|
|
This thread is locked; no one can reply to it.
|
1
2
|
| ubuntu hud |
|
Neil Walker
Member #210
April 2000
|
Well, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16731071 {"name":"_58103777_hud.jpg","src":"http:\/\/static.allegro.cc\/image\/cache\/5\/b\/5bbf1e63e583603a777e992fdc949c31.jpg","w":336,"h":189,"tn":"http:\/\/static.allegro.cc\/image\/cache\/5\/b\/5bbf1e63e583603a777e992fdc949c31"} Neil. wii:0356-1384-6687-2022, kart:3308-4806-6002. XBOX:chucklepie |
|
van_houtte
Member #11,605
January 2010
|
I've always prefered KDE to gnome or any other wm that comes with whatever linux distro ----- Sometimes you may have to send 3-4 messages |
|
Timorg
Member #2,028
March 2002
|
Lots of decisions about Ubuntu seem to be geared towards netbooks and tablet style laptops. When you use in on an actual desktop, they seem to be clunky and not quite right. I am all for experimenting and trying new things, but giving the user a choice if they want it, is very important. With the last round of Ubuntu, I just won't be using it any more. It was the last thing I needed to get me to move my laptop across to Arch. Ubuntu have a market share and they don't seem to care if they piss it away. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
|
Hey, the HUD has a glimmer of hope, I really love KRunner's features, which seem identical to the HUD. Just the HUD is translucent and covers up a large section of the screen, which depending on your preferences may make it more, or less useful. -- |
|
Specter Phoenix
Member #1,425
July 2001
|
Timorg said: Ubuntu have a market share and they don't seem to care if they piss it away. That is almost every company here lately though. "You may think I care about what you think of me..and you'd be wrong. I'm not on this planet to please you. I'm here to take care of my family. Outside of that, you might as well be pissing in the wind. You'll get a better return from that than you will from me." |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
I switched to XUbuntu because whoever is in charge of Ubuntu is wearing a crazy hat. |
|
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
|
I put Razor-Qt on one of my old laptops. Its quite nice for a slim and light desktop. Better than LXDE at least. LXDE was fairly glitchy and incomplete. -- |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Matthew Leverton said: I switched to XUbuntu because whoever is in charge of Ubuntu is wearing a crazy hat.
In the latest Xubuntu, the keyring manager actually works. Still no setting sane date/time settings without editing arcane configuration files though. Yay, Linux. -- |
|
Tobias Dammers
Member #2,604
August 2002
|
gnolam said: Still no setting sane date/time settings without editing arcane configuration files though. Yay, Linux. On any linux-based system I've used so far, it was a matter of: 1. Set system timezone when installing, configure RTC to run on UTC Some other operating systems cough aren't even smart enough to handle daylight savings automatically. --- |
|
Peter Wang
Member #23
April 2000
|
Gimp needs this now.
|
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Tobias Dammers said: 1. Set system timezone when installing Check. Quote: Set a suitable locale in your .profile or whatever
=> edit arcane configuration files. Quote: Some other operating systems cough aren't even smart enough to handle daylight savings automatically.
OS X? -- |
|
Thomas Fjellstrom
Member #476
June 2000
|
I never have to set a suitable locale in a config file. When I install Debian, it asks me what my country and timezone is. It does the rest. Maybe get a better distro. -- |
|
Emanresu
Member #12,510
January 2011
|
I switched to Pinguy for my latest box. It's based off of Ubuntu and Linux Mint and it comes with a TON of junk built in. I'm thinking about switching to Linux Mint since Pinguy is based off of it. Linux Mint is up to date with Ubuntu and feels the way Ubuntu is supposed to feel, although it does feel a bit like KDE as well. Pinguy just seems to be a bit too cluttered, and the fact that it is a version behind doesn't help it. Thomas Fjellstrom said: Maybe get a better distro. Agreed. I've never edited a config file to change my time....... Then again, I've never had a reason to change the time once I set it. "* Entoutcas has quit IRC (Quit: And the Lord said unto John; Come forth and receive eternal life. But John came fifth and won a toaster...)" |
|
Tobias Dammers
Member #2,604
August 2002
|
Thomas Fjellstrom said: I never have to set a suitable locale in a config file. When I install Debian, it asks me what my country and timezone is. It does the rest. Maybe get a better distro. I work on a variety of Linux and FreeBSD servers; some of them default to a decent locale, others don't. For the latter systems, I just drop my .profile and .zshrc, and that's that. gnolam said: OS X? Windows. Last time I checked, it still required manual user confirmation when switching into and out of DST, which is only natural if you set the RTC to local time. --- |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Since at least XP, the following has been true:
IIRC, it worked fine in Windows 98 as well, but I don't have a 98 install at hand to test it. -- |
|
Specter Phoenix
Member #1,425
July 2001
|
Tobias Dammers said: Windows. Last time I checked, it still required manual user confirmation when switching into and out of DST, which is only natural if you set the RTC to local time. Vista doesn't for me. Just pops up a window for a few seconds on start up that warns it will be changing accordingly for DST. Though for me I just picked my timezone and checked a box that says if I observe DST or not. Then it did the rest itself. "You may think I care about what you think of me..and you'd be wrong. I'm not on this planet to please you. I'm here to take care of my family. Outside of that, you might as well be pissing in the wind. You'll get a better return from that than you will from me." |
|
Tobias Dammers
Member #2,604
August 2002
|
Mine also says I should review the time settings. Which, honestly, takes about 300 milliseconds of my time, so whatever. --- |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
But the older W98 etc. doesn't know about the DST changing at different times of the year now for political correctness. I really admire the U.S. Constitution. It's so much better than what we have now. |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Arthur Kalliokoski said: But the older W98 etc. doesn't know about the DST changing at different times of the year now for political correctness. What. -- |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
The rules have changed since 1998, and Windows 98 obviously hasn't been updated to match. |
|
Karadoc ~~
Member #2,749
September 2002
|
Does Ubuntu 1998 do DST correctly? ----------- |
|
Timorg
Member #2,028
March 2002
|
In 1998 there was a computer at home with slackware linux on it, and it had settings for DST and when to change and so forth. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
Karadoc ~~
Member #2,749
September 2002
|
Right. But Windows 98 updated DST correctly back then as well... it just hasn't kept up with the latest DST rules (allegedly). ----------- |
|
Evert
Member #794
November 2000
|
gnolam said: This has been a solved problem since, like... forever.
Indeed it has. |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
The Linux "that's a feature, not a deficiency" mindset is alive and well, I see. -- |
|
|
1
2
|