|
|
| 1.3 million GM cars are being recalled |
|
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
|
Huffington Post said: The brakes on these cars are fine, but the power steering doesn't work, so either way, you wind up running into a tree," said GM spokesman Tracy Klugian. "In our business we call that 'pulling a Toyota.'" While interesting, I don't really care because the corporation--just like Toyota--is going to fix the problem. Really, I find it idiotic that Toyota has received this much flak for this problem. But GM? GM can suck it. GM is America's largest manufacturer AND they took bailout money, and they're publicly mocking a competing company that makes better, safer products. For those who recall a previous thread of mine, I coined that GM made the Cavalier which has a half-star side impact rating for over ten years and knew about it. In other words, they don't care if you die if you don't spend enough money. If I was Toyota, I'd sue GM for defamation of character. "Materialistic things can't bring you happiness. Except Marshmellows--which are pretty much the same thing." |
|
m c
Member #5,337
December 2004
|
Why Toyota got so much flak? Why else, Toyota probably failed to keep up their protection money payments. Or failed to endorse someone enough or so on. I mean what was it even about? Incorrect speedometer readings? Fuel injector increasing rate without pedals going down? That's what lots of media FUD was saying but then it's about price fixing. Anything that sticks, truly bizarre. I read that GM is majority-owned by US Treasuring department, US government invested a total of US$57.6 BILLION, a smear campaign on the national media, so I am calling it the Government-Media-Industrial-Complex. (\ /)_____#_____####__# |
|
verthex
Member #11,340
September 2009
|
I will never buy a GM car unless I'm forced to at gunpoint. I've had 2 GM cars, an 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS and a 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme. The Monte Carlo was a rust bucket which was not the biggest fault besides the engine being replaced at 70k miles and the transmission as well. The entire electrical system was constantly at fault for the car stopping on idle or not starting, this was due to a short. Its a great car for the NASCAR enthusiast but a pain for just having a nice car, I'd rather have a Lexus. The Cutlass supreme had a faulty fuel injection ( also on a recall notice) system that would make the car run like it had a shortage of fuel at the stop light. This was replaced twice in 160 k miles. The V-belt system fell apart at 60k miles (The pulley itself). There were so many weird noises coming from the car by 100k that no one wanted to buy it used. Oldsmobile went out of business in 2004 and I can see the reasons why.
|
|
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
|
You implied a great point. I do not support the defamation of free market companies by ones run by the government. "Materialistic things can't bring you happiness. Except Marshmellows--which are pretty much the same thing." |
|
gnolam
Member #2,030
March 2002
|
Chris Katko said: In other words, they don't care if you die if you don't spend enough money.
Quote: A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.
-- |
|
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
|
Chris Katko said: In other words, they don't care if you die if you don't spend enough money. Should they? The way I see it, the problem is that people just can't afford American made manufacturing anymore (not with the lifestyles most choose to lead, anyway). Foreign companies can make better quality products cheaper and they do. Their citizens can't expect the same wages. About 4 of the major car dealerships in town (out of maybe 8 or 10) have been shut down now for months because the employees are locked out, refusing to work at the wages offered. And [North] American consumers flock to those foreign products, leaving the American companies to cut corners to make cars "affordable". You get what you pay for. I bet close to 50% of the cars I see around this region are Kia or Hyundai now. I hate those PoS cars. I suppose we're just going to have to surrender to the Koreans because American companies can't compete and [North] American consumers don't much care about them... -- acc.js | al4anim - Allegro 4 Animation library | Allegro.cc Mockup | Allegro.cc <code> Tag | Allegro 4 Timer Example (w/ Semaphores) | Bambot | Blog | C++ STL Container Flowchart | Castopulence Software | Check Return Values | Is This A Discussion? Flow Chart | Filesystem Hierarchy Standard | Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons | How To Use Header Files | GNU/Linux (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo) | rot (rot13, rot47, rotN) |
|
m c
Member #5,337
December 2004
|
bamccaig, I think it might be more complicated than even that. And those Toyotas are made in USA too... (\ /)_____#_____####__# |
|
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
|
bamccaig said: Should they? The way I see it, the problem is that people just can't afford American made manufacturing anymore (not with the lifestyles most choose to lead, anyway). If you charge more than $10,000 for something, solely of my opinion, it better be damn well safe. To say you need to pay more than that just to have a safe car is silly. Moreover, if it is not stated in the brochure that you are buying a car that is misleadingly unsafe, it is grounds for litigation. Quote: Their citizens can't expect the same wages. About 4 of the major car dealerships in town (out of maybe 8 or 10) have been shut down now for months because the employees are locked out, refusing to work at the wages offered. Toyota manufacturing jobs pay wages in America similar to the Big Three. gnolam said: A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one. A Fight Club reference to the Ford Pinto fiasco. Yet, I still feel safer with modern Ford than GM. Ford has new management and a dedication to improvement now--to contrast 30-40 years ago. They're products are getting much better--though, I still don't prefer to buy them. Chrysler makes safe cars (minus the Caravan...) but their product durability is nil. GM is still run by scum, as evidenced by this recent outburst. That statement is not becoming of a professional environment. "Materialistic things can't bring you happiness. Except Marshmellows--which are pretty much the same thing." |
|
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
|
Chris Katko said: If you charge more than $10,000 for something, solely of my opinion, it better be damn well safe.
The amount is irrelevant. How safe would you feel in a $10,000 aircraft carrier? There is always a spectrum of poor to high quality. I would say $20,000 is on the low end for cars. $30,000 is getting into the decent range. $40,000+ is where you can start having expectations for quality. If you think you can engineer a perfect machine and market it for less while still making a profit then I look forward to your company's success. Chris Katko said: Toyota manufacturing jobs pay wages in America similar to the Big Three. Maybe in the USA, but what about everywhere else they have factories? If they can offset the costs in the USA in other parts of the world then all foreign companies automatically have that advantage over American companies whose foreign markets are weak at best. -- acc.js | al4anim - Allegro 4 Animation library | Allegro.cc Mockup | Allegro.cc <code> Tag | Allegro 4 Timer Example (w/ Semaphores) | Bambot | Blog | C++ STL Container Flowchart | Castopulence Software | Check Return Values | Is This A Discussion? Flow Chart | Filesystem Hierarchy Standard | Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons | How To Use Header Files | GNU/Linux (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo) | rot (rot13, rot47, rotN) |
|
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
|
bamccaig said: I would say $20,000 is on the low end for cars. $30,000 is getting into the decent range. $40,000+ is where you can start having expectations for quality.
What world do you live in? The median income in America is $32,000 before medical care, housing, and living expenses. So by that logic the average American can't afford safety. Quote:
2010 Volkswagen Jetta 2010 Honda Civic 5 stars, all under $20,000. Quote:
2005 Chevy Cavalier The GM version of "under $20,000." Quote:
2010 Hyundai Accent Blue The Hyundai version of "under $20,000." Would you'd pay $365 to not die? Except, the 2005 Cavalier, adjusted for inflation, is $11,630. So would you be willing to save $940 to not die? Moreover, on the "American" car makers not being able to afford it. Over 70% of the Ford Mustang comes from overseas. So they're cheating just as much as any other company. There's more American parts in a Toyota Camry than a Mustang. And Volkswagens are made in Germany and America, both of which are hardly 3rd-world countries. Yet Volkswagens still out perform GM vehicles. The point still stands that American manufacturers have willingly put themselves into a place of non-competition, opting to pay off legislators instead of building the best products. They deserve everything they get, and no bailout. Did you know that an American is responsible for Japan's success in business? American businesses didn't want to listen to him, so he went overseas and taught the Japanese. "Materialistic things can't bring you happiness. Except Marshmellows--which are pretty much the same thing." |
|
BAF
Member #2,981
December 2002
|
Maybe I'll go buy a 2011 Hyundai Sonata. The test drive was real nice. |
|
Samuel Henderson
Member #3,757
August 2003
|
Chris Katko said: What world do you live in? The median income in America is $32,000 before medical care, housing, and living expenses. So by that logic the average American can't afford safety.
He lives in the Canadian/USA border world I don't think very many people go out and plunk down $20-30k cash for a new vehicle. Everyone I know gets financing when they buy new vehicles and it usually takes them a few years to pay it off. So if that means that it may take a typical American family a few or so years to pay off a brand new $20k or more vehicle. ================================================= |
|
Bob Keane
Member #7,342
June 2006
|
I had a Mustang some years back. It had a problem with sudden acceleration. I remember reading some people were complaining about the problem but Ford(Found On Road Dead) kept denying the problem existed. The car was five years old when I got it, I had it for another five so the problem existed for quite some time. It was not until some years after I got rid of the car that they acknowledged a problem with the cruise control caused the sudden acceleration. There were no hearings that I remember. Toyota is getting a raw deal if you ask me. By reading this sig, I, the reader, agree to render my soul to Bob Keane. I, the reader, understand this is a legally binding contract and freely render my soul. |
|
bamccaig
Member #7,536
July 2006
|
Both my parents' '89 Ford Crown Victoria (which we got rid of years ago) and '95 Ford Crown Victoria had that same acceleration problem. You would be driving along happy and suddenly you'd realize that the car was accelerating all by itself and you'd have to ride the brakes to hold it back (even on the highway!). There was nothing you could do. Finally, presumably after Ford finally admitted it (years after we got rid of the '89 and years after we got the '95) my dad took the '95 into the shop (read: a couple of years ago) to have the cruise control (and related systems) removed. So it doesn't do that anymore, but now you have no cruise control... I remember one time (I don't recall which car it was) I was pulling into a rural Home Depot parking lot (dirt) and was pulling up behind a parked car to park behind it. I had let off the accelerator to coast in, but I suddenly realized that I wasn't coasting at all, but rather ACCELERATING. I locked up all four tires, aggressively sliding through the dirt, and stopped just short of the car in front of me while the owner was walking to his car... I got out and he said "I saw that" in a sort of old man complaining about kids today way, thinking I had done it on purpose... I just smiled, still slightly in shock, and went on with my business, swearing to never drive that car again. -- acc.js | al4anim - Allegro 4 Animation library | Allegro.cc Mockup | Allegro.cc <code> Tag | Allegro 4 Timer Example (w/ Semaphores) | Bambot | Blog | C++ STL Container Flowchart | Castopulence Software | Check Return Values | Is This A Discussion? Flow Chart | Filesystem Hierarchy Standard | Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons | How To Use Header Files | GNU/Linux (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo) | rot (rot13, rot47, rotN) |
|
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
|
p.s. I'm not sure why I always come off as a douchebag in my writing. I apologize, again. "Materialistic things can't bring you happiness. Except Marshmellows--which are pretty much the same thing." |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
I had a T-Bird back in the '80's and one time I'm on cruise, come up to a red light, and the harder I push on the brake, the harder the engine's trying to make it go. I had the presence of mind to shut off the cruise, then didn't use it anymore. But then I noticed people coming up behind me and locking up their brakes when we were all slowing down for a red light, so I checked that the brake lights worked. They didn't, it was a bad brake light switch on the pedal, and fixing that made the cruise control work properly again. I really admire the U.S. Constitution. It's so much better than what we have now. |
|
Chris Katko
Member #1,881
January 2002
|
Arthur Kalliokoski said: They didn't, it was a bad brake light switch on the pedal, and fixing that made the cruise control work properly again. Ouch! I can tell what they did--there's no point in having two brake switches--but I'm not sure why they messed it up so badly that it would fail with your brake light. Sounds like cruise control was added as a severe after-thought! That's scary! bamccaig said:
If you think you can engineer a perfect machine and market it for less while still making a profit then I look forward to your company's success. Thanks! And I do plan on doing just that! Now, I don't really know if there's an easy way to make a cheaper econobox meatwagon, but in terms of spartan sports cars and 2 seater econoboxes I'm pretty confident I can do it better. Super-long-term durability is the goal. "Materialistic things can't bring you happiness. Except Marshmellows--which are pretty much the same thing." |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
Some Volvos had a vacuum line running to the brake pedal, stepping on the pedal opened a little valve that opened the line to air, killing the vacuum. Any failure in this setup would result in no vacuum, so the cruise control could only fail at the brake pedal signal by not working at all, rather than trying to maintain speed. I really admire the U.S. Constitution. It's so much better than what we have now. |
|
decepto
Member #7,102
April 2006
|
BAF said: Hyundai Sonata I own a 2002 Sonata. It has about 150,000 miles on it. It's been a work horse, and I absolutely love it. It looks like shit, but it gets the job done. The quality of Hynadai's product is comparable to Honda's, but it has a poorer perception in the marketplace and thus is cheaper. Unless I hit the lottery, my next car will definitely be another Sonata. -------------------------------------------------- |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
I've lived through 42 side impact crashes on my 2000 Cavalier, so I won't be giving it up any time soon. |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
There have been far more than 42 side impact crashes worldwide since the year 2000, or you mean you bought it 4 days ago? I really admire the U.S. Constitution. It's so much better than what we have now. |
|
Matthew Leverton
Supreme Loser
January 1999
|
I'm talking about my car... |
|
Arthur Kalliokoski
Member #5,540
February 2005
|
So your Chevy has suffered 42 side impact crashes? No wonder you're not giving it up soon, no one wants it now! [EDIT] Get it towed out of that busy intersection! I really admire the U.S. Constitution. It's so much better than what we have now. |
|
Johan Halmén
Member #1,550
September 2001
|
It scares me that we got more and more drivers who
Feel free to add to the list. What comes next? Pedestrian recognizing system? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
LennyLen
Member #5,313
December 2004
|
Johan Halmén said:
I don't think I've ever driven a car with any of those features (I have driven automatics though, but I prefer a manual).
|
|
|
|