|
|
| Well, today sucks... |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
Look at the Ford Mustang. It's suffered designer bloat and resized down several times. #define GL_TIMEOUT_IGNORED 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFull |
|
Ron Novy
Member #6,982
March 2006
|
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
Gasoline is bad for that besides the fire hazard because it evaporates so fast. #define GL_TIMEOUT_IGNORED 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFull |
|
jhuuskon
Member #302
April 2000
|
Arthur Kalliokoski said: If you have multiple cams you could get such a spread with incorrect timing belt/chain installation, but that would imply multiple banks. Dual Overhead Cam - ever heard of it? IIRC Deathwish talon was powered by the classic Mitsubishi 4G63. Johan Halmén said: Yeah, the people with most money are supposed to be the big bosses who live a classy life, spending their money on opera tickets. And big clumsy cars. I was wondering what happened with the BMW cars back in the 80's. They got their asses handed over to them by the French and Italians. Simply put, in the 80's BMW couldn't fullfill the prestige criteria required by its own brand name while also maintaining the level of external compactness and internal room because their inability to design and construct decent FWD cars (30 years later and they still can't), defeat the Peugeot 205 GTi in sheer fun, make it cheap enough to actually sell and still make a profit. You don't deserve my sig. |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
jhuuskon said: Dual Overhead Cam - ever heard of it? IIRC Deathwish talon was powered by the classic Mitsubishi 4G63. Yeah, but since the lobes are all synchronized according to the firing order, they'd all have a similar low compression reading no matter how you timed them. Since the exhaust would all be off by X amount and the intake would all be off by Y amount. [EDIT] Quote: Dual Overhead Cam - ever heard of it? I didn't work on one of those until 1996 or so... I'm a n00b. #define GL_TIMEOUT_IGNORED 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFull |
|
Ron Novy
Member #6,982
March 2006
|
|
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
I heat my house with electricity. And in environment discussion I'm therefore a bad guy. Everyone is bugging on people who heat with electricity. Not that much on people who heat with oil, f.i. Why is it the opposite when talking about cars? Why are electric cars supposed to be better than petrochemical cars? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
jhuuskon
Member #302
April 2000
|
Efficiency. A diesel car turns only 35-40% of the fuel's chemical energy into kinetic energy. Even less efficient for gasoline. Electric motors OTOH are around 90% efficient. Besides, the direct elecricity heating being bad fuzz is all about marketing. You live (relatively) close to a nuclear power plant, so electricity is rather cheap way for you to provide warmth for your family. Tthe low tranfer losses and high efficiency of electric heaters means 1 watt spent on heating your place only takes about 1.1 watts from the reactor's capacity. OTOH My place heats with district heating (with mandatory leaky plumbing) from the local heat plant that burns peat with equipment dating back to the 60's. Guess which one of us is the bigger environmental criminal here? edit: Fixedet. You don't deserve my sig. |
|
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
|
jhuuskon said: Electric motors OTOH are around 90% efficient.
Unfortunately, it's not that simple. As for the timing suggestion, the cams are in time with themselves for sure, and I checked and rechecked a thousand times back-in-the-day when I was assembling the engine because it's such a pain in the ass to do. It's still possible that it's off, but for it to be down to 40 psi would practically require it to be 90 degrees off. Moreover, the balance shafts are timed as well and they appear to be in working order because the engine doesn't shimmy like a beast when I turn the engine over. (If they were out-of-order, it could be as much as twice the unbalanced force as had the engine had no balance shafts at all.) My only options that I can think of (assuming a good head) are a badly-seated or improperly torqued heat gasket or possibly a cracked block. The block could be cracked because before last winter I put coolant into it but didn't properly mix the anti-freeze and water before putting it in. I put about half a jug of water and then half a jug of coolant, and then I mixed the rest together and dumped it in. So winter could freeze some water and destroy my block, however, I don't think it's likely. I never filled it completely with coolant/water, so it had room to expand even if it wasn't mixed and no freeze plugs have exploded. Either way, I don't really have time to work on it during the rest of my spring break. I've got to replace the timing chain guides on my VR6 which is a very time-intensive job. The dealer quoted me $1,200 just in labor. "Materialistic things can't bring you happiness. Except Marshmellows--which are pretty much the same thing." |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
Chris Katko said: My only options that I can think of (assuming a good head) are a badly-seated or improperly torqued heat gasket or possibly a cracked block I've never heard of a "badly seated" gasket, but it's possible for head bolt torque to be thrown off by not blowing out the (blind) holes (the bolts "seat" on the coolant at the bottom of the hole) or rust increasing the torque required. I've seen head bolts that required 40 ft/lbs of torque just to turn them against the rusty threads (and the owner said "just tighten them down harder"). You're supposed to run the holes through with a bottoming tap, but hardly anybody does it in real life. #define GL_TIMEOUT_IGNORED 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFull |
|
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
|
Arthur Kalliokoski said: You're supposed to run the holes through with a bottoming tap, but hardly anybody does it in real life.
Ditto. I didn't run a tap. However, that was two years ago. Now I work a tap like I do peanut butter across bread. If I had realized it was that easy, I would have done it. "Materialistic things can't bring you happiness. Except Marshmellows--which are pretty much the same thing." |
|
|
|