

I'm not attracted to females who are young, I'm more attracted to women who look old enough to have some sense. Such as not whining about something being more expensive than you want to pay. If it's so expensive, don't buy it, case closed.

Young people in general are frustratingly naive. It's exhausting being around them, having to listen to their stupid ideas, in a sense reminding you of your own embarrassing mistakes of the past.

That said, that's not something that disappears at or before 21. :P I'd say it very gradually wears away with age and/or experience. There are still times where the women my wife's age (I'm 34 and she's 29) are so naive that I have to leave the room because it's so painful to hear them. :P

My grandfather met my grandmother when he was 25 and she was 16 I think. They began dating and I think were married within a year or less and pregnant within months of that. I don't think it was even a big deal back then. They had 4 kids by the time my grandmother was 19 I think.

They were married for something like 55 years (she passed away a few years ago). Happily married, as far as I could tell. They did very well for themselves and for their extended family. Financially as well as wholesomely. I can only dream for my wife and I to do half as well as they did.

As far as youth being revered, this pretty much explains it in these media-controlled times

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKUZ42T9diU

That's a fascinating take that I don't think has occurred to me.

Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
avatar

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

I think that a point of the film is that kids are exposed to this in society. In media, in school, etc. This is already a fact of life for kids in the West. In a sense, Pandora's box is already opened, and it's not so easy to close it again. Parents have little control over it. In a sense, parents lost control of their kids decades ago. Corporations control children these days. And just like the social media corporations, fashion magazines and clothing manufacturers don't care much about the ethics or morality of their business. They only care about maximizing profits. Whatever it takes to sell.

We would require a general consensus from society to try to undo it, which you will never get because many women choose to dress sexily in their teens or younger and don't see the problem with it even as they get older and become parents. To them it's fashion, it inspires confidence, and helps them to fit in with peers. They probably are completely ignorant to how it may influence boys and men to behave, and even some of those that aren't see it as empowering for girls and women. The ability to make men uncomfortable alone is powerful in a sense.

I agree that it would be ideal to be able to roll back the clock somewhat on this. For many girls, it's not even a choice. It's a requirement to fit in. For example, thongs are less comfortable, less hygienic, and significantly more provocative than more traditional underwear options. Yet because some parents allow their daughters to have them many girls and most women are pressured to have them. "Yoga pants" are the latest trend in this area. Skin tight pants with soft, thin, and flexible fabric that perfectly conform to your body. When you're out at a casual social event pay attention to what women and girls are wearing. An alarming number of them are wearing the exact same black yoga pants as all the rest. Even young girls.

That said, there's also an argument to be made that too much modesty has the unintended side effect of making everything arousing (the extreme example being where everything is covered except for women's eyes). And there are countries where it's been normal for girls to dress provocatively longer than others and it doesn't seem to be causing as much trouble there because everybody is used to it.

To reiterate: the worst thing that we can do is not talk about it.

Edgar Reynaldo
Major Reynaldo
May 2007
avatar

LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
avatar

My nephew's wife did the same thing to her children. It's up to the parents, not the media.

It's a bit of both. Parents are the major influence on a child, but unless you keep your kids locked up all the time and explicitly control what they watch, they're going to be exposed to sexualization by the media.

Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
avatar

It's up to the parents, not the media.

That's like pretending you have control over whether your kids get into Pokemon-mania.

Commercials and other kids.

You can do everything right with your kids, but they're gonna meet every a-hole parent's kids at school. It's just like a dog park. You may have great dogs, but there's gonna be tons of a-holes at the dog park.

Is the solution "control the media"? Not likely. But there should absolutely be a magnifying lens attached to any media that attempts to sexualize children because the potential for harm is too great to not do so.

-----sig:
“Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.” - Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
"Political Correctness is fascism disguised as manners" --George Carlin

DanielH
Member #934
January 2001
avatar

LennyLen said:

Parents are the major influence on a child

We try to do our best to keep them safe.

When my daughter started preschool, her teacher encouraged us to enroll her in some sort of dance studio. Mostly because she was a clumsy one and it would teach her balance. We had to turn away from a couple just because of the outfits the girls were wearing.

I don't plan on ever watching "Cuties" to verify, but it is supposed to be a film to expose the struggle these girls have to go through. Do they though? I don't think they do. How important is it that they have to belong to this club/studio?

bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
avatar

In the movie there is no club/studio involved. These are just girls that admire pop stars and other media influences, and try their best to imitate it themselves. The protagonist tries to fit in with a "clique" of girls that dance and dress provocatively. Social dynamics change a few times throughout the course of the film. I think that it's ultimately about the social dynamics of girls, and how they're exposed to sex regularly in our society, and how that might lead them to behave in ways that they wouldn't normally choose to. The film itself takes place in urban France (the film is French with subtitles).

I don't think as boys or men we can quite directly relate. Our social dynamics are so incredibly different. Boys are quick to fight, but also very quick to make up. Even boys that have been sworn enemies for years can suddenly become friendly when conditions are right. Meanwhile, girls that have been best friends for decades can become sworn enemies over the most minor details.

I wouldn't be so harsh to judge the film. There's nothing in this movie that you should be afraid to watch. It might be something that your wife or daughter (only if she's old enough) can relate to too.

Bob Keane
Member #7,342
June 2006

This comes to mind.

{"name":"612577","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/4\/9\/4924def3606b3b314e13700c59f56d19.jpg","w":300,"h":168,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/4\/9\/4924def3606b3b314e13700c59f56d19"}612577

By reading this sig, I, the reader, agree to render my soul to Bob Keane. I, the reader, understand this is a legally binding contract and freely render my soul.
"Love thy neighbor as much as you love yourself means be nice to the people next door. Everyone else can go to hell. Missy Cooper.
The advantage to learning something on your own is that there is no one there to tell you something can't be done.

Go to: